Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-023007House Oversight

U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta met with Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer at Marriott hotel to negotiate plea arrangement

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-023007
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta met with Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer at Marriott hotel to negotiate plea arrangement The passage identifies a concrete meeting between a high‑ranking former U.S. Attorney (Alexander Acosta) and Epstein’s counsel, suggesting a possible quid‑pro‑quo or influence on the plea deal. It provides a specific location, timeframe, and parties, offering actionable leads for subpoenaing hotel records, communications, and DOJ review documents. While the connection between Acosta and Epstein has been reported, the detail about the Marriott meeting and the addendum negotiations adds moderate new investigative value. Key insights: Meeting took place at the Marriott hotel, 1001 Okeechobee Blvd., West Palm Beach; Alexander Acosta (U.S. Attorney) met with Epstein’s attorney to discuss plea terms; An addendum requiring a special master for victims’ civil compensation was contested

Tags

kagglehouse-oversighthigh-importanceepsteinplea-dealalexander-acostau.s.-attorneylegal-negotiations
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

AO 93 (Rev. 5/85) Search Warrant

AO 93 (Rev. 5/85) Search Warrant United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF In the Matter of the Search of (Name, address or brief description of property Of premises to be searched) One PNY Technologies 128 Megabyte CompactFlash memory card, marked THNCF128MMAITOOCB) 999223 TAIWAN 0247 in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Investigation TO: Ej States: FLORIDA SEARCH WARRANT CASE NUMBER 08 8068-LRJ FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION , and any Authorized Officer of the United Af I idavit(s) having been made before me by E. believe that who has reason to Affiant r] on the person of or [Xi on the premises known as insole, description and/or locahon) One PNY Technologies 128 Megabyte CompactFlash memory card, marked THNCF128MMAITOOCB) 999223 TAIWAN 0247 in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, 505 S. Flagler Drive, Suite 500, West Palm Beach, Florida in the SOUTHERN District of concealed a certain person or property, namely Idescobo ine pers

19p
House OversightUnknown

Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict

Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict The passage provides concrete names (Jeffrey Sloman, Acosta, Lefkowitz, Starr) and dates (2008, 2013) showing possible obstruction of victim notifications in the Epstein case, suggesting a lead for investigating DOJ and FBI decision‑making. While it ties high‑level officials, the claim of pressure from Epstein’s attorneys is not yet corroborated, limiting the score to the high‑mid range. Key insights: Jeffrey Sloman, top aide to U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, planned to notify Epstein victims after a plea deal was signed.; Lefkowitz warned Acosta that the office had promised not to contact victims or potential claimants.; Federal prosecutors resumed the FBI investigation and interviewed witnesses in NY and NM while plea negotiations continued.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida , FL 33401 Facsimile: December 7, 2007 DELIVERY BY UNITED STATES MAIL Re: Crime Victims' Rights — Notification of Resolution of Epstein Investigation Dear Miss- Several months ago, I provided you with a letter notifying you of your rights as a victim pursuant to the Justice for All Act of 2004 and other federal legislation, including: (1) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused. (2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding involving the crime or of any release or escape of the accused. (3) The right not to be excluded from any public court proceeding, unless the court determines that your testimony may be materially altered if you are present for other portions of a proceeding. (4) The right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court involving release, plea, or sentencing. (5) The reasonable right to confer wi

3p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014046

0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01660015

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.