Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01371108Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01371108

31 October 2017 Railroads Canadian Rails Shares of rail companies have consistently outperformed the market since 2000, generating an average annualized return of 16.5% (including dividend reinvestment) compared to 5.1% for the S&P 500. CNI has been the strongest performer with a 19.8% CAGR while CSX has been the group's laggard (15.4% CAGR) due largely to a lower dividend yield. During this time, shares of railroad companies have experienced three major up-cycles with two periods of ext

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01371108
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

31 October 2017 Railroads Canadian Rails Shares of rail companies have consistently outperformed the market since 2000, generating an average annualized return of 16.5% (including dividend reinvestment) compared to 5.1% for the S&P 500. CNI has been the strongest performer with a 19.8% CAGR while CSX has been the group's laggard (15.4% CAGR) due largely to a lower dividend yield. During this time, shares of railroad companies have experienced three major up-cycles with two periods of ext

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
31 October 2017 Railroads Canadian Rails Shares of rail companies have consistently outperformed the market since 2000, generating an average annualized return of 16.5% (including dividend reinvestment) compared to 5.1% for the S&P 500. CNI has been the strongest performer with a 19.8% CAGR while CSX has been the group's laggard (15.4% CAGR) due largely to a lower dividend yield. During this time, shares of railroad companies have experienced three major up-cycles with two periods of extended weakness. Outperformance and/or underperformance within the group have been driven by a number of different factors throughout different cycles, though recently investors have been more eager to reward companies for potential margin expansion. The first major major up-cycle for the industry lasted from 2000 until 2008. As seen below, CNI was the clear winner during this time as the company expanded its network through a number of acquisitions, generated best-in-class volume growth, and removed costs through the implementation of Hunter Harrison's Precision Railroading model. { Figure 73: The rails solidly outperformed the S&P 500 from 2000-2008 with CNI leading the way 700 600 SOO OX 300 200 100 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2006 2006 2007 Sam Aria* &ni. ApaS4s After peaking in May 2008, railroad shares fell 60% on average, underperforming the broader market (the S&P 500 fell 50% peak to trough). This makes sense to us given the aforementioned run-up and higher fixed cost nature of the rail industry. To this point, earnings for the group were down 26% on average in 2009 on a 19% reduction in revenue. We note that CSX declined the most peak to trough in 2008/09 (due to its run-up ahead of the recession) followed by CP as Consensus EPS forecasts for 2009 fell 56% vs. 37% on avg. for the rest of the group. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc Page 35 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0064305 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_002104139 EFTA01371108

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2104139

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeNov 19, 2025

HOUSE OVERSIGHT 016696-Palm-Beach

November 12, 2025 release of Jeffrey Epstein documents by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Microsoft Excel Spreadsheets converted to PDF. Originals in NATIVES/001 folder

139p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01371118

31 October 2017 Railroads Canadian Rails Profitability [roads CP reported operating income of C$2.6bn in with a company-best and near best in class operating ratio of 58.6% in 2016. Over the past ten years, CP's EBIT has increased at an 8.6% CAGR on just 3.1% revenue CAGR as the company was able to reduce its operating ratio by nearly 1,700bps. The majority of this improvement came during Hunter Harrison's tenure as CEO (see figure below) when the operating ratio improved 1,600bps from

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

1 May 1 1255-May 6 237_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins me: Sent Tn: Subject: Atladimem: LT. THOMAS E. ALLEN JR Thomas S. Allen. Jr. Sunday. May BIL EDIE 12:55 AM Allyson FL Dwell; Brenda McKin1e?c C. Kay Wandring: Caitlyn D. Neff: Daniel?le Minarch?lck: JeFFrey' T. Hite; Jon D. Fisher. Jonathan M. Mfl?n-der. Joseph 5. Kolenorluan Mendez: Kevin T. Jeirles; [any Lidgett Lee R. Shea??er: Lorinda L. Brown.- Matti-new T. Fishet: Melanie Gordan; Michael S. Woods Richard C. 5mm; Shephanie D. Calander?mtus Report SMDIE 20150501004

493p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01371097

31 October 2017 Railroads Canadian Rails Figure 30: Employee productivity. as measured by GTMs per employee (in M) 25 20.1 20 19.0 20.0 14.6 Ui "18 1,200 1,100 1,061 1,000 15 13.3 900 -110 I- us 800 700 5 600 0 500 Figure 31: Fuel efficiency, as measured by GTMs per gallon of diesel consumed CM CP UNP NSC CSX Sans Dead. Sint CoVenv 1,035 I 880 I 801 919 I CM CP UNP NSC CSX Sens Genes art &Man Map Compensation/labor related costs are the largest componen

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01371113

31 October 2017 Railroads Canadian Rails CP Company Overview Canadian Pacific - headquartered in Calgary, Canada, was formed as a passenger rail shortly after Canada's confederation in 1867 to connect the eastern provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick with Canada's central provinces of Quebec and Ontario. A few years later, Manitoba joined the confederation with the promise that a transcontinental railroad would be built within 10 years. Construction of the railway was challenged in

1p
Dept. of JusticeMar 11, 2011

FBI Bruce E Ivins Investigation

010347Anthrax Page 1 of 1274 (Rev. 01-31-2003) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION o Precedence: To: From: ROUTINE Date: 02/01/2007 Washington Field Washington Field Squad AMX-1/~VRA Contact: SAl ~--~~--------------------------~ b6 Approved By: Drafted By: Case ID #: 279A-WF-222936 ~79A-WF-222936-BEI (Pending) .. {{t;1%l.O (Pending)-1 279A-WF-222936-BEI-FISUR (Pending) -/ Title: AMERITHRAX; MAJOR CASE 184 ....?,-;-~"$'- Synopsis: Opening of sub-files for the'--'.:9a'ptioned matter. D

1274p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.