Case File
efta-efta01204264DOJ Data Set 9OtherIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01204264
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CIVIL DIVISION: "AG"
CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXAM
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,
Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. /
ORDER GRANTING COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE having came before the Court upon Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's
Motion for Summary Judgment. Having reviewed the law and case file, having heard argument
of counsel and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, the Court hereby determines as
follows:
Plaintiff /Counter-Defendant,
Jeffrey
Epstein
("Epstein")
filed
suit
against
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley Edwards ("Edwards"). Edwards then filed a counter-claim
against Epstein. Epstein subsequently dismissed his Complaint without prejudice. The counter-
claim proceeded, undergoing several amendments. As it now stands, the Fourth Amended
Counterclaim has two causes of action: abuse of process and malicious prosecution. Epstein
moved for summary judgment arguing that the litigation privilege applies to both the abuse of
process and malicious prosecution claims. This Court agrees and grants summary judgment in
favor of Epstein.
EFTA01204264
The Court thoroughly reviewed Levin, Middlebrooks, Moves & Mitchell v. U.S. Fire Ins.
Co., 639 So. 2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994), Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole,
950 So. 2d 380 (Ha. 2007), and Wolfe v. Foreman, 38 Fla. L. Weekly D1540 (July 17, 2013).
These cases provide the binding precedent in this area of law. All actions occurring during the
course of a judicial proceeding are absolutely privileged, so long as the actions have some
relation to the underlying proceeding. Levin, Middlebrooks, Moves & Mitchell v. U.S. Fire Ins.
Co., 639 SO. 2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994). This position was reaffirmed in Echevarria. In Wolfe, the
Third District Court of Appeal, quoting in large part from Echevarria, found specifically that the
litigation privilege applies to malicious prosecution claims and acts occurring during the course
of a judicial proceeding, if those" acts bear some relation to the proceeding.
Edwards urged the Court to find that Olson v. Johnson, 961 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 2d DCA
2007), is in conflict with Wolfe, thereby allowing the Court to find that the privilege does not
apply. However, Olson is inapplicable, because that case involved false statements made to a
police officer prior to the judicial proceeding. The court found that the privilege did not apply,
and that the malicious prosecution claim was not barred.
At the hearing on the motion, Edwards conceded that all of the allegations made in both
the abuse of process and malicious prosecution claims are of acts, occurring during the course of
a judicial proceeding and bear some relation to the proceeding. Therefore, the Court finds that
the absolute litigation privilege applies to both the abuse of process and malicious prosecution
claims made herein. The Court also notes that the cases cited by Edwards involved malicious
prosecution claims stemming from actions filed by the party themselves, not counsel. in the
instant case, it was conceded that all filings were done by an attorney in good standing with the
Florida Bar, rather than by the individual party. Accordingly, it is
EFTA01204265
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for
Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County,
Florida, this /fday of May 2014.
Copies furnished to attached service list
EFTA01204266
SERVICEL1ST
CASE NO. 502009CA0408003OOOCMB-AG
W. Chester Brewer, Jr., P.A.
250 S. Australian Avenue
Suite I400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Jack Scar
Searcy Denney Scarob et al
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Jack Goldber er Es uire
tter ury, o
erger
eiss, .A.
250 S. Australian Avenue
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Marc Nurik, Esquire
I East Broward Blvd.
Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
BratHe
Edwards,
.
Esquire
Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman
425 N. Andrews Avenue
Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
1 Financial Plaza
Suite 2612
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
Ton'a Haddad Col
E airs
Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A.
315 SE 716 Street, Suite 301
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
EFTA01204267
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
07/29/2011 14:05 FAX 5616845816
9p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019
Epstein Depositions
10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps
839p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH
45p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00020703
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.