Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00143624DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Brad Edwards <

From: Brad Edwards < Subject: Re: Best Date: 9 March 2017 at 16:51:39 GMT To: • Cc: Paul Cassell Pottinger Stan < Sigrid McCawley We should after the hearing today. we will let you know for certain tomorrow. From: Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 11:23:59 AM To: Brad Edwards Cc: Paul Cassell; Pottinger Stan; Sigrid McCawley Subject: Re: Best Do we have confirmation of 15 May for trial date ? Thanks Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:33 pm, Brad Edwards < > wrote: It is not on your case but is all related to you. The hearing on your case is set for today but it likely going to be postponed for a month since two of the defendants (epstein and groff) just got lawyers and we have not located to serve her yet. I will let you know whether your hearing goes forward though. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 9, 2017, at 9:30 AM, c > wrote: Thanks PAUL Is this for my case? I recall first hearing was today ? Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00143624
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity

Summary

From: Brad Edwards < Subject: Re: Best Date: 9 March 2017 at 16:51:39 GMT To: • Cc: Paul Cassell Pottinger Stan < Sigrid McCawley We should after the hearing today. we will let you know for certain tomorrow. From: Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 11:23:59 AM To: Brad Edwards Cc: Paul Cassell; Pottinger Stan; Sigrid McCawley Subject: Re: Best Do we have confirmation of 15 May for trial date ? Thanks Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:33 pm, Brad Edwards < > wrote: It is not on your case but is all related to you. The hearing on your case is set for today but it likely going to be postponed for a month since two of the defendants (epstein and groff) just got lawyers and we have not located to serve her yet. I will let you know whether your hearing goes forward though. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 9, 2017, at 9:30 AM, c > wrote: Thanks PAUL Is this for my case? I recall first hearing was today ? Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Brad Edwards < Subject: Re: Best Date: 9 March 2017 at 16:51:39 GMT To: Cc: Paul Cassell Pottinger Stan < Sigrid McCawley We should after the hearing today. we will let you know for certain tomorrow. From: Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 11:23:59 AM To: Brad Edwards Cc: Paul Cassell; Pottinger Stan; Sigrid McCawley Subject: Re: Best Do we have confirmation of 15 May for trial date ? Thanks Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:33 pm, Brad Edwards < > wrote: It is not on your case but is all related to you. The hearing on your case is set for today but it likely going to be postponed for a month since two of the defendants (epstein and groff) just got lawyers and we have not located to serve her yet. I will let you know whether your hearing goes forward though. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 9, 2017, at 9:30 AM, c > wrote: Thanks PAUL Is this for my case? I recall first hearing was today ? Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:31 pm, Paul Cassell < > wrote: Stan and I are here in New York — and Stan has a big box of briefs ready to hand up to the judge! Paul Paul G. CassellRonald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law EFTA00143624 and University Distinguished Professor of LawS.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah , Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 (phone) (fax) You can access my publications on http://ssrn.com/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. From: [mailto: March 9, 2017 4:08 AMTo: Pottinger Stan Paul Cassell < Sent: Thursday, >; Brad Edwards >; Sigrid McCawley <I >Subject: Best All Thinking of you all today ! Good luck and please keep me informed Best Sent from ProtonMail Mobile EFTA00143625

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

URLhttp://ssrn.com/author=30160

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

List of Pro Hac Vice Counsel for House Oversight Case

The document merely provides names and contact information for attorneys appearing pro hac vice in a House oversight matter. It contains no substantive allegations, transactions, dates, or connections Identifies several high‑profile lawyers (e.g., David Boies, Boies Schiller & Flexner) representing a Specifies pro hac vice status, indicating they are admitted for a specific case in a federal or st

1p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 92 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 22

22p
House OversightUnknown

Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated

Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it names well‑known legal figures, it provides no concrete financial transactions, dates, or new factual revelations beyond already public claims, limiting its investigative utility. However, the suggestion that a court record may be sealed to hide potentially damaging testimony offers a moderate lead for further document‑review and freedom‑of‑information requests. Key insights: Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential.; He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaign.; Dershowitz threatens perjury prosecution against accusers and seeks disbarment of opposing counsel.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated

The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential. He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaig Dershow

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM

26p
House OversightUnknown

Sealed Declaration in Giuffre v. Epstein Motion to Compel Production of Epstein’s Phone Records, Contact List, and Message Pads

Sealed Declaration in Giuffre v. Epstein Motion to Compel Production of Epstein’s Phone Records, Contact List, and Message Pads The filing reveals a court‑ordered request for Epstein’s sealed phone records, contact list, and message pad excerpts, which could contain undisclosed connections to powerful individuals. While the case is already public, the specific documents sought are not, offering a concrete investigative avenue. The lead is moderately controversial and potentially high‑impact if the records expose further elite networks, but it does not yet name top‑level officials directly. Key insights: Plaintiff [REDACTED - Survivor] seeks a court order compelling Jeffrey Epstein to produce phone records, a contact list, and message pad excerpts.; The documents are filed as sealed exhibits, indicating they may contain undisclosed information.; Exhibit 4 references Ghislaine (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), suggesting her involvement in the communications.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.