Legal analysis of Sixth Amendment right to counsel and CVRA venue provisionsHistorical letter between Thomas Jefferson and James Madison cited in House Oversight document
Case Filed-1616House OversightThe defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that Accuser-3's evidence is not direct evidence o...
Unknown1p1 persons
Case File
d-1616House OversightThe defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that Accuser-3's evidence is not direct evidence o...
Legal Filing
The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that Accuser-3's evidence is not direct evidence of the sex trafficking conspiracy charged in Count Five and should be excluded under Rule 404(b) and Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The government had argued that Accuser-3's evidence is admissible to prove the sex trafficking conspiracy, but the defense counters that the government's arguments are meritless and based on flawed assumptions.
Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1616
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.