Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-019228House Oversight

Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct and Deferred Prosecution Irregularities in Jeffrey Epstein Case

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-019228
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct and Deferred Prosecution Irregularities in Jeffrey Epstein Case The passage suggests possible misconduct by federal prosecutors in negotiating a deferred prosecution agreement for Jeffrey Epstein, citing alleged false testimony, lack of required communications, and questionable legal strategy. It names specific individuals (Mark Filip, Jeffrey Herman) and hints at irregularities that could merit further investigation into prosecutorial decisions and potential conflicts of interest. Key insights: Testimony claims no interstate communications meeting §2422(b) occurred.; Women allegedly lied about ages to gain access, contradicting claims of victim coercion.; Deferred prosecution agreement described as irregular and beyond typical prosecutorial scope.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversighthigh-importancejeffrey-epsteinprosecutorial-misconductdeferred-prosecution-agreementsex-traffickingfederal-prosecution
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Letter to Judge Mark Filip requesting cessation of federal prosecution, signed by Kenneth Starr and others

Letter to Judge Mark Filip requesting cessation of federal prosecution, signed by Kenneth Starr and others The passage mentions high‑profile legal figures (Judge Mark Filip, former special prosecutor Kenneth Starr, U.S. Attorney Acosta) asking to end federal involvement in an unspecified case. It lacks concrete details about the underlying matter, transactions, dates, or wrongdoing, offering only a generic claim of federal overreach. While the involvement of notable officials gives some investigative value, the absence of specifics limits actionable follow‑up. Key insights: Request to halt federal prosecution and defer to state jurisdiction; Signed by Kenneth Starr, former independent counsel; Addressed to Judge Mark Filip, a federal judge

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
House OversightUnknown

Allegations of Prosecutorial Impropriety in Jeffrey Epstein Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Allegations of Prosecutorial Impropriety in Jeffrey Epstein Deferred Prosecution Agreement The passage suggests possible misconduct by federal prosecutors in negotiating Epstein's deferred prosecution, citing contradictions in statements and a potential conflict with state jurisdiction. It names a high‑level official (Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip) and references the USAO, offering a concrete lead for further inquiry, but lacks specific financial details or new revelations, placing it in the moderate‑lead range. Key insights: Claims federal prosecutors pressured for a longer sentence than the state desired.; Alleges a false statement by attorney J. Sloman about the SDFL's willingness to defer incarceration.; Mentions a deferred prosecution agreement that was later altered to 18 months plus house arrest.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Kavanaugh‑Era DOJ Letter from Kenneth Starr’s Firm Requests Review of Federal Prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein

The fax shows senior former counsel (Kenneth Starr) and a DOJ Deputy Attorney General (Mark Filip) being asked to intervene in a federal case against Jeffrey Epstein, citing political pressure tied to Letter signed by Kenneth W. Starr (former counsel) on behalf of Epstein’s defense. Requests Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip to review a proposed federal prosecution. Alleges that the USAO in Miami

3p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01965864

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USAFLS)

(USAFLS) From: Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:25 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: draft letter to DAG I t.'"...1. ;Or • > EXHIBIT B-127 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014941 57 EFTA00224728 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Airs: Assistant LAS Auorney 99N.& eth Street Aftam: Ft 33132 (305) 961-9100 DELIVERY BY FEDERAL EXPRESS June 2, 2008 Honorable Mark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Judge Filip, Jeffrey Epstein is a part-time resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating allegations that, over a two-year period, Epstein paid approximately 28 minor females from Royal Palm Beach High School to come to his house for sexual favors. In July 2006, the matter was presented to AUSA A. Marie Villafana of our West Palm Beach b

14p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.