Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01191407DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Daniel Sabba .a

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01191407
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Daniel Sabba .a To: -Jeffrey E." cijeevacationgmail.com> CC: Paul Morris Vahe Slcpanian - Subject: RE: short crude vol strategy - follow-up analysis Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 22:49:54 +0000 Inline-Images: image(X11.png: image002.png: image003.png: image004.png: image005.png Richard Kahn Ctassificatm: Public Jeffrey, Our structuring desk did further analysis on the transaction - please see below. As discussed, let's speak further tomorrow morning. Below numbers are still as of E00 yesterday: here is the same table as earlier and additional explanation regarding what it means. Vol sulks *Mks 0s Roaleted Cl s - Seated kaalNa Canoe Ohs 604 334.a-1S 79% -1914 SA% WS 434 134..45 77% .33% 56% MKS 424 144**-1S 73% -31% 44 Let's focus on CL35 (April15) and similar applies to the other nodes. Vol strike was 43% and realized vol has been 77%. If the index had exposure only to this contract and not at all to the other contracts, and if realized vol up to expiry of this contract were also 77% then the implied-realized diff is 43%-77% = -34%. That is massive. This does not mean that you would lose 34% of the notional, but at least illustrates that you should expect the loss to be big. How much you actually lose is a daily path dependent calculation and cannot be summarized in a few sentences. If realized vol was EXACTLY same as implied vol also, the gain/loss would not be zero, but is a path dependent function. Back of the envelope, with a 34% implied-realized difference, one can expect a loss of 17% because the index has a vega of, on overage 0.5% of index notional; but at any given point in time even with vols unchanged, the vega could be anywhere between 0.33% and 0.67% (this is in steady state with vols unchanged, with changing vols, it could be a wider range). As we know, the strategy of the index is to sell 3 straddles (collecting premium); and delta hedges daily at the close (in other words, trades the gamma). One would expect to lose money trading the gamma and the thesis behind the index is that generally the money you lose trading the gamma < the premium collected. Since 13 Jan, on average the opposite has been true. Trading the gamma has been expensive because the underlying futures prices have moved a lot day to day, which is what we are trying to capture in the realized vol numbers shown above. The straddles are also marked to market daily using settlement prices; if implied vol has increased, there is a further loss on the mtm. The last column in the table above shows where current implied vol is. From: Daniel Sabba Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 1:30 PM To: 'Jeffrey E.' Cc: Paul Morris; Vahe Steparman; 'Richard Kahn Subject: RE: short crude vol strategy • follcnvop analysis Classificatcn: Public Jeffrey, Per my previous email, WTI moved down over 8% on Wednesday and up 7% on Tuesday. As discussed at our meeting, this level of high realized volatility is very negative to a short straddle with daily delta hedging strategy. We refreshed the analysis below to include the Tuesday's and Wednesday's moves. We would like to point out this trade has moved over 10% down, and ask you on whether you continue to want to hold it. Trade date: 13-3an Valuation date for all the numbers below: 4-Feb We have rounded various numbers for ease. Index return since trade date: -10.84% The index has lost money basically because realized vol has been much higher than implied, and also implied has gone up a lot (however, we wouldn't pay a lot of attention to the implied going up a lot; since finally what will count as more days pass is what realized is doing). Some stats on this are below. Vol sulks sect *Ike Roalludvo1 Implied - kallad Onset luswies CikS 60% 23-4,-1S 79% 19% OA% CUS 434 134.4, 15 77% '33% 56% CIAS 42% I44ke-IS 73% aim 54% This loss has occurred over a period of 15 Index Business Days. Looking back since index inception date, we tried to see how many times such a loss would have occurred over a period of 15 days. This 15 Index Business Day performance represents the 0.6th percentile. Daniel Sabba Key Client Partners Deutsche Bank Secunties inc. Tel Mobile Email EFTA01191407 From: Daniel Sabba Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 3:19 PM To: 'jeffrey E.' Cc: Paul Mcon; Vahe Stepanan; Richard Kant Subject: short crude vol strategy • follow-up analysis Classificancei: Public Jeffrey - this Is the analysis we put together and alluded to in the meeting today. It evaluates the performance of the short cmde vol strategy since Jan 13th. %nen we traded. As discussed. sharp naves up In oil (WTI is up 6% Intraday today) are also negative to a short straddle strategy that is delta hedged daily. as it causes realized vol to increase. potentially beyond expectations. If one expects the environment of hop realized vol to be short lived. the trade continues to make sense. If one expects rt to be a continued paradigm. it night make sense to revisit holding this strategy. Trade date: 13-3an Valuation date for all the numbers below: 2-Feb Me have rounded various numbers for ease. Index return since trade date: -4.7% The index has lost money basically because realized vol has been much higher than implied. Some stats on this are below. Cowan Vol sulks oaa Seiko Mated am Melee- Palld Owe* 04411164 C10/5 60% 144./15 67% 4% 614 CUS 43% 1344/45 65% 42% 50% C/K5 42% 14eKK/15 61% -2044 44% This loss has occurred over a period of 13 Index Business Days. Looking back since index inception date, I tried to see how many times such a loss would have occurred over a period of 13 days. This 13 Index Business Day performance represents the 6th percentile. Here is a graph showing performances over a 13 day period: 13d Return Dec-11 Dec-11 Dec-15 Also useful, below chart shows implied vol atm mid for the e l month futures over the last 1y: N11.10( WTI 211 rnpla4 wci Khd .mrles valattMy 5'14 vita 7/14 6/14 t1/14 fat 11/14 12/14 t'15 414 4/14 - /Mute WTI 2/4 imeee re me eephee weeny SOWN DteiCI* 6We 0100•11 Mat" Reen,J, iliceare• peel) And below is the sane chart over the last 10 years: 2:15 Orteres4 at IO 28 OIF oe.20, 5 EFTA01191408 WYMEX WTI 23.1implood 'el Mal implied volatility 100 00 00 " 1 ea 1 50 40 30 20 2CC9 2010 201! 31012 2013 2014 2015 2000 0O NYMEX WTI 2.1 Implied val Mid implied .01altlity Satin* Day!xn• Sank Ckskisil MAW* Restich t1100.10ve pnern) Cloweled 1x037. OSF•02015. This communication may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this communication in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this communication. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this communication is strictly forbidden. Deutsche Bank does not render legal or tax advice. and the information contained in this communication should not be regarded as such. EFTA01191409

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domaincijeevacationgmail.com
Phone4411164
Tail #N11
Wire Refrefreshed

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.