Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01377705Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01377705

S-1/A Method can be a useful alternative to explicitly modeling all PWERM scenarios, in situations where the company has transparency into one or more near term exits, but is unsure about what will occur if the current plans fall through. An advantage of the hybrid method is that it takes the advantage of the conceptual framework of option-pricing theory to model a continuous distribution of future outcomes and to capture the option-like payoffs of the various share classes while also explic

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01377705
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

S-1/A Method can be a useful alternative to explicitly modeling all PWERM scenarios, in situations where the company has transparency into one or more near term exits, but is unsure about what will occur if the current plans fall through. An advantage of the hybrid method is that it takes the advantage of the conceptual framework of option-pricing theory to model a continuous distribution of future outcomes and to capture the option-like payoffs of the various share classes while also explic

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
S-1/A Method can be a useful alternative to explicitly modeling all PWERM scenarios, in situations where the company has transparency into one or more near term exits, but is unsure about what will occur if the current plans fall through. An advantage of the hybrid method is that it takes the advantage of the conceptual framework of option-pricing theory to model a continuous distribution of future outcomes and to capture the option-like payoffs of the various share classes while also explicitly considering future scenarios and the discontinuities in outcomes that companies may experience. To determine the Fair Value of one share of common stock, we relied on the Hybrid Method, in which we utilized the PWERM to allocate the value under certain Initial Public Offering (IPO) scenarios, and the OPM to allocate the value under scenarios other than an IPO (the All Other scenario). We then applied an appropriate weighting to each scenario. Our 102 Table of Contenh selection of this equity allocation method was primarily based on our stage of development, estimated time to liquidity, and capital structure, as well as our expectations for a possible IPO. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Under the JOBS Act. we meet the definition of an emerging growth company. We have irrevocably elected to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act. In May 2014. the FASB issued an accounting standards update that will replace existing revenue recognition guidance. Among other things, the updated guidance requires companies to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The guidance can be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. We have not yet selected a transition method and are evaluating the impact of adopting this new accounting standard update on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In August 2015. the FASB issued an accounting standards update, which amended the current standard to provide a one-year deferral of the effective date, as well as providing the option to early adopt the standard on the original effective date. Accordingly, we may adopt the standard in either our fiscal year ending December 31, 2017 or 2018. The guidance can be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. We have not yet selected a transition method and are evaluating the impact of adopting this new accounting standard update on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In August 2014. the FASB issued an accounting standard update under which management will be required to assess an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. The new guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and for annual and interim periods thereafter. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have an effect on our financial statements or disclosures. In April 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standards update under which the debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The amendment is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We have early adopted this new guidance, which did not have any effect on our financial statements. In April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance that will help entities evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement by providing guidance as to whether an arrangement includes the sale or license of software. This guidance will be effective for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We do not believe the pending adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. In July 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standards update, which will simplify how we measure inventory. The current guidance requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. Market could be replacement cost, 103 http://vAvw..us:. gov/A rehi vestedgaddata/1512673AX$11193125 I 5369092/d937622dsla.htm111/6/2015 7:37:12 AMJ CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. GRIM. P. 6(e) CONFIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0074856 SDNY_GM_00221040 EFTA01377705

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone5369092
URLhttp://vAvw..us

Related Documents (6)

OtherUnknown

FEDWIRE PAYMENT DEBIT ADVICE

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01273102

16p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01467567

Subject: RM0081851 Daily Deposit Re ort 20140307 From: PBW/WM/MIS ETL/PBW 15116 Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 02:23:15 -0500 To: RM CODE ACCT 1 81851 03/06/14 LARGE, ZERO AND NEGATIVE BALANCES NAME CAT BALANCE OD AMOUNT 35266976 EFFREY EP TEIN 37989772 37993173 42942688 SUMMIT EQUITIES LLC 42952763 SOUTHERN TRUST COMPANY, INC. 42952771 SOUTHERN FINANCIAL LLC 42953440 HYPERION AIR, INC 42953459 JEGE, INC 42953475 JEGE, LLC 42953707 DARREN K. INDYKE PLLC 42953715 HBRK ASSOCIATES, I

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01279955

OMB Approval No. 2502-0265 Good Faith Estimate (GFE) Name of Originator Fifth Third Joann Brown Mortgage Company Borrower Originator 5001 Kingsley DR Address HD: 1MOCHQ Cincinnati, OH 45227 Propcny Address Ori nator Phone Number Originator Email Date of GFE October 03, 2014 Purpose Shopping for your loan This GFE gives you an estimate of your settlement charges and loan terms if you are approved for this loan. For more information, see HUD's Special Information Booklet on seu

3p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01286246

Deutsche Bank Deutsche Bank Trust Co. America% 34S Park Avenue - NYC20-0102 New York. NY 10154 BUTTERFLY TRUST 6100 RED HOOK QUARTER. B3 ST. THOMAS 00802 UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS June 1.2016 to Jun< 30. 2016 Summary' of Aitoun1 Balance(%) Account Accoing Number Balance For personal assistance call: Paul Morris Balance Elite Money Market Denait Beginning Balance as of lime I. 2016 52.98 $2.98 Deposits and Other Credits 50.00 Cheeks Paid W.00 ATM and Debit Card Withdra

3p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01491870

J.P.Morgan FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY INC ACCT. For the Period 11/1/10 to 11/30/10 Trade Settlement Date Date Type Description Per Unit Realized Quantity Amount Market Cost Tax Cost GairVLoss Settled Securities Purchased 11/22 11/26 Purchase SPUR SSP 600 E7F TRUST 45,000.000 119.77 (5,389,650.00) 5,389,850.00 AS OF 11)26/10 SUB-ACCOUNT: MGN Total Settled SecurMes Purchased ($10.651.861.02) 110,651,861.02 60.00 Account Page 9 of 9 Page 54 of 57 Confidential Treatme

1p
OtherUnknown

cell

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01345718

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.