10/20/2010 17:01

10/20/2010 17:01 THE FLORIDA BAR PAGE 81/02 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Grievance Committee) TO. Bradley James Edwards Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, et al 425 N. Andrews Ave, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301-3268 IN RE: Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and The Florida Bar Against Bradley James Edwards, Attorney No. 542075 Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) OF NO PROBABLE CAU A LETTER OF ADVICE TO ACCUSED The grievance committee has found no probable cause in the above- you and the complaint was dismissed. In November 2009, The Florida Bar began an investigation into the Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA). According to a complaint filed by Herbert S in Case No. 09-34791-BKC-RBR, dated December 29, 2009, "[a]s p. defraud investors, [Scott Walter] Rothstein utilized the RRA offices, R his position as an attorney and as an owner and officer of RRA, in with existing clients of RRA and RRA's financial institution accounts, fraudulent sale of fictitious structured settlements." Thereafter, co alleged that you conspired with Mr. Rothstein to encourage plaintiffs to against Mr. Epstein to further Mr. Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. During the investigation of RRA, the bar discovered that Mr. R Rosenfeldt were the only equity shareholders in RRA. Despite partners, you held yourself out as a "partner" when you held no equity based upon the trust account improprieties at RRA, inquiry was made 4-1.5 and Chapter 5 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and believed during your tenure at the firm that RRA complied with all ap to its trust accounts. The bar also became aware of allegations that I engaged in actions that constituted violations of campaign finance lawyers at RRA were instructed to make political campaign cont reimbursed to the lawyer from funds at RRA. You responded to the inquiry and indicated generally that you were g reflect your legal experience and seniority within RRA. You never he partner and were unaware that anyone ever misunderstood that you Although you were familiar with the rules regarding trust accounts, yo any bank account at RRA and were not privy to the trust account ferenced matter against dissolution of Rothstein ttin, Chapter 11 Trustee, of his Ponzi Scheme to A lawyers and staff, and ition to his relationship n order to effectuate the plainant Jeffrey Epstein ring meritless civil suits tein and Stuart Alan having only two equity terest in RRA. Further, ether you had read Rule hether you reasonably icable rules with respect ers at RRA may have w. It was alleged that butions that were then en the title "partner" to yourself out as an equity were an equity partner. were not a signatory on ecords. You generally EFTA01113582 10/20/2010 17:01 THE FLORIDA BAR PAGE 02/02 observed that RRA appeared to have a professional structure and st trust funds. You denied having knowledge of any trust account irre accounts of Mr. Rothstein fleeing the United States and thereafter be You denied misrepresenting the value of claims against Mr. Epstei plaintiffs in the actions against Mr. Epstein commenced a year befo RRA and continues. You denied that you were ever reimburs contributions or that you were ever asked to do so. Rule 3-2.1(j) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar defines "probabl by an authorized agency that there is cause to believe that a member of of misconduct justifying disciplinary action." Here, the Committee co cause to believe that your conduct justified disciplinary action. Although the Committee did not find that your actions rose to a viola( The Florida Bar, the Committee members would caution you that situations and communications that could lead to confusion or attorneys who possess trust property or use a trust account are under a the safety of the property held in trust and compliance with the rule - The Committee understands that there is a national practice where firms use the title "partner." The Committee did not find any credib ever reimbursed for making campaign contributions or that you were e The Committee would direct you to review with care the Rules Regu 1.15 A lawyer shall comply with The Florida Bar Rules Regulating partner in a law firm, and a lawyer who individually or together wi comparable managerial authority in a law firm, shall make reasonabl firm has in effect measures giving reasonable assurance that all lawy Rules of Professional Conduct; 5-1.1 Trust Accounts; and, 5-1.2 Trus Procedures. This letter of advice does not constitute a disciplinary record against not subject to appeal by you. Rules Regulating The Florida Bar 3-7.4 purged from the discipline records and the file destroyed one year fro committee action. Dated this ark day of ..737u,n,:--s,, , 2010. NINTH JUDICIAL (ARC GR1 for the management of ularities before the news g prosecuted criminally. Your representation of you began working for for making campaign cause" as "[aj finding e Florida Bar is guilty d not find probable of the Rules Regulating I attorneys should avoid isinformation. Further, ontinuing duty to ensure regarding trust accounts. n-equity partners in law evidence that you were r asked to do so. ting The Florida Bar: 4- st Accounts; 4-5.1(a) A other lawyers possesses efforts to ensure that the s therein conform to the Accounting Records and u for any purpose and is ). This complaint will be the date of the grievance rr .E "B" THEODS DAVID ES cc: Kenneth H. P. Bryk, Bar Counsel Jeffrey Epstein, Complainant S, ACTING CHAIR EFTA01113583