Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01371108DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01371108

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01371108
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
31 October 2017 Railroads Canadian Rails Shares of rail companies have consistently outperformed the market since 2000, generating an average annualized return of 16.5% (including dividend reinvestment) compared to 5.1% for the S&P 500. CNI has been the strongest performer with a 19.8% CAGR while CSX has been the group's laggard (15.4% CAGR) due largely to a lower dividend yield. During this time, shares of railroad companies have experienced three major up-cycles with two periods of extended weakness. Outperformance and/or underperformance within the group have been driven by a number of different factors throughout different cycles, though recently investors have been more eager to reward companies for potential margin expansion. The first major major up-cycle for the industry lasted from 2000 until 2008. As seen below, CNI was the clear winner during this time as the company expanded its network through a number of acquisitions, generated best-in-class volume growth, and removed costs through the implementation of Hunter Harrison's Precision Railroading model. { Figure 73: The rails solidly outperformed the S&P 500 from 2000-2008 with CNI leading the way 700 600 SOO OX 300 200 100 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2006 2006 2007 Sam Aria* &ni. ApaS4s After peaking in May 2008, railroad shares fell 60% on average, underperforming the broader market (the S&P 500 fell 50% peak to trough). This makes sense to us given the aforementioned run-up and higher fixed cost nature of the rail industry. To this point, earnings for the group were down 26% on average in 2009 on a 19% reduction in revenue. We note that CSX declined the most peak to trough in 2008/09 (due to its run-up ahead of the recession) followed by CP as Consensus EPS forecasts for 2009 fell 56% vs. 37% on avg. for the rest of the group. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc Page 35 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0064305 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_002104139 EFTA01371108

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2104139

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.