Case File
efta-efta01752624DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceEFTA Document EFTA01752624
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01752624
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
Joscha Bach
Subject:
The benefits of deception
Sent:
Thursda
November 7 2013 12:40:54 AM
To:
Joi Ito
. Kevin Slavin
Martin Nowak
, Epstein Jeffrey <[email protected]>, Ad Gesher
, takashi ikegami
Beyond the fact that deception is a behavior that attempts to manipulate the mental states (esp. beliefs
and goals) of other agents towards what the deceiver believes to be counterfactual, there is the question
of the function and benefits of deceit.
Deception does not only include malicious lying and exploitation, but also humor, didactics, politeness,
tact, consideration of possible fallacies in my own current beliefs and so on, and thus plays many
beneficial roles in human interaction and cooperation.
Today, I had an interesting conversation with a student. She asked (starting out from the context of
ubiquitous surveillance and post-privacy): imagine everybody knew everybody else's thoughts all the
time, would this increase or reduce the amount of strife between people?
We could generalize this question: if humans were incapable of any kind of deception, would the net
effect on human interactions, the functioning of organizations, or on societies, a positive or a negative
one? Obviously, the impossibility of knowing betrayal and fraud will yield some positive effects. On the
other hand, the need to accept and forgive traits, ideas and intentions of people that are culturally or
psychologically very different will put a heavy strain on relationships. Furthermore, it might become
harder to forge and maintain alliances with and against other players, possibly resulting in fewer gains
through competition and specialization.
Could there be a way in which we can estimate, or at least gain an intuition on the net benefits of the
human capability for deception? Imagine a simulation of a market place with many different players, or a
day in a kinder garden, or a hospital. Could we model beliefs, desires and intentions of the individual
agents, and then run the simulation once with the usual amount of deceit, and once with all agents
having access to complete and truthful information about the beliefs, desires and intentions of everybody
else?
Cheers,
Joscha
PS: Looking very much forward to be seeing some of you on Monday ;-)
EFTA_R1_00051468
EFTA01752624
Related Documents (6)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.