Case File
efta-efta01188135DOJ Data Set 9OtherEye on the Market I
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01188135
Pages
5
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Eye on the Market I
February 19, 201
J.P.Morgan
Fifty Trades of Grey: an illustrated story of investment, temptation, addiction and the cost of money
Q I US retail sales were better than expected in January, despite higher tax rates, as the US consumer is still more active than
European counterparts (P' chart). It's too soon to see the full impact of higher US income and payroll tax rates, but a Q4 jump
in real wages, improved household balance sheets and a turnaround in housing may offset part of the headwind. We'll see in a
couple of quarters. Meanwhile, in the SOTU address, the President talked about raising revenues. It will be interesting to see
where they come from: after the recent tax act, top quintile tax rates are now 5 times higher than the second quintile, up from 2x
in 1979 as progressivity increases further (2nd chart). Everywhere I go, however, there's a different topic on everyone's minds:
what will happen when the Federal Reserve stops purchasing tens of billions in Treasury and Agency debt every month?
It's possible that with a sufficiently dovish Chairperson replacing Bernanke in 2014 that they will never end, and that the US
will end up like Ireland, with its Treasury perpetually beholden to its Central Bank; but I don't think so. The autobiographical
story below is my view on Fed purchases and their impact on the world of investing.
Auto sales: U-turns and Down-turns
Percent of total population,3 month moving average
6.5%
US
6.0%
5.5%
5.0%
4.5%
4.0%
3.5%
3.0%
2.5%
2.0%
2010
1998
2002
2006
Average federal individual Income and social Insurance
(FICA) tax rate by income group, Percent
30
2013E
25
Top 1%
20
Top Quintile
15
10
Middle Quintile
5
Second Quintile
0
Lowest Quintile
5
1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012
Fifty Trades of Grey
I was always the cautious type. I would wait until other people jumped into a lake to make sure it was deep enough. I have
never been on a motorcycle, and have never held or fired a weapon. I once rented a Maserati for a day to see what it was like,
and drove under the speed limit the entire time. So, it's not surprising that by the fall of 2007, with mounting problems in
housing, over-crowding in hedge fund strategies like statistical arbitrage and very low credit spreads, I got nervous and reduced
portfolio risk heading into 2008. The following fall, after the collapse, I imagined a slow and steady approach to reinvesting. It
would take time to rebuild confidence after the second 40% equity market decline in a single decade, right? After recessions in
1989 and 1999, you could take your time reinvesting in credit: high yield spreads remained elevated for 3 to 4 years, allowing
for a long, relaxed period of risk-taking by investors with the wherewithal to have avoided some of it in the first place.
Then one day in early 2009, everything changed. The Fed Chairman's picture in the paper reminded me of a cross between
Sean Connery and King Hussein of Jordan. His message was clear: Ile was going to shroud the markets in a warm embrace of
unbounded, limitless liquidity. It was slow at first, but then appeared everywhere I looked, like an endless, pounding summer
rain. The convertible bonds we bought in November 2008, and the commercial real estate-backed securities and leveraged loans
we bought the following spring, rose in a passionate revival of credit markets. During the first few months of 2009, you could
earn 10% or more on debtor-in-possession financing, and
Fifty Trades of Grey: Fed purchases of Treasury and
purchase private equity interests from overextended college
Agency securities, percentof total net supply issued
endowments at steep discounts. But by the late summer, as
(measured in 10-year equivalents, 6 month moving average)
50
the leaves turned, these opportunities began to fade as capital
70%
came back to credit markets. I held on tight, pulled in a
60.4 12 • 5
6 7
202. 1
-4911.2534544"
39
49
convulsion of rising optimism and the search for yield.
50,16
2
e 9
0
27
2e,
32
That's ancient history now. For the last fifty months, the Fed
40% -
lmi
has been buying Treasuries and Agencies, $2.5 trillion in all
(measured in 10-year equivalents). As the Fed ravishes the
20% -
ST
riskless debt markets, its demand now accounts for -55% of
10% -
the entire net supply issued by the Treasury, Ginnie Mae,
30% -
1 i. r
118
1 i
1
A
Lw n 222
10
25
1
.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. My relationship with the Fed
cry.
E
•
started to change: with its relentless debt purchases and 0%
10%
Jan-09 Jul-09 Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-12 Jan-13
policy rates, the Fed apparently sees me as a rentier capitalist
EFTA01188135
Eye on the Market I
February 19, 201
J.P. Morgan
Fifty Trades of Grey: an illustrated story of investment, temptation, addiction and the cost of money
whose savings should be expropriated by keeping short term interest rates below inflation. What's a rentier capitalist?
According to Lenin, someone who `clips coupons, who takes no part in any enterprise whatever, whose profession is idleness' .1
I began to question my feelings about Quantitative Easing, even though it led to a very powerful rally in the credit markets...
Global USD high yield markets
Basis points
2,250
2,000
1,750
1,500 -
1,250 •
1,000 •
750 -
500 -
250 •
0
1987
1992
1997
2002
2007
2012
Sowce:J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. Data shown as lower of yield/spread
to maturity and yield/spreadto call date.
Emerging markets US$ debt and high grade bonds
Spread, basis points
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1998
2001
2004
2007
2010
Sovereign
(EMBI Global
Diversified Index)
US High
Grade
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
2013
On the plus side for credit, companies have a lot of cash and cash flow and I do not see a recession brewing, so a messy break-
up between investors and credit markets seems unlikely this year based on fundamentals. Net of Fed purchases, there will be
almost no net debt new issuance2 in 2013, a very bullish supply picture. Furthermore, high yield companies have termed out
their debt substantially relative to where they stood in 2008, and there has been a revival in CLO and CMBS issuance as
structured credit markets improve. Remember as well that the Fed may not raise rates above 1% until 2015 (extrapolated based
on the pace of employment gains, labor force participation and the Fed's reported 6.5% unemployment threshold). For some
investors, every bit of coupon income counts: they will be loath to sell, and feel bound to hold their credit positions forever.
However, I'm also watching underwriting standards as investors weaken their emotional resolve. HY issues rated B- or below
are rising as a % of issuance. So are debt-to-cash flow multiples on leveraged buyouts, and in Q4 2012, payment-in-kind and
covenant-lite issuance hit 2007 levels. This month, Federal Reserve Governor Jeremy Stein voiced concerns about over-heating
credit markets, noting `reach for yield' behavior and deterioration in terms and conditions. While high yield spreads don't look
tight in an historical context, yields tell a different story. Given manipulation of riskless rates3, I am inclined towards caution.
`Long credit' is a crowded position, and dealer inventory/liquidity has declined given industry rule-changes (according to Citi,
high grade and high yield dealer inventories are 20% of 2007 levels). A period of diminishing credit returns is upon us, and
it's probably time for those with more than a normal credit allocation to begin saying goodbye's. It will not be easy; love
knows not its own depth until the hour of separation.
Maturity extension by high yield borrowers
Underwriting standards softening, but below prior peaks
US high yield bonds maturing, billions, USD
Debt/cash f low
500
70%
6x
450 •
LBO sr. debt
400-
60%-
to cash flow
%
multiple
350 -
50
5x
300 •
250 -
200 •
150 •
100 •
20%
50-
0
IPAs of Dec 2008
■As of Oct 2012
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019 2020 or
Vearot maturity
later
40%
30%
10%
0%
1997
2000
2003
2006
2009
2012
HY issues rated B- and
lower as % of total issuance
4x
3x
2x
Vladimir Lenin, "Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism", Section VIII, Parasitism and Decay of Capitalism. 1916.
2 Debt universe: high yield and high grade bonds, EM sovereign and corporate debt, municipals. Agencies, Treasuries and structured credit.
3 If you research estimates of the Fed's impact on long-term interest rates, you might be surprised at how low they arc. The latest paper on
the subject puts the impact at 35.45 basis points, and other studies show even lower estimates. See "The Federal Reserve's Large-Scale Asset
Purchase Programs: Rationale and Effects", D'Amico, Nelson, Lopez-Salido and English, December 2012.
4 The same view does not hold for credit hedge funds with minimal directional exposure to spreads or rates, and who seek to take advantage
of the decline in dealer inventory/market-making and resulting arbitrage opportunities that arise between bonds and credit default swaps.
2
EFTA01188136
Eye on the Market I
February 19, 201
J.P.Mor an
Fifty Trades of Grey: an illustrated story of investment, temptation, addiction and the cost of money
Once credit markets began to tighten, investors rushed headstrong into an intense love affair with dividend-paying stocks. The
S&P Dividend Aristocrats Index has outperformed the market by a huge margin starting in 2009, so much so that a few months
ago, cyclical stocks were trading at the largest discount on record relative to defensive ones, and still appear to be doing so.
Cyclical stocks still looking cheap to defensive ones
Ratio of cyclical stock P/Es to def ensives, using trailing earnings
1.8
1.6 -
1.4 -
1.2 -
1.0 -
0.8 -
0.6 -
Valuations of REITs and limber companies
Price to forward Adjusted Funds From Operations
25x
20x
15x
10x
0.4
5x
1973
1978
1983
1988
1993
1998
2003
2008
2013
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
PiE ratio
45x
40x
35x
30x
25x
20x
15x
10x
5x
What of equity market valuations overall? Has a dreaded Fed-driven overvaluation cycle already begun? It depends on the
lens you apply to remembrance of things past. Using 3 years of trailing earnings, the S&P 500 P/E multiple is around median
compared to the last hundred years, and reasonable at a time of low inflation. Using 5 years of earnings makes today's multiple
seem more expensive, since it inherently assumes that the earnings collapse in 2008 will occur every decade (I don't think this is
a good assumption). Some positives: market expectations of future long-term earnings growth are low, and there's a lot of
corporate and household cash lying around, the most in many decades on a combined basis. What about the equity market-to-
replacement cost ratios? It can be a useful buy/sell signal when it's at extremes, but that's not the case now. As for other equity
valuation methods, such as those which flatter stocks by looking at the fact that I am forced to earn zero percent on my cash, I
am trying to cast them aside: the deceptions we tell others are nothing compared to those we tell ourselves.
Reasonable valuations and a modest recovery in the US, China and parts of the developing world should keep the party
going. When inflation comes back and the Fed tightens, the party will likely end for a while, but at least right now the output
gap (a measure of spare US capacity) still looks large. I have even seen remarks by Bernanke's courtiers, Evans and Yellen,
indicating that the Fed will allow inflation to drift above its long term target for a while to ensure a recovery. In other words,
they will postpone the inevitable for as long as they can.
S&P 500 price to 3 and 5-year trailing average earnings
Multiple
34x
28x
2:14
16x
10x
4x
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Sou ce: Standard and Poor's, Robert ShierData Set, JPMAM. As reported
earnings used prior to 12/31/1988, operating earni ngs used after that date.
5-year
3-year
Tobin's O: not at extremes, and therefore less interesting
Ratio of market value to replacement cost of US non-financial comp.
2
1.8 -
1.6 -
1.4
1.2 -II
1 -II
0.8 -I
0.6
0.4
0.2 1
0-'
1900 1909 1919 1929 1939 1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999 2009
5 Tobin's Q looks at the ratio between the market value of equities and their replacement cost, using the Federal Reserve Report Z1, Table
B102. Values for 1900.1952 in the chart are based on estimates from Blanchard, Rhee and Summers ("The Stock Market, Profit And
Investment", National Bureau of Economic Research, 1990). Some analysts believe that Tobin's Q has been overstated in recent decades, as
intangibles make up a larger percentage of total assets. As an example, in 2009, a paper from The Conference Board estimated intangibles at
54% of total assets for US pharmaceutical companies, and at 43% of total assets for US technology companies.
3
EFTA01188137
Eye on the Market I
February 19, 201
J.P.Morganj
Fifty Trades of Grey: an illustrated story of investment, temptation, addiction and the cost of money
Lots of cash, everywhere
A proxy for spare capacity: the US output gap
Household and corporate cash balances,% of tangible assets
Actual output relative to a measure of full potential output (frOM CBO)
28
6% -
24
20
16
1952
1962
1972
1982
Positive output gap led
to Inflatbn
Plenty of room to
expand without inflation
-8%
1992
2002
2012
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Nevertheless, the end of the affair will come one day, and probably when I am not expecting it. Since the Greenspan-
Bernanke era of ultra-low policy rates began, the volatility of equities is even higher than before the creation of the Fed in 1913,
when the US was beset by frequent recessions and depressions. So here I remain, trapped in a cycle of market passions that
careen from sadness to ecstasy, and then back again. The ecstasy phase has more room to run for now, and we are seeing signs
that M&A activity (Berkshire Hathaway and 3G purchase of Heinz, Comcast purchase of GE assets, Liberty Media purchase of
Virgin Global) and share repurchases are picking up, which is generally good for stocks. The Fed is looking for 'substantial'
labor market improvement, which means there will probably be another 12 trades of grey before its purchases end. What kind of
imbalances will grow during this time? When the Fed stops buying riskless securities, we will find out how ready risky
securities are to stand on their own, and how addicted investors are to Fed support.
I remember the last time I was in this kind of tangled,
complicated relationship. It was in 2003: the Fed set policy
rates at 1%, below the rate of inflation, and set in motion
another cycle in which the value of cash was destroyed.
Incredibly, investors in US T-bills earned returns below the
rate of inflation until September 2005, which was well into
the recovery and around the time the housing collapse began.
Fed sponsorship of (another) housing boom and the credit
markets was great while it lasted, and I thought the affair
would never end. But it did end, with sadness and with
betrayal: when it came time for the Federal Reserve to warn
me about possible consequences of surging home ownership
costs, I didn't even get an email, or a salacious text. Instead,
I read one day in the newspaper that the subprime issue was
'contained'. Love means never having to say you're sorry."
Michael Cembalest
J.P. Morgan Asset Management
US home price to rent ratio, and periods of negative real
interest rates
140
135
130
125
120
115
110
105
100
95
90
Index.1 1 1970= 100
1975
1981
1986
1992
1997
2003
2008
1970
0%
-2%
-4%
-6%
1970
1975
1981
1986
1992
1997
2003
2008
Louis Federal Reserve
yli\
of
Negative returns on
3-month
T-bills
le Iry
6 Inflation was at the same level in 2003 as it was in 1997, yet policy rates were 4.5% higher in 1997. This is a point that Stanford's John
Taylor, a critic of current Fed policy, made last November at the Centennial Celebration of Milton Friedman at the University of Chicago.
7 The Fed had plenty of company: homeowners, banks, mortgage originators and guarantors, broker-dealers, rating agencies, US government-
sponsored enterprises, Congress, regulators and of course, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which by the year 2000,
required that 50% of all Fannie/Freddie origination went to affordable housing borrowers, which in turn resulted in a surge in 3% down-
payments. There have been a lot of rule changes in the financial system in response: so far, Dodd-Frank is 34% complete and has generated
over 11,000 pages of new regulations. On the other hand, half the volume of all home purchase loans from 2009 to 2011 were underwritten
by the Federal Housing Administration, Veterans Affairs and the Department of Agriculture with average down-payments of.....3%.
4
EFTA01188138
Eye on the Market I
February 19, 20
J.P.Morgan
Fifty Trades of Grey: an illustrated story of investment, temptation, addiction and the cost of money
BEA
Bureau of Economic Analysis
CMBS
Commercial mortgage backed securities
CLO
Collateralized loan issuance
CBO
Congressional Budget Office
RCA
Federal Insurance Contributions Act
QE
Quantitative easing
SOTU
State of the Union
TPC
Tax Policy Center (Brookings)
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: .IPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates do not provide tat advice. Accordingly. any discussion of U.S. far matters contained
herein (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used. and cannot be used. in connection with the promotion, marketing or
recommendation by anyone unaffiliated with .IPMorgan Chase & Co. of any of the matters addressed herein or for the purpose of avoiding U.S. tar-related
penalties. Note that J.P. Morgan is not a licensed insurance provider.
The material contained herein is intended as a general market commentary. Opinions expressed herein are those of Michael Cm:balest and may differ from those of other J.P.
Morgan employees and affiliates. This information in no way constitutes 1P. Morgan research and should not be treated as such. Further. the views expressed herein may differ
from that contained in LP. Morgan research reports. The above summarylpricesiquotes/stafistics have been obtained from sources deemed to be reliable. but we do not
guarantee their accuracy or completeness. any yield referenced is indicative and subject to change. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. References to the
performance or character of our portfolios generally refer to our Balanced Model Portfolios constructed by J.P. Morgan. It is a proxy for client performance and may nor
represent actual transactions or investments in client accounts. The model portfolio can be implemented across brokerage or managed accounts depending on the unique
objectives of each client and is serviced through distinct legal entities licensed for specific activities. Bank. Mal and investment management services are provided by JP
Morgan Chase Bank. N.A. and its affiliates. Securities are offered through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS). Member NYSE. FINRA and SIPC, and its affiliates globally as
local legislation permits. Securities products purchased or sold through JPMS are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"): are not deposits or
other obligations of its bank or thrift affiliates and are not guaranteed by its bank or thrift affiliates: and are subject to investment risks. including possible loss of the principal
invested. Not all investment ideas referenced are suitable for all investors. Speak with wurJ.P. Morgan Representative concerning your personal situation. This material is not
intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. Private Investments may engage in leveraging and other speculative practices that may
increase the risk of investment loss. can be highly illiquid. are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuations to investors and may involve complex tax structures and
delays in distributing important tax information. Typically such investment ideas can only be offered to. uitable investors through a confidential offering memorandum which
fully describes all terms. conditions. and risks. High yield bonds are speculative non-investment grade bonds that have higher risk of default or other adverse credit events
which are appropriate for high-risk investors only. Investments in commodities carry greater volatility than investments in traditional securities. There are additional risks
associated with international investing and may not be suitable for all investors. This material is distributed with the understanding that J.P. Morgan is nor rendering
accounting, legal or tar advice. You should consult with your independent advisors concerning such matters.
Bank products and services are offered by JPMorgan Chase Bank. NA. and is affiliates. Securities are offered by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. member NYSE. FINRA and
SIPC, and other affiliates globally as local legislation permits.
In the United Kingdom. this material is approved byJ.P. Morgan International Bank Limited (JPMIB) with the registered office located at 25 Bank Street. Canary Wharf.
London EN 5JP. registered in England No. 03838766 and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. In addition. this material may be distributed by:
!Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JPMCB) Paris branch. which is regulated by the French banking authorities Auto rite de Contra& Prudentiel and Atomise des Marches
Financiers: J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA. regulated by the Swiss Financial Market SupervisoryAuthority JPMCB Bahrain branch. licensed as a conventional wholesale bank by
the Central Bank of Bahrain (for professional clients only): JPMCB Dubai branch. regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority.
In Hong Kong. this material is distributed by JPMorgan Chase Bank. NA. (JPMCB) Hong Kong branch except to recipients having an account at JPMCB Singapore branch
and where this material relates to a Collective Investment Scheme (other than private funds such as private equity and hedge funds) in which case it is distributed byJ.P.
Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific)Limited (JPMSAPL). Both JPMCB Hong Kong branch and JPMSAPL are regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.
In Singapore. this material is distributed by IPMCB Singapore branch except to recipients having an account at JPMCB Singapore branch and where this material relates to a
Collective Investment Scheme (other than private funds such as a private equity and hedge funds) in which case it is distributed by LP. Aforgan (SEA.) Limited (JPMSEAL).
Both IPMCB Singapore branch and JPMSEAL are regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
With respect to countries in Latin America. the distribution of this material may be restricted in certain jurisdictions. Receipt of this material does not constitute an offer or
solicitation to any person in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorized or to any person to whom it would be unlawful to make such offer or
solicitation.
Each recipient of this presentation. and each agent thereof may disclose to any person. without limitation. the US income and franchise tax treatment and tax structure of the
transactions described herein and may disclose all materials of any kind (including opinions or other tax analyses) provided to each recipient insofar as the materials relate to a
US income or franchise tax strategy provided to such recipient by JPMorgan Chase & Co. and is subsidiaries. Should you have any questions regarding the information
contained in this material or about J.P. Morgan products and services. please contact your J.P. Morgan private banking representative. Additional information is available
upon request. "J.P. Morgan" is the marketing name for JPAforgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide. This material may not be reproduced or
circulated without J.P. Morgan's authority. Cl 2013 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved
5
EFTA01188139
Technical Artifacts (4)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Phone
3838766Phone
911.2534544Wire Ref
ReferencesWire Ref
referencedForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.