Case File
efta-efta01089665DOJ Data Set 9OtherDS9 Document EFTA01089665
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01089665
Pages
7
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
UBS
Chief Investment Officer
Wealth Management
May 2013
Alexander S. Friedman
Global CIO UBS WM
UBS CIO Monthly Letter
The rubber ducks
Gold's recent decline can help us grasp the
interplay between major market perfor-
mance and central bank stimulus efforts.
In the last few weeks, gold garnered a great
deal of attention as its price fell approxi-
mately 10% (see Fig. 1). This led many inves-
tors to reconsider their notions of a "safe
haven," and to reassess what fair value
might be. Buyers of gold have long known
that its price is divorced from the fundamen-
tal factors that move pure commodities, and
is driven instead by more ethereal dynamics
like private investor demand. Valuing gold
as a simple commodity would imply a fun-
damental price of USD 1,150/oz. At that
price, 10% of gold mines would be loss
making, and the metal would trade 19%
below current levels and 40% below 2011's
all-time peak.
It would be wrong to conclude, however,
that investing in assets purely based on fun-
damental value will always work. There may
be good reason for asset prices to diverge
from pure fundamental value. In the case of
gold, investor demand to diversify away
from paper money has helped gold rise by
more than 300% in the past decade, and
long-term holders are still sitting on tidy
profits. John Maynard Keynes's quip that
"markets can remain irrational a lot longer
than you and I can remain solvent," is an
enduring lesson.
The volatility in gold reminds us that inves-
tors must employ a critical eye when prices
are divorced from pure fundamental value.
In such cases, it is important to assess
whether the "other" factors that are prop-
ping up prices are going to persist. This
applies whether we are looking at gold,
government bonds or bitcoins. And it
is particularly pertinent in a world where
central banks are perceived as driving the
prices of many asset markets, particularly
the fixed income market.
I have now written four paragraphs of my
monthly letter without employing a meta-
phor, but I can resist no longer.
We can picture markets today as a bunch of
rubber ducks floating in bathtubs. The water
flowing from the tap represents central bank
liquidity, the ducks signify market perfor-
mance, and the plug stands for the funda-
mental strength of the economy.
Concerns over the fundamental strength of
the economy have grown in regions around
the world. This concern is evident in the
recent weakness in commodity prices and in
the declines in some economic growth
trends, like the purchasing managers indi-
ces, across the US, the Eurozone and China.
Therefore, in each region, we must carefully
assess: (i) the velocity of the flowing water;
(ii) how long the tap will remain turned on;
and (iii) whether the plug is secure. Broadly,
as long as we're comfortable with two of
these three factors, it can make sense to bet
on the duck rising.
In the American bath, the tap remains on.
There is some debate about how long the
US Federal Reserve (the Fed) will keep it on,
but over our tactical time frame of the next
six months we are confident the water will
keep flowing. Moreover, we believe the plug
is secure given the recovery in the housing
market and good corporate earnings
growth. As such we feel comfortable with
our overweight positions in US equities and
US high yield credit.
This report has been prepared by UBS AG. Please see important dulaimers and chsclosins at the end of the docionent. Past performance is no indcaticn of future performance.
The market paces worded are closing prices on the respective principal stork exchange. This applies to all performance charts and tables in this puttication.
EFTA01089665
UBS CIO Monthly Letter
In the Japanese bathtub, the plug has been out of place
for years, but with the Bank of Japan (Bo.° now turning
the tap fully open, the bath water is rising fast, and we
are adding an overweight position in Japanese equities.
We will fund this overweight position in Japan by reduc-
ing emerging markets to neutral.
In our Chinese bath, the government has become wor-
ried the duck is floating too near the top, so it has turned
off the tap, and other emerging markets could suffer
weaker earnings if commodity prices remain at current
levels.
Finally, in the Eurozone tub, the European Central Bank
(ECB) has put in place a secure temporary plug, but the
tap is producing little more than a trickle and we know
that longer term, the temporary plug must be replaced
with a better one, a long-term structural solution (a big
unknown at this point), so we are maintaining an under-
weight position in the euro.
There are many subtleties in each regional bath, and in
the remainder of this letter I will discuss in more detail
the underlying economic picture and the impact and
future evolution of central bank stimulus measures.
The mighty US duck
In last month's letter, I described how the US economy
and its consumers represent the most important driver
for the global outlook. Since then there has been rela-
tively weak data, with non-farm payrolls rising by just
88,000 in March (after climbing by 268,000 in February),
retail sales declining 0.4% in the month (from +1.0%),
and the ISM Manufacturing index dropping to 51.3 from
54.2. This has led many to question the stability of the
US economic recovery, at the same time as investors have
become worried that the Fed might "turn the tap off,"
by ending quantitative easing (QE), or even by starting to
sell its USD 3trn pile of Treasuries and mortgage-backed
Fig. 1: Gold price falls sharply
Gold prize IUS0. oz)
2000
1900
1800
1700
1600
1500
1400
1300
1200
1100
1000
a
4'
.1
A
4•
Sc
A
securities (MBS). This kind of market noise regarding the
Fed is worrisome, as some investors believe the market is
divorced from fundamental value, with even the Fed
minutes stating that "a lengthy period of low long-term
rates could encourage excessive risk-taking."
So we need to assess whether US asset prices are indeed
divorced from fundamental value and, if so, what impact
a withdrawal of Fed stimulus could have.
Our conclusion is that the strength of US risk assets year-
to-date reflects an improved fundamental economic pic-
ture. However, the USD 60bn "sequester" series of auto-
matic spending cuts has begun to have an impact on the
wider economy. The direct negative hit of around 0.4%
of GDP is manageable, but indirect effects could be
higher. For example, consumer and corporate confidence
is hardly likely to be boosted by the recent air travel dis-
ruption. As a result, we expect real consumption growth
to slow in the second quarter to 2.4% annualized, from
2.9% in the first quarter. However, the underlying pri-
vate sector remains healthy, and recent soft data has
been largely attributable to lower government spending
and inventory destocking (see Fig. 2). Over the balance
of the year consumption should accelerate as a result of
the improving labor market, lower gasoline prices, and
stronger capital formation as businesses finally begin to
invest their unprecedented cash balances. Finally, higher
house prices have the potential to boost GDP growth
through a combination of the wealth effect and con-
struction spending; March saw the fastest pace of new
home construction since June 2008.
In the near term, there are a number of reasons we do
not expect the Fed to scale down its stimulus. First, the
Fed should remain accommodative while the full impact
of the sequester spending cuts lies ahead. Second, the
US labor market has improved, but the 7.6% unemploy-
ment rate remains well above the 6.5% threshold the
Fig. 2: US underlying demand stable
US GOP Icraq, annualised. %)
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Om
0211
0311
0411
0112
0212
0312
0412
—
US GDP
—
Final sales
UBS Chief Investment Office May 2013
2
EFTA01089666
UBS CIO Monthly Letter
Fed set as its target before it will consider tightening pol-
icy. Third, the Fed is well aware that, while funding costs
have improved, overall credit availability remains tight.
Recent results from the US banks show decelerating loan
growth and declining net interest margins. And, finally,
continued weakness in the Eurozone economies and flux
in the European political situation support a continued
loose monetary stance by the Fed.
Therefore, we expect only a steady tapering off of eco-
nomic stimulus, and foresee the Fed reducing monthly
asset purchases by USD 10bn per month starting around
October, leaving the rate of asset purchases at USD 65bn
by year-end. This is unlikely to have a major negative
impact on risk assets.
Ironically, if the Fed were to consider withdrawing its
stimulus more aggressively, the "safest" assets could
prove the most dangerous. Merely signaling a sale of the
Fed's Treasury holdings would risk bond market partici-
pants pricing almost USD 2trn of new supply, and could
lead to disorderly bond markets. Chairman Ben Ber-
nanke is well aware of this and Fed members have
recently sought to highlight the interest rate mechanism
as the primary "exit" tool. This would nonetheless be
detrimental to (if not catastrophic for) the Treasury mar-
ket, but, provided it came in response to better-than-
expected growth, it is unlikely to affect riskier assets
meaningfully.
In sum, we don't believe the Fed will turn off the bath
tap and stop its support for our American rubber duck
until it is confident of a more self-sustaining recovery. In
the meantime, US assets will continue to benefit from
the rather enviable situation of strong central bank sup-
port coinciding with an improvement in economic
activity.
Fig. 3: The Bank of Japan impacting earnings estimates
Japan equtties earnings growth (yay,
60
so
40
30
20
10
0
Japan calls in the fire truck hoses
If some believe the US market may be divorced from fun-
damentals, then the more than 50% rise in the Nikkei
225 equity index (calculated in yen) since November begs
for discussion. The rally has taken on new impetus since
the BOJ announced it would double its monetary base
within the next two years. Using my rubber duck anal-
ogy, this is the equivalent of the BoJ turning the tap on
full and then calling in the fire trucks to use their hoses
as well. It is no surprise the water is rising.
To put this in context, the Fed is making annual net pur-
chases of 7% of GDP. Japan will be purchasing assets at
close to twice this rate, or about 13% of GDP. Addition-
ally, the BoJ is not focusing purely on fixed income assets
like government bonds and mortgage-backed securities,
but is instead also buying equities through exchange-
traded funds, as well as real estate investment trusts.
But will it help Japan achieve its 2% inflation target? It
will be difficult, and indeed many economists would sug-
gest that 2% consumer price inflation (CPI) in Japan is
impossible. The country's output gap sits at roughly 3%,
and, after a generation of deflation, resetting inflation
expectations is extremely difficult. The most recent labor
market data showing a 0.7% fall in wages for the first
few months of this year is evidence of this.
However, there is an argument that 2% inflation may be
achievable. First, the yen's 25% fall in the past six months
should translate into a 0.5% boost to inflation, and
should "Abenomics," the economic policy promoted by
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, begin to have an
effect, the yen could fall a further 10%. Second, there
are signs that there may not be as much spare capacity
in the labor market as deflating wages might suggest —
the Tankan survey actually indicates the labor surplus is
Fig. 4: Emerging markets seeing divergent performance
Index Insbased. ytc0
125
120
115
110
105
100
95
90
85
ao
1
—
EPS grmh FY 2013
—
EPS grmh FY 2014
is
'7
'7
47.
A
-
Brazil
Russia
Phippines
—
China
Indonesia
? ? ?
UBS Chief Investment Office May 2013
3
EFTA01089667
UBS OO Monthly Letter
turning into a labor shortage. Third, inflation expecta-
tions are starting to rise, and the five-year inflation rate
Lnplied by the inflation-protected bond market is 1.5%
up from 0.5% just a year ago.
Returning to my bathtub analogy, it is unclear if
Abenomics will be successful in "securing the plug" and
transforming the Japanese economy after more than a
decade of malaise. But the Bar tap is clearly having an
impact. The weakness in the yen has helped earnings
growth estimates for the Nikkei for the financial year to
March 2014 rise to over 50% in the past six months
alone (see Fig. 3) from around 20%. If the yen remains
at current levels we could even see earnings upgraded
by a further 10%. The Nikkei has run ahead of these
earnings upgrades, but on a 14.9x one-year forward
price-to-earnings ratio, it is not obviously overvalued
relative to its 10-year average of 16.3x.
Finally, the Bar is nothing if not determined to give Japan
a fighting chance with its massive dose of new liquidity.
We therefore are initiating an overweight position in Jap-
anese equities, and within this market we believe the
best way of taking advantage of the Japanese reflation
theme is through positions in Japanese exporters.
Emerging markets = diverging markets?
If the return of Japanese equities has been one of the
great surprises of the past six months, the stark under-
performance of emerging market equities is certainly
one too. It seems almost counterintuitive that the region
of the world with the fastest economic growth also suf-
fers from the lowest equity valuations. But after a 12%
underperformance year-to-date, emerging market equi-
ties are now trading on a 2013 price-to-earnings ratio of
just 10.1x.
In the earlier discussion on gold, I said that investing in
assets based purely on fundamental value is not an
Fig. 5: Weak German manufacturing data
Purchasing Managers' lodes
a .6
en
en
te
& g
LL
cc
en
en
optimal strategy. In this same vein, it should be noted
that just because emerging markets as a whole are
"cheap" doesn't mean their underperformance will cor-
rect in the near term.
One of the most striking features about emerging mar-
kets this year, aside from their underperformance as a
whole, has been the stark divergence between the mar-
ket performance of individual countries. It has been less
a case of emerging markets, and more a case of diverg-
ing markets. After a strong start to the year, Chinese
equities have fallen sharply in recent months due to
signs of policy tightening, particularly with respect to
increased government regulation of wealth manage-
ment products and the property sector. Furthermore,
there are signs that economic growth is slowing — GDP
data disappointed expectations, rising by only 7.7% in
the first quarter (consensus 7.9%), and this week's
HSBC purchasing managers' index fell to 50.5 in April
from 51.6 in March. The associated weakness in com-
modity prices has weighed on Brazil and Russia too.
Meanwhile, Korea's competitiveness has been chal-
lenged by the Japanese yen's 20% depreciation against
the Korean won in the past six months. Partially as a
result, Korean equities have lagged Japanese equities
by close to 25% (in constant currency terms) year-to-
date. Conversely, the more domestically oriented mar-
kets, such as the Philippines and Indonesia, have per-
formed very strongly (see Fig. 4).
With such divergence, emerging markets as a group
are testing investors. Near-term uncertainties over
global growth, the future of Chinese policy, and the
outlook for commodities all combine to make it hard
to foresee a near-term catalyst to help emerging mar-
kets realize their significant longer-term valuation
potential. Given this, it makes sense to focus on
selected countries. Specifically, on a tactical basis, we
recommend that investors seek exposure to the
Fig. 6: Positioning speaks in favor of the CAD vs AUD
sAi postai% n 100 contacts
1503
1003
CO
0
—S00
s
s
it
S
—
CAD
—
AUD
UBS Chief Investment Office May 2013
4
EFTA01089668
UBS 00 Monthly Letter
domestic recovery stories in Brazil and India, the out-
of-favor Russian and Korean equity markets, and also
to broader emerging market growth through Western
corporations, via Western Winners from Emerging
Market growth.
On a strategic basis, however, an adequate allocation to
emerging markets overall remains important. Valuations
are attractive, and emerging markets will continue to
offer the world's highest GDP growth rates, with the
lowest sovereign leverage. And, outside of equities, we
continue to hold an overweight position in corporate
emerging market credit, and emerging market curren-
cies remain a 00 preferred theme.
Calm on the surface in the Eurozone
It is ordinarily a positive sign if I can get through the bulk
of my monthly letter without lots of discussion of the
Eurozone. The "good news" is the Eurozone appears to
be diminishing in importance in terms of driving global
markets, with the near-term fear of a break-up falling
away. Spanish and Italian bond yields have begun to move
more independently of wider risk sentiment, and the
inverse correlation between their yields and global equity
markets is near the weakest level it has been in a year.
Sadly, this calm on the surface does not reflect an
improvement in the Eurozone's underlying prospects.
This week's sentiment indices show the ongoing weak-
ness in the economy: the German Manufacturing PMI
fell to 47.9 from 49.0 (see Fig. 5), and the German Ifo
business climate index dropped to 104.4 from 106.7.
Structural solutions remain elusive, and ahead of the
German elections in September, progress is likely to be
non-existent. Italy has finally found a new prime minister,
but he faces challenges in enacting reforms. Elsewhere,
credit rating agency Moody's retains a negative outlook
on Spain, threatening it with a downgrade to junk sta-
tus, potentially exacerbating an already difficult funding
situation for the country's corporations. Cyprus retains
its capital controls, which if maintained for a long period
of time, endanger the integrity of the euro. And there is
speculation that Slovenia could be the "next domino to
fall;" a potential loss of access to the bond market could
force the country into an ESM bailout.
These dim economic prospects lead us to believe the ECB
will cut its refinancing rate from 0.75% to 0.5% at its
upcoming meeting on May 2. If this materializes, it
would support our underweight position in the euro.
Troubling commodities
The problems in the Eurozone may not be influencing
global equities as strongly as they have previously, but
they have had a huge influence on the price of gold in
recent weeks. ECB President Mario Draghi's comments
that the profits of any gold sales by the Central Bank of
Cyprus must be used to cover any losses made on its
loans to commercial banks appeared to send the gold
market into a tailspin, with prices dropping as much as
15% over three trading sessions.
To be clear, Draghi's comments were misinterpreted. It
was always the case that if the Cypriot central bank sold
its gold it would have to cover its own losses before
transferring any money to the Cypriot government.
Draghi was merely clarifying this, not ordering the asset
sale. As such, we believe the move is overdone. However,
with over one-third of global gold demand attributable
to investment demand, gold relies greatly on the trust
among investors that it can truly act as a hedge against
expansionary central bank policies. The recent gold price
move may have dented that trust, and so we are main-
taining a neutral position, forecasting gold to trade in a
range of USD 1,150-1,550 per ounce over the next three
months.
Asset allocation and themes
Within equities, we are replacing our tactical overweight
position in emerging markets with one in Japan, for the
reasons described earlier. We also are maintaining our
overweight position in the US relative to Canada, since
the Canadian housing market recovery is likely to lag
that of the US, and since the sharp downward move in
the gold price is likely to hinder Canada's large gold min-
ing sector.
Elsewhere, within fixed income we remain overweight
global investment grade credit as well as US high yield
bonds, which continue to offer an attractive premium of
466bps over US Treasuries. We expect low corporate
default rates, and a strong appetite for yield from inves-
tors to offer support for the sector.
We are making a number of additions to our currency
positioning. First, we are adding an overweight position
in the US dollar. Economic growth is stronger than in
other regions, and discussions over a potential reduction
in QE could support the currency, particularly relative to
the euro where an ECB refinancing rate cut is likely. With
economic growth expected to stay weak in the Euro-
zone, we will increase our underweight in the region,
but instead of adding to our euro short, we will intro-
duce a long USDCHF position. The EURCHF 1.20 floor
remains solid, and as such the franc could weaken fur-
ther from current levels.
Second, we are taking an overweight position in the
Canadian dollar. Canadian consumer confidence, busi-
ness sentiment, and investment spending are picking up,
while the recent rise in inflation should calm any dovish-
ness at the Bank of Canada. Meanwhile, positioning
data suggests the market is very short the Canadian dol-
lar (see Fig. 6), meaning positive surprises could have an
outsized impact. We suggest setting this against the
Australian dollar. It is overvalued, its positioning is long
UBS Chief Investment Office May 2013
5
EFTA01089669
UBS CO Monthly Letter
and Australia's most recent economic data suggests a
potential slowdown in employment growth.
These two currency positions also will help diversify our
overall portfolio. While a return to a "risk-off" environ-
ment is not our base case, such currency positions should
perform particularly well if global growth deteriorates,
balancing some of the potential weakness that could be
seen in our overweight positions in equities and credit.
Finally, we continue to favor the British pound over the
euro. This week's announcement of an extension to the
Funding for Lending scheme could see some Monetary
Policy Committee members back away from calls for
more QE, and concerns over a change in Bank of
England policy should continue to recede following
March's Budget Statement.
Thank you for your consideration in making it all the
way through this letter. As always, any comments are
appreciated.
Alexander S. Friedman
Global Chief Investment Officer
Wealth Management
25 April 2013
UBS Chief Investment Office May 2013
6
EFTA01089670
UBS CIO WM Research is published by Wealth Management & Swiss Bank and Wealth Management Americas, Business Divisions of 1185 AG (UBS) or an affiliate
thereof. In certain countries U8S AG is referred to as UBS SA. This publication is for your information only and is not intended as an offer, or a solicitation of an offer, to
buy or sell any investment a other specific product. The analysis contained herein is based on numerous assumptions. Different assumptions could result in materially
different results. Certain services and products are subject to legal restrictions and cannot be offered worldwide on an unrestricted basis and/or may not be efigble fa
sale to all investors. All information and opinions expressed in this document were obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith, but no representation
or warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy or completeness (other than disclosures relating to UBS and its affiliates). MI information and opinions as
vvel as any prices indicated are current as of the date of this report, and are subject to change without notice. Opinions expressed herein may differ or be contrary
to those expressed by other business areas or divisions of U8S as a result of using different assumptions ancVor criteria. At any time U8S AG and other companies in
the UBS group (or employees thereof) may have a long or short position, a deal as principal or agent, in relevant securities or provide advisory a other services to
the issuer of relevant securities or to a company connected with an issuer. Some investments may not be readily reakzabk since the market in the securities is liquid
and therefore valuing the investment and identifying the risk to which you are exposed may be difficult to quantify. UBS relies on information barriers to control the
flow of information contained in one or more areas within U8S, into other areas, units, division or affiliates of UBS. Futures and options trading is considered risky.
Past performance of an investment is no guarantee fa its future performance. Some investments may be subject to sudden and large falls in value and on realization
you may receive back less than you invested or may be requied to pay more. Changes in Ex rates may have an adverse effect on the price, value or income of an
investment. We are of necessity unable to take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation and needs of our individual dients and we would
recommend that you take financial and/or tax advice as to the implications (induding tax) of investing in any of the products mentioned herein. This document may
not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of UBS or a subsidiary of 1185. UBS expressly prolibits the distribution and transfer of this document to
third parties for any reason. UBS via not be liable for any claims or lawsuits from any third parties arising from the use or distribution of this document. This report is
for distribution only under such circumstances as may be permitted by applicable kw. In developing the Chief investment Office economic forecasts, CIO economists
worked in collaboration with economists employed by UBS Investment Research. Forecasts and estimates are current only as of the date of this publication and may
change without notice.
External Asset Managers / External Financial Consultants: In case this research or publication is provided to an External Asset Manager or an External Financial
Consultant, UBS expressly prohibits that it is redistributed by the External Asset Manager or the External Financial Consultant and is made available to their clients and/
or third parties. Australia: 1) Clients of UBS Wealth Management Australia Ltd: This notice is distributed to clients of UBS Wealth Management Australia Ltd ABN
50 005 311 937 (Holder of Australian Financial Services Licence No. 231127), Chifley Tower, 2 Chifley Square, Sydney, New South Wales, NSW 2000, by UBS Wealth
Management Australia Ltd.: This Document contains general information and/or general advice only and does not constitute personal financial product advice. As such
the content of the Document was prepared without taking into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of any specific recipent. Prior to making any
investment decision, a recipient should obtain personal financial product advice from an independent adviser and consider any relevant offer documents (including any
product disclosure statement) where the acquisition of financial product is being considered. 2) Client of UBS AQ This notice is issued by UBS AG ABN 47 088 129
613 (Holder of Australian Financial Services Licence No 231087): This Document is issued and distributed by UBS AG. This is the case despite anything to the contrary
in the Document. The Document is intended for use only by "Wholesale Clients' as defined in section 761G ("Wholesale Clients') of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
("Corporations Act"). In no circumstances may the Document be made available by U8S AG to a 'Retail Client" as defined in section 7616 of the Corporations Act.
UBS AG's research services are only available to Wholesale Clients. The Document is general information only and does not take into account any person's investment
objectives, financial and taxation situation or particular needs. Austria: This publication is not intended to constitute a public offer or a comparable solicitation under
Austrian Law and will only be used under circumstances which will not be equivalent to a public offering of securities in Austria. The document may only be used by
the then recipient of this information and may under no circumstances be passed on to any other investor. Bahamas: This publication is distributed to private clients
of UBS (Bahamas) Ltd and is not intended for distribution to persons designated as a Bahamian citizen or resident under the Bahamas Exchange Control Regulations.
Bahrain: L185 AG is a Swiss bank not licensed, supervised a regulated in Bahrain by the Central Bank of Bahrain and does not undertake banking a investment
business activities in Bahrain. Therefore, Clients have no protection under local banking and investment services laws and regulations. Belgium: This publication is not
intended to constitute a public offering or a comparable solicitation under Belgian law, but might be made available for information purposes to clients of UBS Belgium
NV/SA, a regulated bank under the 'Commission Bancaire, Enanciere et des Assurances", to which this publication has not been submitted for approval. Canada: In
Canada, this publication is distributed to clients of UBS Wealth Management Canada by U8S Investment Management Canada Inc.. Dubai: Research is issued by UBS
AG Dubai Branch within the DIFC, is intended for professions clients only and is not for onward distribution within the United Nab Emirates. France: This publication
is distributed by UBS (France) S.A. French "societe anaiyme" with share capital of E 125.726.944, 69, boulevard Haussmann F-75008 Paris, R.C.S. Paris 8 421 255
670, to its clients and prospects. U8S (France) S.A. is a provider of investment services duly authorized according to the terms of the 'Code Monetaire et Financier",
regulated by French banking and financial authorities as the 'Banque de France" and the 'Autorite des Marches Financiers". Germany: The issuer under German Law
is U85 Deutschland AG, Bodcenheimer Landstrasse 2-4, 60306 Frankfurt am Main. UBS Deutschland AG is authorized and regulated by the "Bundesanstalt far
Finanzdienstleistungsaufsichr. Hong Kong: This publication is distributed to dents of UBS AG Hong Kong Branch by UBS AG Hong Kong Branch, a licensed bank
under the Hong Kong Banking Ordinance and a registered institution under the Securities and Futures Ordnance. India: Distrbuted by UBS Securities India Private Ltd.
2/F, 2 North Avenue, Maker Maxity, Banda Kuria Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai (India) 400051. Phone: +912261556000. SEBI Registration Numbers: NSE (Capital
Market Segment): IN8230951431, NSE (F&O Segment) INF230951431, BSE (Capital Market Segment) INB010951437. Indonesia: This research or publication is not
intended and not prepared for purposes of public offering of securities under the Indonesian Capital Market Law and its implementing regulations. Securitiesmentioned
in this material have not been, and will not be, registered under the Indonesian Capital Market Law and Regulations. Italy: This publication is din-touted to the clients
of UBS (Italia) S.pA., via del vecchio politecnico 3, Milano, an Italian bank duly authorized by Bar* of Italy to the provision of financial services and supervised by
"Consob" and Bank of Italy. U8S Italia has not participated in the production of the publication and of the research on investments and financial analysis herein
contained. Jersey: UBS AG, Jersey Branch, is regulated and authorized by the Jersey Financial Services Commission for the conduct of banking, funds and investment
business. Luxembourg: This publication is not intended to constitute a publk offer under Luxembourg kw, but might be made available for information purposes to
clients of 1185 (Luxembourg) S.A., a regulated bank under the supervision of the "Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF), to which this publication
has not been submitted for approval. Mexico: This document has been distributed by UBS Asesores MSc°, SA. de C.V., a company which is not subject to supervision
by the National Banking and Securities Commission of Mexico and is not part of U8S Grupo Financier°, S.A. de C.V. or of any other Mexican financial group and whose
obligations are not guaranteed by any third party. UBS Asesores Mexico, S.A. de C.V. does not guarantee any yield whatsoever. Singapore: Please contact UBS AG
Singapore branch, an exempt financial adviser under the Singapore Financial Advisers Act (Cap. 110) and a wholesale bank licensed under the Singapore Banking Act
(Cap. 19) regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, the analysis or report. Spain: This publication
is distributed to clients of UBS Bank, S.A. by UBS Bank, S.A., a bank registered with the Bank of Spain. UAE: This research report is not intended to constitute an offer,
sale or delivery of shares a other securities under the laws of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The contents of this report have not been and will not be approved by
any authority in the United Arab Emirates including the UAE Central Bank or Dubai Financial Authorities, the Emirates Securities and Commodities Authority, the Dubai
Financial Market, the Abu Dhabi Securities market or any other UAE exchange. UK: Approved by UBS AG, authorized and regulated in the UK by the Financial Services
Authority A member of the London Stock Exchange. This publication is distrbuted to private dients of UBS London in the UK. Where products or services are provided
from outside the UK, they will not be covered by the UK regulatory regime or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. USA: This document is not intended for
distribution into the US and / or to US persons. UBS Securities LLC is a subsidiary of U8S AG and an affiliate of U8S Financial Services Inc., UBS Financial Services Inc. is
a subsidiary of UBS AG.
Version 1/2013.
UBS 2013. The key symbol and UBS are among the registered and unregistered trademarks of UBS. Al rights reserved.
UBS Chief Investment Office May 2013
7
EFTA01089671
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Phone
+912261556000Wire Ref
refinancingWire Ref
reflationForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.