Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01308890DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01308890

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01308890
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
06-22-06 Recarey 05-368 On Friday June 16, 2006, I met with ASA Lana Belohlavic at the tate Attorne 's Office to discuss the arrest warrant request for Jeffrey Epstien, and . ASA Belohlavic stated she had been ill during the week of June 9 and part of the week of June 16, 2006. According to ASA Belohlavic , During that time State Attorney Barry Krisher met with the defense council of Jeffrey Epstein. They discussed the fact, that due to the strict regulations in the Virgin Islands, where Epstein resides, the original charges would classify Epstein as a sexual offender. Therefore, the State Attorney agreed to seek a felony solicitation of prostitution charge. This new charge would not classify Epstein as a sex offender. I explained to ASA Belohlavic that I did not agree with the charge and requested they seek the original charges requested on the warrant. ASA Belohlavic presented a letter written by the defense council to State Attorney Barry Krisher. The letter stated the strict regulations for sexual offenders in the Virgin Islands, and depicted the victim, SG, on www.mvspace.com. According to the defense council, SG lied on her personal profile, therefore should not be considered a credible witness. I explained to ASA Belohlavic that www.mvspace.com does not verify any information which is placed on the personal profiles. Defense council explained that based on the fact that the personal profile, which includes ages, income and personal information, was not accurate, and should not deem SG as a credible witness. ASA Belohlavic stated that she and State Attorney Barry Krisher are officially requesting a new probable cause affidavit reflecting their new charge of solicitation of prostitution. I told ASA Belohlavic I found that to be an irregular practice as I have never been asked to submit a new probable cause affidavit. I further advised her although I was not the official representative of the police department, I would not re-write a new probable cause affidavit for Epstein. I further explained that the original probable cause I submitted with the arrest warrant request, was the entire cast and the information would not change. I returned to the police department and briefed Sgt Dean and Capt Gudger of what transpired. On June 19, 2006, I made telephone contact with ASA Belohlavic. ASA Belohlavic provided the Florida State Statute she was told to charge Epstein. The F.S.S. 796.07 4(c) would make the solicitation of prostitution a third degree felony. The statute read "A felony in the third degree for a third or subsequent violation." I explained to her that I felt this charge was designated for the repeat offender or three separate convictions of solicitation. ASA Belohlavic stated she read the statute as three separate occasions. I explained to her that Administration was consulted and they felt the new probable cause affidavit request was unwarranted. CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00329834 EFTA_00202560 EFTA01308890

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.