Subject: RE: 302s! interview notes

From: To: ' Cc r Subject: RE: 302s! interview notes Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 19:08:08 +0000 Got it, thanks. From: Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 15:06 To: Cc: Subject: Re: 302s / interview notes That was a typo. It's just the two. On May 22, 2020, at 2:45 PM, >; You said three missing but listed two - is it just From: Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 08:23 To: Cc: Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes and =, or one more? > wrote: The spreadsheet is updated with everything in email. In terms of notes, the only three that are missing/not been covered are the following: For ease of reference, I've attached the corresponding 302s for each of these interviews. Apart from that, we appear to be all covered in terms of 302s/notes. From: Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 8:25 PM To: Cc: a; Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes >; Ok sorry for the delay. EFTA00074676 For there is only the attachment; no notes were taken for the 302 authored by Yes, the 302 regarding= is just the