Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-23399House OversightDeposition

Deposition excerpt suggests Jeffrey Epstein named individuals, including Alan Dershowitz, but invoked the Fifth Amendment

The passage hints that Epstein disclosed names of participants in a criminal conspiracy during civil litigation, yet refused to answer about Alan Dershowitz, implying potential criminal exposure for h Epstein allegedly named multiple people in a civil case deposition. He invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about Alan Dershowitz. Names mentioned: Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, Adrianna Muc

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #021920
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage hints that Epstein disclosed names of participants in a criminal conspiracy during civil litigation, yet refused to answer about Alan Dershowitz, implying potential criminal exposure for h Epstein allegedly named multiple people in a civil case deposition. He invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about Alan Dershowitz. Names mentioned: Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, Adrianna Muc

Tags

named-individualscivil-litigationfifth-amendmentdepositionalan-dershowitzlegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightpotential-criminal-misconductcriminal-conspiracyepstein

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 97 recollection as to something that you have not yet told me about. A. So -- and this refreshes my recollection. Sarah Kellen, I think I refer to her as Miss Kellen. Sarah Kellen was the first name. Nadia Marcinkova, Nadia was the first name there. Adrianna Mucinska was the full name of those -- that's the second echelon of the -- of the criminal conspiracy . Oh, this refreshes my recollection that Jeffrey Epstein had answered some questions in the civil litigation. He provided, for example, names of some people who were involved, but he took the Fifth when asked -- he took -- he provided names of some people who would have relevant information in the civil cases. But when asked in deposition about Mr. Dershowitz, he took the Fifth. So I found it significant that for some people, he was willing to answer questions, but with regard to Mr. Dershowitz, he took -- invoked his Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination presumably because revealing what he knew about Mr. Dershowitz would, you know, cause criminal -- criminal charges potentially to be filed against him. There was a common scheme or plan and I'11 ROUGH DRAFT ONLY

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refrefreshes

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Witnesses linked to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case invoke Fifth Amendment and were covered by unusual non‑prosecution agreements

The passage suggests a possible pattern of witnesses (including Sarah Kellen, Miss Mucinska, and Miss Marcinkova) refusing to answer questions about Alan Dershowitz and being protected by atypical non Four individuals invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about Alan Dershowitz. All three named women were reportedly covered by a “highly unusual” non‑prosecution agreement. The speaker claims t

1p
House OversightUnknown

Witnesses linked to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case invoke Fifth Amendment and were covered by unusual non‑prosecution agreements

Witnesses linked to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case invoke Fifth Amendment and were covered by unusual non‑prosecution agreements The passage suggests a possible pattern of witnesses (including Sarah Kellen, Miss Mucinska, and Miss Marcinkova) refusing to answer questions about Alan Dershowitz and being protected by atypical non‑prosecution agreements. While it hints at a broader cover‑up involving a high‑profile figure (Epstein) and a prominent attorney (Dershowitz), it lacks concrete details such as dates, transaction data, or direct evidence, limiting immediate investigative action. Key insights: Four individuals invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about Alan Dershowitz.; All three named women were reportedly covered by a “highly unusual” non‑prosecution agreement.; The speaker claims to have been a federal prosecutor and judge, implying insider knowledge.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Jeffrey Epstein communications reveal alleged police payoffs, modeling‑agency trafficking links, and possible DA leniency

Jeffrey Epstein communications reveal alleged police payoffs, modeling‑agency trafficking links, and possible DA leniency The passage compiles a range of specific allegations – cash payments to Palm Beach police, a $1 million wire to Jean‑Luc Brunel’s offshore account, recruitment of under‑age girls via the MC2 modeling agency, and claims that Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr. ignored housing‑guideline rules for a Level‑3 sex offender. These details provide concrete leads (names, amounts, dates, agencies) that could be followed up with FOIA requests, financial record analysis, and interviews with law‑enforcement officials. While many claims repeat publicly known narratives, the inclusion of alleged police donations, the $100 k police equipment grant, and the DA’s alleged inaction add new investigative angles, raising moderate controversy and sensitivity. Key insights: Epstein allegedly gave $100,000 to the Palm Beach Police Department for equipment, then was asked to return it.; A $1 million wire transfer to Jean‑Luc Brunel’s offshore account in September 2004 is cited as a possible back‑door investment in the MC2 modeling agency.; Staff members were reportedly instructed to keep $2,000 cash on hand for recruiting girls and paying them for massages.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein communications reveal possible DA leniency, police donations, and $1M transfer to modeling mogul Jean‑Luc Brunel

The document strings together several actionable leads: Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance’s alleged failure to enforce housing restrictions on a Level‑3 sex offender; documented cash gifts to the Palm Beach Po Cyrus Vance Jr. allegedly ignored housing‑guideline violations for Epstein’s Upper East Side residen Epstein gave $100,000 to the Palm Beach Police Department and received police‑department hats for

13p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

88p
House OversightUnknown

Email chain questioning Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr.'s handling of Jeffrey Epstein's Level 3 sex offender housing

Email chain questioning Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr.'s handling of Jeffrey Epstein's Level 3 sex offender housing The passage references a potential procedural lapse by a high‑profile district attorney in allowing Epstein to reside near a school, which could merit an oversight inquiry. However, it offers no concrete evidence, dates, or documents beyond public statements, limiting its investigative immediacy. The controversy is moderate, and the claim is not novel—it repeats already‑public criticism of Vance’s decisions. Key insights: Mentions Epstein’s self‑identification as an "offender" after release from jail in 2011.; Raises question of why Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr. permitted a Level 3 sex offender to live near Central Park and a school.; Notes that Vance did not return calls from the email author seeking clarification.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.