To: "Peter Skinner"
From: To: "Peter Skinner" Subject: RE: legal process, in re v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 18:23:31 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019-02-05,_subpoena_to_Boies_Schiller,_case_15_Civ_7433_(RWS).pdf Mr. Skinner, Attached please find a grand jury subpoena directed to Boies Schiller Flexner UP, in connection with the case captioned v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS), in the Southern District of New York. I understand you are authorized to accept service on behalf of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. Please contact me if there are any questions or if additional information is required. Respectfully, Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00098731
Summary
From: To: "Peter Skinner" Subject: RE: legal process, in re v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 18:23:31 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019-02-05,_subpoena_to_Boies_Schiller,_case_15_Civ_7433_(RWS).pdf Mr. Skinner, Attached please find a grand jury subpoena directed to Boies Schiller Flexner UP, in connection with the case captioned v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS), in the Southern District of New York. I understand you are authorized to accept service on behalf of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. Please contact me if there are any questions or if additional information is required. Respectfully, Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00098731
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Fragmentary Text Mentions ‘Cacioppo’, ‘Nusbaum’, and ‘Chicago Social Brain Network’ in Unclear Context
Fragmentary Text Mentions ‘Cacioppo’, ‘Nusbaum’, and ‘Chicago Social Brain Network’ in Unclear Context The passage consists largely of incoherent fragments with no clear factual allegations, dates, transactions, or identifiable misconduct. It only loosely references a few names (Cacioppo, Nusbaum) and an organization (Chicago Social Brain Network) without any substantive connection to wrongdoing or power structures, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Mentions a possible individual named Cacioppo.; Mentions a possible individual named Nusbaum.; References the Chicago Social Brain Network and a publication titled “Invisible Forces and Powerful Beliefs”.
OLC Memo Mischaracterizes Victims' Rights Under the CVRA
OLC Memo Mischaracterizes Victims' Rights Under the CVRA The passage critiques an Office of Legal Counsel memorandum’s interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, highlighting possible over‑narrow reading of victim protections. While it points to legal arguments and cites statutes, it does not identify specific actors, financial flows, or misconduct, nor does it suggest actionable investigative steps beyond a doctrinal dispute. Key insights: OLC argues CVRA rights apply only after criminal charges are filed, contrary to case law.; The author identifies three CVRA rights that could apply pre‑charging.; Citation of statutory language and prior court decisions (e.g., United States v. Rubin).
Technical Overview of AI and Deep Learning Methods
Technical Overview of AI and Deep Learning Methods The passage is a generic description of AI concepts and historical background with no mention of specific individuals, institutions, financial transactions, or alleged misconduct. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Describes generative models for detecting spam.; Explains deep learning and reinforcement learning basics.; References Google DeepMind projects like Atari playing and AlphaZero.
Analysis of OLC Memorandum on CVRA Rights and Pre‑Charging Victim Protections
The passage critiques the Office of Legal Counsel’s interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, focusing on statutory language and procedural arguments. It does not identify specific individuals, OLC argues CVRA rights apply only after criminal charges are filed. The author counters that several CVRA rights (protection, attorney conference, dignity) can apply pr Reference to VRRA and Attorney
7322001753
DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01272870
To: Peter Skinner ■
From: To: Peter Skinner ■ Cc: Sigrid McCawley Subject: RE: legal process, regarding In re v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 23:48:31 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: unsealing_order.pdf; 2019-02- 05,_subpoena_to_Boies_Schiller,_case_15_Civ_7433_(RWS).pdf Mr. Skinner, In connection with the grand jury subpoena (the "Subpoena") directed to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP ("BSF"), in connection with the case captioned v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS), in the Southern District of New York, served on February 5, 2019, attached please find a sealed order (the "Order") granting permission to BSF to comply with the Subpoena through the production of discovery materials marked "CONFIDENTIAL" pursuant to the protective order in that case. Please note that although the Order permits the provision of a copy to BSF, it is otherwise sealed. A copy of the Subpoena is also attached for your convenience. I also note in particular that the Order applies only to the above-capt
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.