Case File
efta-efta01192635DOJ Data Set 9OtherAPOLLO
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01192635
Pages
7
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
APOLLO
Strictly Confidential
Intercompany Loan
A Discussion Document
September 10th, 2014
EFTA01192635
Key Considerations
The proposal is to interpose an intercompany note between AGM and APO Corp, which would be effected by way
of a dividend. The intercompany note should result in future ongoing interest deductions which should in turn
reduce AGM's ETR and cash taxes, which should in turn increase DNI and increase the trading price of AGM's Class A
Shares.
Key Considerations
Legal, tax or
reputational issues
Sizing and Pricing of the
Note
Tax Implications
• Conflicts and disclosure
• Compliance with tax covenants
• Compliance with credit facilities
• Commentary on Asset Manager peers
• Tax risk to AGM
• Note must be respected as debt for tax purposes
• Note must contains arm's length terms and reflect market pricing
• Consistency with AGM's dividend policy
■ Size must be limited to ensure deductibility
■ Impact on projections including an analysis of whether a valuation allowance
is required on the DTA
• For US Shareholders of AGM (tax rate differential between interest income
and qualified dividends)
• For Non-US Shareholders of AGM (increase in withholding for ADIA)
2
EFTA01192636
General Background and Discussion Points
The proposal is to interpose an intercompany note between AGM and APO Corp, which would be effected by way of a
dividend. The intercompany note should result in future ongoing interest deductions which should in turn reduce AGM's
ETR and cash taxes, which should in turn increase DNI and increase the trading price of AGM's Class A Shares.
ClassA Shareholders
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT, LLC ("AGM")
I son%
APO Asset Co LLC
1.3
A0G Partnerships
t
GP Carry
and AGM Co-Invest
which we-block'
which we don't need to "block'
which we -block"
for our AGII PIP
for ourAGII PIP
for ourAGM PTP
because incaneis not eliejble
because incaneMATiNt
becasseincomemnynotbeehible
for exemption
for exemption
for exemptico
APO Corp
Proposed Inttrcornpanv Note
between:
AGM as lender and
APO Corp as borronr
I —AOG Partnenhip Units
Founders and
AGM Class AShares—es
Contributing Partners
currently own 'AOC Partnership
Units'
CP
Professional Holdings, CP)
(Cayman)
58.7%
41.3%
58.7%
;LA
58.7%
A0G Partnerships
A0G Partnership - AMH
t
GP Carry
and AGM Co-Invest
t
Management Fees and Special Fees
3
EFTA01192637
APOLLO
Economic Impact — Cash Taxes
We arc proposing to issue a $950M note @ 6.74% coupon. The following tables shows the estimated impact on cash taxes:
Cash Tax Projection
!Yid
Budget
FY 'IS
Nam
FY'16
Pfau
FY '17
Plan
n"is
Plea
Pre-Tax DNI
1,232
892
1,236
1,130
1,552
Total Taxable Income
555
507
680
853
1,039
Cash Taxes @ Marginal Tax Rate
36.4%
35.9%
35.0%
37.2%
37.3%
Corporate Taxes
42
28
54
79
107
TRA Payment
37
39
40
42
44
Pretax Payment to Founders
115
102
142
183
229
Statutory Taxes
12
8
14
17
18
Total Cash Taxes
206
176
249
320
398
Effect allnaaawntalUeatItron ea Interest Expense to APO Carp
19
64
64
64
64
Pre-Tax DNI'
1,232
892
1,236
1,130
1,552
Corporate Taxes'
35
5
28
53
81
TRA Payment'
37
39
40
42
44
Pretax Payment to Founders°
104
67
103
144
189
Statutory Taxes'
12
8
14
17
18
Total Cash Taxes
189
119
185
255
333
Reduction in Cash Taxes (After-lax DNI Yiew)
18
57
65
65
65
Increase .n ON I Payments to Founders
11
34
39
39
39
Inaease in DNI Payments to Common Unit Holders
7
23
26
26
26
Net increase (decrease) in cash
(0)
-
-
-
'Pre•Tax DNI would remain unchanged, however after-tax DNI would increase by the amount of the tax benefit (which would incense DNI
cistributable to common shareholders by the same tax benefit)
'Overt year period corporate taxes are reduced by 5107M CM% avg. marginal rate on S275M of new interest expense
'TRA Payments are unchanged in total over the five year period but are deferred to later years due to the decrease in taxable income in initial years
'Total cash cgstributions to Founders remains the same (equivalent to the Founders share of pretax DNI). The reduction in corporate taxes and TRA
payments incenses the amounts the regular dividend payment to the Founders and decreases the pretax payment (gross-up) by an equivalent
amount
'Statutory taxes are unchanged as interest expense is at the P1,0 Corp level
the note was sized at $950M as Apollo
should keep its debt-to-equity ratio under
1.5 to 1 as calculated under §163(j). Staying
within these bounds allows AGM to benefit
from a "safe harbor" from rules that could
disallow deductions for interest expense
Corp Note Calculation
Note
950,000,000
Interest Rate
6.74%
Interest Expense
64,030,000
Months
12
Interest Expense Per Month
5,335,833
Sept 15th Issue Date
Months
3.5
2014 Interest Expense
18,675,417
Pretax Payment to Founders Rec
INIthOut Note With NOte
Difference
Tax Payments
79
72
7
Per Share
0.51
0.46
0
Founder Share
225.0
225.0
-
Pretax Payment
114.74
104.17
11
4
EFTA01192638
APOLLO
Economic Impact — ENI Tax Provision
The following table shows the estimated impact on AGM's Tax Provision:
ENI Tax P ojection
oommogo
Total ENI
I ncentive Co. - Pass thru ENI
Tax Base
Management Company Pre-Tax ENI
Management Company Tax Adjustments
Incentive Company Taxed ENI
Incentive Company Private Equity Taxed EN!
Incentive Company Credit/Real Estate Taxed ENI
Incentive Company Taxable Balance Sheet
PIC14
Budget
PIPIS
Pint
1,107
1,223
266
471
552
426
(243)
(272)
310
327
79
99
142
140
53
87
FY'16
Plan
FY '17
Plan
1,574
1,779
565
545
(128)
464
119
182
163
625
635
(53)
519
132
241
146
Total Tax Base
ENI Tax Provision
ENI Corporate Tax Provision
Tax True Up (Due to Changes in State Tax Rates)
Statutory Taxes
FY 'Is
Plan
1,666
493
675
(35)
498
88
287
123
619
481
881
1,101
1,138 .
222
3
11
178
10
333
10
419
10
444
10
Total ENI Provision
236
189
343
429
454
EN! Effective Tax Rate
GAAP Provision
Effect of Incremental $56 Million of Interest Expense
Total Tax Effect # 4035% Marginal Rate
ENI Tax Provision
21.3%
15.4%
21.8%
24.1%
27.3%
98
80
140
174
183
(19)
(64)
(64)
(64)
(64)
(7)
(26)
(26)
(26)
(26)
229
164
318
404
429
20.7%
13.4%
20.2%
22.7%
25.8%
GAAP Provision
91
55
115
149
158
Interest expense is at the
APO Corp level. As such,
the tax benefit for GAAP
and ENI Provisions are the
same.
2 Assumes $950M note at
6.74% coupon. Assumes
only 3.5 months of interest
expense for 2014.
5
EFTA01192639
Appendix
Pricing and Support
The credit rating, size and interest rate on the corporate note were determined based on comparison to existing Apollo
debt and industry benchmarks.
Intercompany Loan
The starting point for the credit rating was the ten year bonds we
recently issued in May 2014 @ 4% with an A- rating, but given the
following factors we concluded that a BB is appropriate for the
intercompany loan:
1.
The 4% Bonds issuance is guaranteed by the APH and
AMH entities and the APO borrowings from related
parties is not guaranteed.
2.
In bankruptcy proceedings third party debt is (and in fact
many other payments to third parties are also) senior to
related party debt. Thus, related party debt is
structurally subordinate to debt like that in the I44A
issue.
3. The APO loan includes a PIK provision and prepayment
rights without penalty.
[ Characteristics of the Intercompany
Loan
Rating:
Maturity:
Amount:
Int. Rate:
Convertibility:
BB
10 years
$5OOm - $1,OOOm
5.22% - 7.07%
None
6
EFTA01192640
APOLLO
Appendix — Pricing and Support (
Given the above features, we ran a screening of all recently issued comparable fixed income securities. We ran two
analyses, each based on a different set of comparable securities:
I.
a broader Finance industry including diversified firms and banks
2.
a set focused on the Capital Market sector including asset management firms
Both analyses arrived at similar ranges with Median Interest Rates of 6.13% and 5.93%, respectively.
Transfer Pricing Study — Interest Rate Analysis
We engaged Deloitte to assist with a Transfer Pricing Study to help determine the optimal characteristics of the potential
intercompany financing. Based on their finding, a similar 10 yr loan would require a rate between 5.22% and 7.07%,
with a median of 6.21%.
Notes
Min
Low ()-
tile
Median Up Q-tile
)Jax
10-Year Note
8-Year Note
5-Year Note
5.22%
5.57%
6.21%
6.74%
7.07%
5.00%
5.34%
5.97%
6.52%
6.83%
111
4.20%
4.53%
5.15%
5.72%
6.02%
3-Year No all
3.18%
3.47%
4.06%
4.70%
4.93%
7
EFTA01192641
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Wire Ref
Transfer PricingForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.