Subject: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black
From: To: Cc: Bce: Subject: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:53:07 +0000 Importance: Normal and I spoke with Roy. Roy said that he had called because he had heard that Rolando had discussed the matter with Barry Krischer and Roy wanted to see if there was any way to wrap this up before July 7th. Roy also said that he had seen a letter from Jeff Sloman that said that the matter of incarceration would be left to the State. (I am not certain what letter he is referring to, but I think Jeff wrote a letter about not taking a position on where Epstein would be incarcerated, not the length of time.) So, Roy wondered whether we would go away if Epstein took Barry's 60-day deal. e xplained that Rolando had not had substantive discussions with Barry about the case and that all communication regarding the case is being handled by and me. In response to the question of whether there was anything that could "make this go away," we say our position is that if
Summary
From: To: Cc: Bce: Subject: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:53:07 +0000 Importance: Normal and I spoke with Roy. Roy said that he had called because he had heard that Rolando had discussed the matter with Barry Krischer and Roy wanted to see if there was any way to wrap this up before July 7th. Roy also said that he had seen a letter from Jeff Sloman that said that the matter of incarceration would be left to the State. (I am not certain what letter he is referring to, but I think Jeff wrote a letter about not taking a position on where Epstein would be incarcerated, not the length of time.) So, Roy wondered whether we would go away if Epstein took Barry's 60-day deal. e xplained that Rolando had not had substantive discussions with Barry about the case and that all communication regarding the case is being handled by and me. In response to the question of whether there was anything that could "make this go away," we say our position is that if
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Fax 561 820-8777561 820-8777referringRelated Documents (6)
EFTA01659959
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 57
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-MarratIVIatthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Third Supplemental Privilege Log. The index has been marked with Bates Numbers P-014924 thru P-015267. The documents referenced in the Third Supplemental Privilege Log will be delivered tomorrow to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Villafafia A. MARIE VILLAFAFIA Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 40
EFTA Document EFTA01659959
NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct
NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferential treatment. It names high‑profile officials (Cyrus Vance Jr., Alexander Acosta, Danny Frost) and outlines specific communications, dates, and procedural steps that investigators could follow to obtain the briefs and probe possible misconduct. Key insights: NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requesting victim‑redacted copies.; Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing Civil Rights Law § 50‑b and alleged lack of notice to Florida prosecutors.; Post withdrew the motion (Jan 4, 2019) to avoid procedural disputes, then refiled after notifying Florida prosecutors (Palm Beach State Attorney and U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Florida).
Olt LexisNexis°
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.