Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-25610House OversightOther

Email between Jeffrey E. and Michael Wolff discussing meeting logistics and vague reference to Clinton/Gore

The passage contains only scheduling talk and a brief, unclear comment about a sentence that may mention not meeting Clinton or Gore. No concrete allegations, transactions, dates, or actionable leads Sender worries about wording implying they never met Clinton or Gore. Email includes standard attorney‑client privilege disclaimer. No substantive content about wrongdoing, financial flows, or invest

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #031593
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains only scheduling talk and a brief, unclear comment about a sentence that may mention not meeting Clinton or Gore. No concrete allegations, transactions, dates, or actionable leads Sender worries about wording implying they never met Clinton or Gore. Email includes standard attorney‑client privilege disclaimer. No substantive content about wrongdoing, financial flows, or invest

Tags

email-correspondencepolitical-figures-mentionhouse-oversightlegal-disclaimer

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Sent: 3/29/2015 4:20:37 PM To: Michael Wolff Subject: Re: Today... Importance: High ok, i need to run by lawyers, your sentene appears to read i nevefr met clinton or gore?? harsh about women, i thought we modified that. On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Michael Wolff wrote: In NYC or otherwise? Why don't we plan on talking then at about 5:00. On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:03 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: be back on land around 4 On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Michael Wolff Tote: Have you read? When's good to talk? please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Internal memo advising on handling of alleged sex‑slave ring and VR lawsuit claims

The passage is an internal communication offering editorial guidance on a story. It mentions alleged allegations (sex‑slave ring, $50 M VR lawsuit) but provides no concrete evidence, dates, transactio Reference to a “sex slave ring” and multiple alleged victims. Alleged $50 M lawsuit by VR against the subject, claimed to be false. Guidance on how to frame denials and quotations to limit exposure.

1p
House OversightNov 16, 2015

Draft Document Titled “The Snowden Affair: A Spy Story in Six Parts”

Draft Document Titled “The Snowden Affair: A Spy Story in Six Parts” The passage only provides a title and metadata for a 287‑page draft about the Snowden affair. It contains no specific names, dates, transactions, or allegations that could be pursued as an investigative lead. Consequently, it offers no actionable information and is likely already covered in public discourse. Key insights: Document appears to be a draft manuscript by Edward Jay Epstein.; Length indicated as 287 pages, suggesting extensive coverage.; Associated with a House Oversight file identifier (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020153).

1p
House OversightUnknown

Email exchange between Michael Wolff and Jeffrey E. about scheduling a call

Email exchange between Michael Wolff and Jeffrey E. about scheduling a call The passage contains only a routine scheduling conversation with no substantive information about influential actors, financial flows, or misconduct. It offers no actionable leads for investigation. Key insights: Date: March 29, 2015; Participants: Michael Wolff and Jeffrey E.; Discussion about arranging a phone call at 5:00 PM

1p
House OversightJan 5, 2018

Document titled “INSIDE THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE” with minimal content

Document titled “INSIDE THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE” with minimal content The file contains only a title and file identifier with no substantive information, names, dates, transactions, or allegations. It provides no actionable leads or novel insights into any controversial actions or actors. Key insights: File appears to be a placeholder or index page; No mention of individuals, agencies, or financial details

1p
House OversightUnknown

Internal memo advising on handling of alleged sex‑slave ring and VR lawsuit claims

Internal memo advising on handling of alleged sex‑slave ring and VR lawsuit claims The passage is an internal communication offering editorial guidance on a story. It mentions alleged allegations (sex‑slave ring, $50 M VR lawsuit) but provides no concrete evidence, dates, transactions, or new names of powerful actors. The content is largely speculative and procedural, offering limited investigative value. Key insights: Reference to a “sex slave ring” and multiple alleged victims.; Alleged $50 M lawsuit by VR against the subject, claimed to be false.; Guidance on how to frame denials and quotations to limit exposure.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Internal email with editorial notes on a reporter's draft about alleged sex‑slave claims and financial‑hiding accusations

The passage provides only vague suggestions for how a reporter might frame or edit a story. It mentions alleged ‘sex slave ring’, wealth‑hiding, and a $50 M lawsuit, but offers no names, dates, transa Mentions a ‘sex slave ring’ and multiple alleged victims. References possible wealth‑hiding for clients. Alludes to a $50 M lawsuit by ‘VR’ (unidentified).

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.