Case Filed-8658Court Unsealedcourt filing or legal brief: Case 2:17-cr-00354-JAK Document 1859 Filed 03/22/21 Page 10 of 20
Unknown1p
Case File
d-8658Court Unsealedcourt filing or legal brief: Case 2:17-cr-00354-JAK Document 1859 Filed 03/22/21 Page 10 of 20
Legal Filing
The document analyzes the District's Jury Plan and its territorial division, referencing United States v. Gottfried and United States v. Bahna. It discusses the rationale behind dividing jury pools territorially and the implications for fair cross-section challenges. The Second Circuit's decision in Bahna is highlighted as framing the inquiry into whether a jury venire drawn from a properly designated division satisfies fair cross-section requirements.
Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: case 2:17-cr-00354-jak document 1859 filed 03/22/21 page 10 of 20
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.