Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00021810DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00021810

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00021810
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Subject: FW: Activity in Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ USA v. Maxwell Commitment to Another District Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 13:56:26 +0000 Attachments: Maxwell_Committment.pdf From: [email protected] <ed [email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 9:47 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Activity in Case 1:20-n1j-00132-A1 USA v. Maxwell Commitment to Another District This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court District of New Hampshire Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 7/6/2020 at 9:47 AM EDT and filed on 7/2/2020 Case Name: USA v. Maxwell Case Number: 1.20-mj-00132-AJ Filer: Document Number:3 Docket Text: COMMITMENT TO ANOTHER DISTRICT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Defendant committed to District of Southern District of New York. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone. (kad) 1:20-mj-00132-AJ-1 Notice has been electronically mailed to: USANH.ECFCriminal usdoj.gov, [email protected] 1:20-mj-00132-AJ-1 Notice, to the extent appropriate, must be delivered conventionally to: The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: EFTA00021810 Document description:Main Document Original ffienamem/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dceciStamp_11: 1045603718 [Date=7/6/2020] [FileNumber=2213530-0] [a54aff0aa1928dad9fe689f4deed294c6888dabd358b213ab141d106659680925bf9 5ed9e5b779934631a8d8c2c6569de4b22ff69a0f11641e996d235302ffeb]] EFTA00021811

Technical Artifacts (8)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:20-MJ-00132-AJ
Phone2213530
Phone5603718
Wire Refreferenced

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ USA v. Maxwell Notice of Hearing

From: To: Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ USA v. Maxwell Notice of Hearing Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:11:14 +0000 Ha you have a moment for a quick call to discuss the court conference? I'm when you have a chance. Thanks! From: Sent: Thursday, July 2, 202012:14 PM To: Subject: FW: Activity in Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ USA v. Maxwell Notice of Hearing Removal hearing is scheduled for 3:30. From: ecf bounceanhd.uscourts.gov <ecf bounceOnhd.uscourts.gov> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 202012:10 PM To: nefPnhd.uscourts.gov Subject: Activity in Case 1:20-n1j-00132-A1 USA v. Maxwell Notice of Hearing This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CMIECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically,

2p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00024772

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00021837

0p
House OversightUnknown

Deep Thinking – collection of essays by AI thought leaders

Deep Thinking – collection of essays by AI thought leaders The document is a largely philosophical and historical overview of AI research, its thinkers, and societal implications. It contains no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or novel claims that point to actionable investigative leads involving influential actors. The content is primarily a synthesis of known public positions and historical anecdotes, offering limited new information for investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Highlights concerns about AI risk and alignment voiced by prominent researchers (e.g., Stuart Russell, Max Tegmark, Jaan Tallinn).; Notes the growing corporate influence on AI development (e.g., references to Google, Microsoft, Amazon, DeepMind).; Mentions historical episodes where AI research intersected with military funding and government secrecy.

1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00018663

0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01263117

7p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.