Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-37468House OversightOther

Personal assault narrative involving individuals named Richard and an unnamed male acquaintance

The passage describes alleged sexual assault and abuse by private individuals with no indication of involvement by public officials, institutions, or financial transactions. While it may be relevant t Victim recounts alleged non-consensual sexual acts by a person named Richard. Earlier incident in 2003 with an unnamed male who bit the victim's neck. Victim describes emotional and physical response

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #018451
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage describes alleged sexual assault and abuse by private individuals with no indication of involvement by public officials, institutions, or financial transactions. While it may be relevant t Victim recounts alleged non-consensual sexual acts by a person named Richard. Earlier incident in 2003 with an unnamed male who bit the victim's neck. Victim describes emotional and physical response

Tags

victim-narrativesexual-assaulthouse-oversightpersonal-testimonysexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
"How do you know?" I asked, irritated by his presumption, nervously curious. I wasn't sure I was what he thought I was -- wasn't sure what had been going on that night, beyond alcohol dulling my reactions and feelings. But I knew I hadn't been abused or violated. I hadn't asked him to stop, and I wanted to figure out why. "How did you know about me?” "I can tell," he said, and grinned. "With you, it was obvious.” He paused, added quietly, "You were begging for it.” A couple of hours later, we remained fully clothed, my face was buried in his pillow, and I was crying. He'd pinned me down so I couldn't move, and was raking his nails across what was exposed of my tank-topped back. When Richard first spotted the tears, he'd asked if I wanted a break. I'd said that it was okay, that he should continue, that I was fine. I felt myself fragmenting, desperation and terror and pain pouring through me in an unbearable, necessary torrent. I told myself over and over that it didn't hurt that much, but I couldn't stop myself from tensing, crying out. After a while, I found myself saying, "No." I felt him check himself, shifting his weight from my back. "Can we clarify something?” he asked gently. "Do you really want me to stop when you say no?” No, I realized, J don't, and something vital in my psyche seemed to snap. The tears overwhelmed me. I couldn't get an answer out through my sobs, but even if I could have, I haven't the faintest idea what I might have said. "We should take a break," he decided, and moved away. I'll never forget the relief -- and desolation -- I felt as he did. TK OK ok It was a long time later that I remembered: I had met someone like Richard, years before. It had been in spring 2003; the guy was thin and pale, dressing mainly in black. I hadn't once thought of him in a romantic light. I'd counted him a friend, but had only been alone with him once. We were in his living room, seated next to each other on dun-colored carpet. I couldn't recall how it started -- we'd been sitting playing video games? had he tickled me as I shouted invective at the screen? -- but it ended with him holding my wrists, me lying back on the floor and wondering how to get him off me. I'd thought he might kiss me, so I turned my head away. Instead, he bit my neck. "No," I said aloud, more in startlement than anything else, and he gave me a searching look -- as if he wasn't sure I was serious. "Please let me up,” I said, and he asked, "Why?" I didn't feel panicked, but strangely at a loss: he didn't seem to take my objection seriously. Yet he wasn't particularly threatening me, and I wasn't afraid. I explained that I was in a committed, monogamous relationship I didn't want to disrupt; I carefully didn't react when he bit me again, although it hurt. I didn't say I wasn't getting anything out of my powerlessness or his apparent desire to

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

President Trump discusses Bob Woodward interview on phone, claims staff ignorance

President Trump discusses Bob Woodward interview on phone, claims staff ignorance The passage provides a brief anecdote of Trump’s phone call with journalist Bob Woodward, noting a claim that White House staff failed to inform him of the interview request. While it mentions a high‑profile figure (President Trump) and a senior aide (Kellyanne Conway), it lacks concrete details about wrongdoing, financial flows, or actionable leads. The information is already publicly reported and offers little novel investigative value. Key insights: Trump claims his staff did not tell him Woodward wanted an interview.; Kellyanne Conway is referenced as having asked Trump about a call.; Trump characterizes Woodward as "always been fair" but later calls the book inaccurate.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Internal Labor Party Power Struggle Over Peres’ Role as Party President

Internal Labor Party Power Struggle Over Peres’ Role as Party President The passage describes internal dynamics within Israel's Labor Party, focusing on Shimon Peres and internal votes for a ceremonial party presidency. While it provides vivid detail of personal tensions, it lacks concrete allegations, financial flows, or links to high‑level officials beyond party figures, offering limited investigative value. Key insights: Shimon Peres considered a ceremonial party president role amid leadership transition.; Party secretary‑general Nissim Zvili proposed the motion.; Peres faced vocal opposition from delegates questioning his motives.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bill Siegel email chain discussing 'The Control Factor' and anti‑Islamic conspiracy narrative

The passage is an internal email and interview transcript promoting a conspiratorial worldview about 'Islamic Enemy' and 'Civilization Jihad.' It mentions Jeffrey Epstein as a sender but provides no c Email originates from Jeffrey Epstein's address, but only contains a casual invitation and a link to Bill Siegel outlines a theory called the 'Control Factor' that frames Islam as a coordinated threa

20p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Personal recollections of economic discussions with Nobel laureates

The passage is a memoir-style narrative about academic conversations on monetary theory and ETFs, lacking any concrete leads, names of officials, financial transactions, or allegations of misconduct. Mentions Nobel laureates Franco Modigliani and Milton Friedman discussing monetary ideas. Describes a proposal to treat ETFs and mutual funds as money-like assets. Speculates on banking structural ch

1p
House OversightUnknown

Local sports roundup with Scott Boras comments on Dodgers and Mets valuations

Local sports roundup with Scott Boras comments on Dodgers and Mets valuations The passage is a mixed local sports article with no concrete allegations, financial transaction details, or actionable leads involving powerful officials. It mentions Scott Boras' remarks on MLB team sales and a vague reference to the Mets' payment to a Madoff trustee, but provides no names, dates, or evidence of wrongdoing. The content is largely routine sports reporting, offering minimal investigative value. Key insights: Scott Boras likens Dodgers and Mets financial situations to supermarket categories.; Dodgers reportedly sold for $2 billion; Mets owners to pay up to $162 million to a Madoff trustee.; Mentions of high‑profile MLB figures (Mark Walter, Stan Kasten, Magic Johnson) in Dodgers ownership group.

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.