Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
Settled: $242M combined

USVI v. Epstein Estate & Victim Compensation

USVI Superior Court | Superior Court, U.S. Virgin Islands

USVI Settlement
$117M (2022–2023)
EVCP Distributed
~$125M (~150 claims)
2026 Class Action
$25–35M (pending)
Combined Total
~$242,000,000+
USVIEstateSettlementVictim CompensationClass Action

The USVI Lawsuit

Filing and Allegations (January 2020)

On January 15, 2020, the U.S. Virgin Islands Attorney General filed a civil enforcement action against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The complaint alleged that Epstein used the territory's laws, tax incentives, and geographic isolation to build and operate a sex trafficking enterprise centered on his private islands, Little St. James and Great St. James. The USVI alleged that Epstein's companies received approximately $300 million in tax benefits from the territory while he used the islands to traffic and abuse victims, some of whom were minors brought to the Virgin Islands from the mainland United States and abroad.

The Islands

Little St. James, a 70-acre island purchased by Epstein in 1998, served as the primary location for his trafficking activities in the Caribbean. Epstein subsequently purchased the larger neighboring island of Great St. James in 2016. Both islands featured significant construction, including the main residential compound, guest houses, a helipad, and other structures. The USVI alleged that Epstein restricted access to the islands and used private aircraft and boats to transport victims, making detection and escape effectively impossible.

USVI Settlement ($117 Million)

Terms of Settlement

The estate agreed to pay $105 million in cash plus one-half of the net proceeds from the sale of Little St. James island. The combined total ultimately reached $117,282,494.01, with full payment completed by December 31, 2023. The settlement resolved the USVI government's civil claims but did not preclude individual survivors from pursuing separate actions.

Disposition of the Islands

As part of the settlement, the estate was required to sell Little St. James. The proceeds were divided between the USVI government and the estate. Great St. James was also subject to sale proceedings. The ultimate disposition of the properties served as a tangible marker of the dismantling of Epstein's physical infrastructure in the territory.

Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP)

Program Design

The Epstein Victims' Compensation Program was launched on June 25, 2020, as a voluntary claims-based process administered by Jordana Feldman, an experienced claims administrator. The program was funded by the Epstein Estate and designed to provide financial compensation to survivors without requiring them to pursue individual litigation. Claimants were required to submit detailed accounts of their abuse and supporting documentation. In exchange for compensation, participants agreed to release legal claims against the estate.

Claims and Distribution

Approximately 225 claims were submitted to the EVCP. After review, roughly 150 claims were determined to be eligible for compensation. The program distributed between $121 million and $125 million in total payments to qualifying survivors. Individual awards varied based on the nature, severity, and duration of the abuse documented in each claim. The EVCP closed in August 2021 after completing its review and distribution process.

Significance

The EVCP was one of the largest victim compensation programs in sex trafficking history. It provided a path to restitution for survivors who might otherwise have faced years of litigation against the estate. However, some critics noted that accepting EVCP payments required survivors to waive future claims. a trade-off that some found difficult given the scope of the abuse and the ongoing revelations about Epstein's network.

2026 Class Action Against Co-Executors

Settlement Announcement (February 19, 2026)

On February 19, 2026, the Epstein Estate agreed to a class action settlement of $25 to $35 million with additional survivors who brought claims against co-executors Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn. The plaintiffs alleged that Indyke and Kahn, who served as Epstein's personal attorneys and later as co-executors of his estate, aided and abetted Epstein's sex trafficking enterprise through their management of his financial and legal affairs.

Settlement Structure

The settlement amount is variable: $25 million if fewer than 40 individuals are determined to be eligible class members, and $35 million if 40 or more qualify. This sliding scale was designed to ensure adequate per-claimant compensation regardless of class size. The settlement remains pending judicial approval as of early 2026.

Case Timeline

Feb 19, 2026
Estate agrees to $25-35M class action settlement against co-executors (pending judicial approval)
Jan 1, 2024
Class action filed against co-executors Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn
Dec 31, 2023
Full USVI settlement payment of $117,282,494.01 completed
Dec 1, 2022
USVI settlement reached: $105M cash plus one-half of Little St. James sale proceeds
Aug 1, 2021
EVCP closes after distributing ~$125M to approximately 150 eligible survivors
Jun 25, 2020
Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP) launched under administrator Jordana Feldman
Jan 15, 2020
USVI Attorney General files civil enforcement action against Epstein Estate

Key Persons

Combined Victim Compensation Summary

Program / ActionAmountBeneficiariesStatus
USVI Government Settlement$117,282,494USVI governmentPaid in full
EVCP (Victim Compensation)~$121-125M~150 survivorsClosed (Aug 2021)
Class Action v. Indyke/Kahn$25-35MAdditional survivorsPending approval
Combined Total~$242,000,000+

Related Cases

Disclaimer: This page presents information compiled from USVI Superior Court filings, settlement agreements, the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program public statements, and published reporting. Survivor names have been redacted to protect privacy. The 2026 class action settlement is pending judicial approval and its terms may change. Inclusion of any individual's name does not imply guilt or criminal conduct. Users are encouraged to consult primary sources for complete context.