Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01340325Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01340325

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01340325
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

November 23, 2021 FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO 28 C.F.R. § 16.8 AND 5 U.S.C. § 552 By E-mail And By FTP Alison Moe, Esq. Assistant United States Attorney One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 WILMERHALE Anjan Sahni Re: August 11, 2019 Grand Jury Subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Chase Bank USA, N.A., and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC; August 16, 2019 and September 3.2019 Grand Jury Subpoenas to JP Morgan Chase; October 9.2019 Grand Jury Subpoenas to

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
November 23, 2021 FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO 28 C.F.R. § 16.8 AND 5 U.S.C. § 552 By E-mail And By FTP Alison Moe, Esq. Assistant United States Attorney One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 WILMERHALE Anjan Sahni Re: August 11, 2019 Grand Jury Subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Chase Bank USA, N.A., and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC; August 16, 2019 and September 3.2019 Grand Jury Subpoenas to JP Morgan Chase; October 9.2019 Grand Jury Subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. And All Affiliates Dear Ms. Moe: In response to the above-referenced subpoenas and to your request by email on November 22, 2021, on behalf of our client JPMorgan Chase ("JPMorgan" or the "Firm"), we submit the enclosed encrypted zip file containing account documentation bates labeled JPM- SDNY-00065519 through JPM-SDNY-00065530. As discussed on November 22, 2021, this production includes account documentation related to account number Q 78859-00-8 in the name of ASW Holdings, Inc. We also wanted to provide the following additional information about the documents in our November 22, 2021 production. The 021 production included account documentation related to account numbe in the name of Financial Trust Company, Inc. (JPM-SDNY-00065487 through JPM-SDNY-00065493); account documentation related to account numbe in the name of Jeffrey Epstein (JPM-SDNY-00065494 -SDNY-00065499); and account documentation related to account number in the name of Ghislaine Maxwell (JPM-SDNY-00065500 through JPM-SDNY- 00065518). Should you require any additional materials, please do not hesitate to contact us. * * * Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, 28 C.F.R. § 16.8, and any other applicable law, rule, or regulation, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Don LLP requests on behalf of JPMorgan that confidential treatment be accorded to this letter (Bates numbered JPM-SDNY-CL-012-000l through JPM-SDNY-CL-012-0003) and the referenced materials (Bates numbered JPM-SDNY-00065519 through JPM-SDNY-00065530 on JPM- Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase JPM-SDNY-CL-012-0001 SDNY_GM_02775073 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00261713 EFTA01340325 WILMERHALE November 23, 2021 Page 2 SDNY-VOL-012) (collectively, the "Confidential Material"). Accordingly, the Confidential Material has been marked "Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase." The Confidential Material contains confidential business information concerning JPMorgan. Furthermore, public disclosure of the Confidential Material could reasonably be expected to cause substantial competitive harm to JPMorgan. Accordingly, the Confidential Material is subject to, without limitation, Exemption 4 of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552(bX4), and the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, and will continue to remain exempt from mandatory disclosure even after the conclusion of the Department of Justice's ("Department") consideration of this matter. We note further that, since the Confidential Material constitutes investigatory records obtained by the Department in connection with a potential law enforcement proceeding, such records are subject, at least at present, to the exemption from mandatory disclosure under Exemption 7(A) of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552(bX7)(A).' Since the documents pertain to the activities of JPMorgan, its employees, and its clients and their employees and agents, and not to the activities of any federal agency, JPMorgan also believes the documents are exempt from disclosure pursuant to Exemption 7(C) of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7XC).2 Should any third person request the opportunity to inspect or copy the Confidential Material pursuant to the FOIA or otherwise, we request on behalf of JPMorgan that the undersigned immediately be notified of such request and be furnished with a copy of all written materials pertaining to such request (including but not limited to the request and any agency determination with respect to such request). JPMorgan expects that it will be given an opportunity to object to such disclosure. And, should the Department be inclined to grant any such request, it is JPMorgan's expectation that, pursuant to the procedures required by 28 C.F.R. § 16.8, and Exec. Order 12,600, 52 Fed. Reg. 23,781 (1987), we will be given reasonable advance notice of any such decision to enable our client to pursue any remedy that may be available to it.3 In such event, we request that you telephone the undersigned rather than rely upon the United States mail for such notice. If the Department is not satisfied that the submission is exempt from disclosure pursuant to the FOIA, we stand ready to supply further particulars. The requests set forth in the preceding paragraphs also apply to any memoranda, notes, recordings, or other writings of any sort whatsoever which are made by, or at the request of, any employee of the Department (or any other government agency) and which (I) incorporate, include, or relate to any of the information contained in the Confidential Material; or (2) refer to any conference, meeting, telephone conversation, or interview between (a) our client's current or former employees, associates, representatives, agents, auditors, or counsel and (b) employees of the Department (or any other government agency). 2 3 See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase JPM-SDNY-CL-012-0002 SDNY_GM_02775074 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00261714 EFTA01340326 WILMERHALE November 23, 2021 Page 3 This letter is not intended to, and does not, waive any applicable privilege or other legal basis under which information may not be subject to production. * * * If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at the above-referenced number. Sincerely Anjan Sahni Enclosure Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase JPM-SDNY-CL-012-0003 SDNY_GM_02775075 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00261715 EFTA01340327

Link to Specific Page

Share a direct link to a specific page in this document:

https://epsteinexposed.com/documents/sd-10-EFTA01340325?page=[page_number]

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 650

The United States Attorney's office requests that the court exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act from April 1, 2022, to April 22, 2022, due to pending post-trial motions in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense counsel consents to this request. The court had previously excluded time through April 1, 2022, to allow the parties to research and brief post-trial motions.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

court filing: Case1:20-cr-00320-AJN Document 332 Filed 07/28/20 Page 7 of 7

The government opposes the defendant's motion to restrict the government's use of materials gathered in a criminal case, arguing that such restrictions are unprecedented and without legal basis. The government requests that the court enter its proposed protective order and deny the defendant's motion. The document is a submission by the Acting United States Attorney to the court.

1p
Court UnsealedAug 19, 2019

Letter Motion

Letter Motion, USA v. Epstein, No. 1:19-cr-00490-1 (S.D.N.Y. Aug 19, 2019)

3p
Court UnsealedJul 2, 2020

Maxwell Detention Memo

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 4 Filed 07/02/20 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -v.- : : GHISLAINE MAXWELL, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) : Defendant. : ---------------------------------------------------------------x THE GOVERNMENT’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DETENTION AUDREY STRAUSS Acting United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United Stat

10p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The Government, represented by Audrey Strauss, requests the Court to schedule a date approximately 1...

The Government, represented by Audrey Strauss, requests the Court to schedule a date approximately 180 days in the future to update the Court on its position regarding sealing in the case. The request is made by Assistant United States Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz. The document is a court filing in the case presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 306

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, stating that the parties in the Ghislaine Maxwell case do not propose any redactions to the court's June 25, 2021 Opinion and Order or certain exhibits. The parties have no objection to the public filing of these documents without redactions.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.