Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-31410House OversightFinancial Record

Email chain referencing Trump budget cuts and private donor funding for scientists

The passage contains a benign exchange about scientific funding and a vague interest in the vagus nerve, with no concrete allegations, transactions, or high‑profile individuals beyond a generic refere Mentions a Huffington Post article about a private donor helping fund scientists after proposed Trum Discusses personal logistics for a meeting in New York, possibly related to vagus nerve research.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #032565
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains a benign exchange about scientific funding and a vague interest in the vagus nerve, with no concrete allegations, transactions, or high‑profile individuals beyond a generic refere Mentions a Huffington Post article about a private donor helping fund scientists after proposed Trum Discusses personal logistics for a meeting in New York, possibly related to vagus nerve research.

Tags

financial-flowprivate-donorpolicy-impactscience-fundingtrump-administrationvagus-nervehouse-oversightbudget-cuts

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Stanley Rosenberg______________________ Sent: 8/25/2017 6:56:49 AM To: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Subject: Re: I look forward to hearing from you Importance: High What nice coverage in the Huffington Post. Living in Europe, I was not aware that Trump's proposed cuts will be so devastating to the scientific community. You asked me if I would be in New York September 18. Did you have something in mind? I am 77 and do not travel so well. I have cut back on my plans to travel. I can consider coming to New York, September has anything to do specifically with the vagus nerve - and if it cannot be done with a conference call on Skype. I will be able to stop in NYC on a future trip. Linda Stone was the person who I met with years ago. It was Linda who suggested that I contact you. best wishes, Stanley From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 3:22 AM To: Stanley Rosenberg Subject: Re: I look forward to hearing from you http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/private-donor-helps-fund-scientists-after-trumps- proposed us 599f532ae4b0dOef9f1c129d Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After Trump's Proposed "Anti-Science" Budget Cuts www.huffingtonpost.com The famous American Astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson, once said, "The good thing about science is that it's true, whether or not you believe in ... On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Stanley Rosenberg wrote: Dear Jeffrey, can you please tell me about your interest in the vagus nerve? Why is the vagus nerve important to you? Perhaps you can refer me to web site where I can learn more about your take on it. best wishes, Stanley please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

URLhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/private-donor-helps-fund-scientists-after-trumps

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Informal email exchange about possible meeting and Trump science budget cuts

Informal email exchange about possible meeting and Trump science budget cuts The passage contains a casual scheduling conversation with no concrete details, transactions, or actionable leads. It only references generic concerns about proposed Trump budget cuts to science, which are already public knowledge, and mentions no high‑profile individuals beyond a vague reference to Trump. Key insights: Email chain between Jeffrey E. and Stanley Rosenberg discussing possible September meeting in New York.; Mentions concern about Trump’s proposed cuts to scientific funding.; Reference to a Huffington Post article (unspecified).

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein emails detailing involvement in Oliver Stone's 'Wall Street 2' set, including cameo by Donald Trump

The passage provides a first‑person account linking Jeffrey Epstein to high‑profile Hollywood production activities and mentions a on‑set appearance by Donald Trump. While the narrative is largely ane Epstein corresponded with publicist Peggy Siegel about film set events and social gatherings. The email describes a cameo appearance by Donald Trump on the set of 'Wall Street 2' and his interac Nume

9p
House OversightUnknown

BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Hard Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Crimes, but Flight Logs and Lawyer Claims Provide Leads

BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Hard Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Crimes, but Flight Logs and Lawyer Claims Provide Leads The passage summarizes a detailed review of over 2,000 pages of court filings that confirm Bill Clinton flew on Epstein's jet multiple times and that attorneys have attempted to use Clinton's connection in lawsuits. While it concludes there is no concrete proof of sexual misconduct, it identifies specific leads – flight logs, attorney Jack Scarola’s threats, alleged settlement negotiations involving Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr, and pending lawsuits by [REDACTED - Survivor] – that merit further investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Clinton appears on 13 flight logs for Epstein's private 727 between 2002‑2003, often with Epstein aide Sarah Kellen and Clinton aide Doug Band.; Attorney Jack Scarola warned of "extortionate threats, power, wealth or political pressure" when asked for proof linking Clinton.; [REDACTED - Survivor]' lawsuit alleges Epstein forced her sexual exploitation by "adult male peers" including high‑level figures; she claims Clinton was present on Little St. James Island but later recanted sexual claims against him.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Anecdotal Oscar Night Narrative with No Concrete Leads

The passage is a personal, unverified recollection of the 2017 Oscars with no specific names of powerful officials, financial transactions, or actionable allegations. It lacks verifiable details, date Describes a mistaken envelope incident involving Warren Beatty. Mentions publicists Kelly Bush and Lisa Taback in a casual context. References Donald J. Trump only as a vague cultural backdrop.

1p
House OversightMar 11, 2011

Hollywood Oscar Campaign Narrative by Publicist Peggy Siegal

Hollywood Oscar Campaign Narrative by Publicist Peggy Siegal The passage is a promotional, anecdotal recount of Oscar season events and film festival screenings. It mentions industry figures (Harvey Weinstein, Scott Rudin, etc.) but provides no concrete allegations, financial details, or actionable leads linking them to misconduct or illicit activity. The content is largely descriptive and lacks novel, verifiable claims that would merit investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Peggy Siegal describes her role as a publicist covering Oscar campaigns.; Mentions various high‑profile filmmakers and actors (Harvey Weinstein, Scott Rudin, Tom Hooper, Colin Firth).; Describes festival strategies and award‑season lobbying tactics.

1p
House OversightUnknown

iMessage thread hints at paid media production, high‑level political figures, and covert coordination with foreign interests

iMessage thread hints at paid media production, high‑level political figures, and covert coordination with foreign interests The conversation contains multiple actionable clues – a $100k invoice, references to a ‘cast’ for filming, mentions of Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, Michael Wolff, and Chinese market manipulation – that suggest a coordinated media or influence operation involving powerful political actors and foreign financial interests. While the specifics are vague, the repeated references to payments, legal arrangements, and government sensitivity provide concrete follow‑up leads (e.g., trace the $100k invoice, identify the production crew, locate the ‘letter to Burke’, and verify the alleged Chinese market influence). The content is moderately controversial and ties to high‑profile individuals, warranting further investigation. Key insights: Reference to sending an invoice for $100k to Darren – potential payment for services.; Discussion of assembling a ‘cast’ and filming on an island, with government interest in controlling press.; Mentions of Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, and Bannon in a context suggesting exploitation or coordinated messaging.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.