Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-19299House OversightDeposition

Testimony in House Oversight case shows no direct evidence linking Alan Dershowitz to alleged misconduct at Epstein's residence

The passage repeats already‑public allegations and the witness’s lack of knowledge, offering no new names, dates, or financial details. It confirms that the witness did not observe any wrongdoing by D Witness Rodriguez testifies Dershowitz was at Epstein’s home when young women were present. Rodriguez states Dershowitz read a book, drank wine by the pool, and stayed inside; no direct intera Rodrig

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #010747
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage repeats already‑public allegations and the witness’s lack of knowledge, offering no new names, dates, or financial details. It confirms that the witness did not observe any wrongdoing by D Witness Rodriguez testifies Dershowitz was at Epstein’s home when young women were present. Rodriguez states Dershowitz read a book, drank wine by the pool, and stayed inside; no direct intera Rodrig

Tags

sexual-misconduct-allegationsexual-misconduct-allegationsalan-dershowitzlegal-exposuretestimonyhouse-oversightcourt-recordepstein

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 306 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2015 Page 13 of 19 Q. And did you have any knowledge of why [Dershowitz] was visiting there? A. No ma’am. Q. And do you have any idea whether or not Mr. Dershowitz was also receiving massages? A. I don’t know, Ma’am. Q. As to whether any of those women were ever associated with Mr. Dershowitz would it be a correct statement that you have absolutely no knowledge? A. I don’t know, sir. Q. Okay. Were you in any way attempting in your response to Ms. Ezell to imply that Mr. Dershowitz had a massage by one of these young ladies? A. I don’t know, sir. Q. You have no knowledge? A. No, sir. (Rodriguez Depo. Tr. at 279, 280, 385, 386.) To be sure, Rodriguez does testify that Prof. Dershowtiz was at Epstein’s home when young females were present at the home — an allegation which Dershowitz strenuously denies. However, Rodriguez did not testify that Prof. Dershowitz saw, interacted with, or touched any of these females. Instead, when asked what Prof. Dershowitz did “while those girls were at the house,” Rodriguez answered “He will read a book with a glass of wine by the pool, stay inside.” (Id. at 426, 427.) When asked if Prof. Dershowitz ever even spoke to any of the girls, or “even knew that they were there” Rodriguez answered “I don’t know.” (Id. at 427.) This is consistent with the fact that Epstein’s home is very large and has separate closed-off quarters where Epstein resided. Prof. Dershowitz never stepped into these private quarters. Jane Doe #3 also relies upon the September 8, 2009 deposition testimony of Mr. Juan Alessi to “corroborate” Jane Doe #3’s sensational and false allegations regarding Prof. Dershowitz. However, a more complete examination of that testimony reveals that Alessi did not make any allegations of any wrong doing by Dershowitz. (See, DE 291-17, hereinafter 13

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

House OversightApr 9, 2019

Empty Exhibit Provides No Investigative Leads

Empty Exhibit Provides No Investigative Leads The document contains only a title and no substantive content, offering no names, dates, transactions, or allegations to pursue. It lacks any actionable information, controversy, novelty, or linkage to powerful actors. Key insights: Document consists solely of a header and exhibit label.; No factual statements, allegations, or references to individuals or entities are present.

1p
House OversightFeb 2, 2015

Dershowitz Seeks Intervention in Epstein Victims’ CVRA Case, Citing Alleged False Accusations Involving Clinton, Gore, and Prince Andrew

Dershowitz Seeks Intervention in Epstein Victims’ CVRA Case, Citing Alleged False Accusations Involving Clinton, Gore, and Prince Andrew The filing outlines a contested claim that Alan Dershowitz was defamed in a victim‑rights case and references unverified allegations that former President Bill Clinton, former Vice President Al Gore, and Prince Andrew were present on Jeffrey Epstein’s island. While the document is primarily a procedural brief, it hints at possible undisclosed contacts and financial motives that could merit further fact‑checking, especially the detailed anecdotal accounts of high‑profile figures. However, the lead lacks concrete evidence, dates, or transaction data, limiting its immediate investigative utility. Key insights: Dershowitz argues the allegations against him were fabricated and surfaced only in a 2014 joinder motion.; The brief cites Jane Doe #3’s sworn statements claiming Bill Clinton and Al Gore were on Epstein’s island, with specific (but unverified) details.; Reference to Prince Andrew’s alleged lobbying for a more favorable plea arrangement in the NPA.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
House OversightMay 25, 2017

Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell – Oral Argument Docket (Southern District of New York, March 31, 2017)

Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell – Oral Argument Docket (Southern District of New York, March 31, 2017) The document is a routine court docket listing parties, counsel, and judge for an oral argument. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful actors beyond the already public parties. As such, it offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Case number: 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS); Judge: Hon. Robert W. Sweet; Plaintiff: Virginia L. Giuffre

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition of Prof. Paul Cassell alleges Alan Dershowitz’s involvement in Jeffrey Epstein sex‑trafficking and possible concealment of evidence

The transcript contains multiple specific allegations linking a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network, references to flight logs, a ‘black book’, a non‑p Cassell claims the pleading alleges Dershowitz abused [REDACTED - Survivor] and “other minors” based on a He asserts that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about Dershowitz, s

76p
House OversightOct 17, 2015

Deposition of Prof. Paul Cassell alleges Alan Dershowitz’s involvement in Jeffrey Epstein sex‑trafficking and possible concealment of evidence

Deposition of Prof. Paul Cassell alleges Alan Dershowitz’s involvement in Jeffrey Epstein sex‑trafficking and possible concealment of evidence The transcript contains multiple specific allegations linking a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network, references to flight logs, a ‘black book’, a non‑prosecution agreement, and possible obstruction of investigations. It names dates, documents, and individuals (e.g., [REDACTED - Survivor], Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova) that could be pursued for corroboration, document requests, or subpoenas. The claims are unverified but, if true, would be a major scandal involving a prominent legal figure and a billionaire sex‑trafficker, making it a high‑value investigative lead. Key insights: Cassell claims the pleading alleges Dershowitz abused [REDACTED - Survivor] and “other minors” based on an 89‑page Palm Beach Police report listing 23‑24 victims.; He asserts that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about Dershowitz, suggesting a pattern of concealment.; Cassell references flight logs showing Dershowitz traveling with Epstein and a woman named “Tatiana” (potentially a minor) in 1998‑2005.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.