Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-20521House OversightDeposition

Depositions Reveal Potential Obstruction and Fifth‑Amendment Claims by Epstein Co‑Conspirators

The passage cites multiple sworn depositions (including Epstein, Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, Adriana Mucinska Ross) that reference Fifth Amendment refusals and alleged procurement of young girls. Epstein deposition (Mar 8, 2010) includes claim of counsel pressure to stay silent. Attorney Edwards conducted multiple depositions of Epstein; transcripts attached to motion. Co‑conspirators (Sarah

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #010587
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage cites multiple sworn depositions (including Epstein, Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, Adriana Mucinska Ross) that reference Fifth Amendment refusals and alleged procurement of young girls. Epstein deposition (Mar 8, 2010) includes claim of counsel pressure to stay silent. Attorney Edwards conducted multiple depositions of Epstein; transcripts attached to motion. Co‑conspirators (Sarah

Tags

legal-obstructioninvestigative-leadssexual-abusefinancial-fraudfifth-amendmentobstruction-of-justicedepositionlegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightepsteinsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
fabricating cases of a sexual nature fleecing unsuspecting Florida investors and others out of millions of dollars for cases of a sexual nature with--I'd like to answer your questions; however if I--I'm told that if I do so, I risk losing my counsel's representation; therefore I must accept their advice." Epstein deposition, March 8, 2010, at 106 (Deposition attachment #10). 56. | When Edwards had the opportunity to take Epstein’s deposition, he only asked reasonable questions, all of which related to the merits of the cases against Epstein. All depositions of Epstein in which Mr. Edwards participated on behalf of his clients are attached to this motion. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit “N” at §11 and Deposition attachments #1, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 13. Cf. with Deposition of Epstein taken by an attorney representing BB (one in which Edwards was not participating), http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-dqoEyY Xx4; and http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=Y CNiYItW-10 57. Edwards's efforts to obtain information about Epstein’s organization for procuring young girls was also blocked because Epstein’s co-conspirators took the Fifth. Deposition of Sarah Kellen, March 24, 2010 (hereinafter “Kellen Depo.”) (Deposition attachment #14); Deposition of Nadia Marcinkova, April 13, 2010, (Deposition attachment #9); Deposition of Adriana Mucinska Ross, March 15, 2010 (hereinafter “Ross Depo.”) (Deposition attachment #15). Each of these co-conspirators invoked their respective rights against self- incrimination as to all relevant questions, and the depositions have been attached. 58. At all relevant times Edwards has had a good faith basis to believe and did in fact believe Sarah Kellen was an employee of Epstein’s and had been identified as a defendant in at least one of the complaints against Epstein for her role in bringing girls to Epstein’s mansion to be abused. At the deposition, she was represented by Bruce Reinhart. She invoked the Fifth on 22

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

URLhttp://www.youtube.com
URLhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-dqoEyY

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Epstein Palm Beach house operations reveal staff involvement, cash payments and alleged police contributions

The passage provides concrete details about staff roles, cash handling, and a claim that Epstein made large contributions to the Palm Beach Police, which could merit follow‑up. However, the informatio Four staff members (Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, Marcinkova) were named in the FBI inve House manager Alfredo Rodriguez claimed he was instructed to keep $2,000 cash on hand for payments

2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein communications reveal possible DA leniency, police donations, and $1M transfer to modeling mogul Jean‑Luc Brunel

The document strings together several actionable leads: Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance’s alleged failure to enforce housing restrictions on a Level‑3 sex offender; documented cash gifts to the Palm Beach Po Cyrus Vance Jr. allegedly ignored housing‑guideline violations for Epstein’s Upper East Side residen Epstein gave $100,000 to the Palm Beach Police Department and received police‑department hats for

13p
House OversightUnknown

Jeffrey Epstein communications reveal alleged police payoffs, modeling‑agency trafficking links, and possible DA leniency

Jeffrey Epstein communications reveal alleged police payoffs, modeling‑agency trafficking links, and possible DA leniency The passage compiles a range of specific allegations – cash payments to Palm Beach police, a $1 million wire to Jean‑Luc Brunel’s offshore account, recruitment of under‑age girls via the MC2 modeling agency, and claims that Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr. ignored housing‑guideline rules for a Level‑3 sex offender. These details provide concrete leads (names, amounts, dates, agencies) that could be followed up with FOIA requests, financial record analysis, and interviews with law‑enforcement officials. While many claims repeat publicly known narratives, the inclusion of alleged police donations, the $100 k police equipment grant, and the DA’s alleged inaction add new investigative angles, raising moderate controversy and sensitivity. Key insights: Epstein allegedly gave $100,000 to the Palm Beach Police Department for equipment, then was asked to return it.; A $1 million wire transfer to Jean‑Luc Brunel’s offshore account in September 2004 is cited as a possible back‑door investment in the MC2 modeling agency.; Staff members were reportedly instructed to keep $2,000 cash on hand for recruiting girls and paying them for massages.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein house details and alleged MC2 trafficking links

The passage repeats widely reported allegations about Epstein’s activities and mentions known associates (Jean‑Luc Brunel, Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova). It adds a claim that Epstein gave $1 mi Alleged $1 million payment from Epstein to Jean‑Luc Brunel for MC2 startup Former bookkeeper claims MC2‑linked girls were trafficked on Epstein’s private jets Four staff members (Sarah Kellen, Adrian

2p
House OversightUnknown

Epstein Palm Beach house investigation reveals staff involvement, appointment books, and alleged sale of internal notes

Epstein Palm Beach house investigation reveals staff involvement, appointment books, and alleged sale of internal notes The passage provides concrete details about Epstein's operation—staff names, alleged appointment books, and a house manager’s claim he tried to sell internal notes—for potential follow‑up. It ties a billionaire financier and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell to systematic sexual abuse, implicating the FBI and Palm Beach Police. While many elements are already public, the specific claim of a $50,000 sale of “golden nugget” notes and the list of staff members offer actionable leads, meriting a strong but not blockbuster score. Key insights: Staff members Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Marcinkova were named in the FBI investigation and allegedly managed a daily massage appointment book.; Ghislaine Maxwell is identified as a recruiter of underage girls.; House manager Alfredo Rodriguez claims he possessed notes/emails about massage appointments and attempted to sell them for $50,000.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Email chain questioning Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr.'s handling of Jeffrey Epstein's Level 3 sex offender housing

Email chain questioning Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr.'s handling of Jeffrey Epstein's Level 3 sex offender housing The passage references a potential procedural lapse by a high‑profile district attorney in allowing Epstein to reside near a school, which could merit an oversight inquiry. However, it offers no concrete evidence, dates, or documents beyond public statements, limiting its investigative immediacy. The controversy is moderate, and the claim is not novel—it repeats already‑public criticism of Vance’s decisions. Key insights: Mentions Epstein’s self‑identification as an "offender" after release from jail in 2011.; Raises question of why Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr. permitted a Level 3 sex offender to live near Central Park and a school.; Notes that Vance did not return calls from the email author seeking clarification.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.