Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01200817DOJ Data Set 9Other

Joint Statement of Brad Edwards, Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz Regarding

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01200817
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Joint Statement of Brad Edwards, Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz Regarding Settlement Brad Edwards, Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz have today settled their pending defamation claims in which Edwards and Cassell sued Dershowitz and Dershowitz counterclaimed against Edwards and Cassell. The case was about Dershowitz's public claims that Edwards and Cassell, as the attorneys fo had helped her make up her false allegations of sexual misconduct against Ders owitz. e p amtiff-attorneys denied that contention and asserted that it defamed them. The lawsuit involved only whether the lawyers performed the necessary due diligence to make their allegations in good faith, not whether the acts of alleged misconduct in fact ever occurred. Dershowitz countersued Edwards and Cassell, alleging they had falsely accused him of sexual contact wia—a claim he vigorously denied. Edwards and Cassell maintain that they made their client's allegations in good faith and performed the necessary due diligence to do so. , WHAT DOCUMENTS RICK? and have pretkeeek4oeurrteitts-tletailing-iliese-effen.ar Dershowitz_revhi4e-not-disputina tatemento that the underlying alleged mioconduct may have oecuned with oomcone, maintains his complete innocence of that misconduct. Dershowitz has produced travel and other records for the relevant times which he-relies-en4e-establishes that he could not have been present when the alleged misconduct was said to have occured-eoeursock and-thanust-have-m.istaken hitn4er-setneene-else The parties believe it is time to take advantage of the new information that has come to light on both sides during the litigation and put these matters behind them. Given the events that have transpired since the filing of the legal filings in which Dershowitz was accused of misconduct, including the court order striking the allegations in those filings, and the records produced by the parties, Edwards and Cassell acknowledge that it was a mistake to have named Dershowitz in the stricken filings, and the sexual misconduct accusations made in the filings are hereby withdrawn. For the same reason, Dershowitz withdraws the accusations that Edwards and Cassell acted unethically. Neither Edwards, Cassell, nor Dershowitz have any intention of repeating the allegations against one another. EFTA01200817

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

STATEMENT BY ALAN DERSHOWITZ

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
House OversightUnknown

Alleged criminal extortion plot discussed during Alan Dershowitz's 2015 Broward County deposition

Alleged criminal extortion plot discussed during Alan Dershowitz's 2015 Broward County deposition The passage references a claim that Alan Dershowitz disclosed a criminal extortion scheme involving unnamed clients during a deposition, and mentions related defamation lawsuits. While the details are vague and unverified, the involvement of a high‑profile attorney and a federal courtroom provides a concrete lead (date, location, parties) that could be pursued. The claim is moderately controversial and potentially sensitive, but it lacks clear novelty and specific financial details, limiting its score. Key insights: Dershowitz allegedly told lawyers Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell that "your clients were involved" in a criminal extortion plot.; The statement was made on October 15, 2015, during a deposition in Broward County, Florida.; Bradley and Cassell had sued Dershowitz for defamation, and Dershowitz had filed a countersuit.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM

66p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alleged Links Between Bradley Edwards, Rothstein’s Ponzi Scheme, and Jeffrey Epstein’s Non‑Prosecution Agreement

The passage suggests a chain of actors—Bradley Edwards, lawyer Alan Dershowitz, and the late financier Rothstein—who may have leveraged Epstein’s alleged non‑prosecution agreement for extortion or bla Bradley Edwards joined Rothstein’s firm in April 2009 and allegedly showed Epstein‑related documents Rothstein’s wealth is claimed to stem from a $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme running since 2005. Edwards

1p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein Child Sex Trafficking Investigation – FBI Records, Deleted Pages, Non‑Prosecution Deal, High‑Profile Connections

The compiled documents reveal a dense web of FBI case files, internal forms, and communications that reference Jeffrey Epstein’s illegal sexual activities with minors, a secret non‑prosecution agreeme FBI case number 31E‑MM‑108062 repeatedly references ‘Child Locate’ entries and deleted pages (b6, b7 Multiple internal FD‑515 forms list Jeffrey Epstein as a subject (named explicitly on 09/30/2008 e

181p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.