Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00177620DOJ Data Set 9Other

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice FILE COPY United Slates Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 14/ 111 0 LC; 2,4ni Podhurst Orseck, P.A. City National. Bank Building 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 September 3, 2008 Re: Representations of Victims of Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Josefsberg: To assist you in your position as attorney representative for the victims of Jeffrey Epstein's federal offenses, I have enclosed the following: I . the list of victims provided to Mr. Epstein's attorney, 10, 2008; On July 2. a copy of a letter received from Mr. Epstein's attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, on September 2, 2008, confirming Mr. Epstein's agreement to pay your fees in connection with the representation of the identified victims; 3. a confidential victim notification log containing contact information for those victims and information on when and how they have been contacted;' 4. copies of victim notifications sent to some vi

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00177620
Pages
2
Persons
4
Integrity

Summary

U.S. Department of Justice FILE COPY United Slates Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 14/ 111 0 LC; 2,4ni Podhurst Orseck, P.A. City National. Bank Building 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 September 3, 2008 Re: Representations of Victims of Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Josefsberg: To assist you in your position as attorney representative for the victims of Jeffrey Epstein's federal offenses, I have enclosed the following: I . the list of victims provided to Mr. Epstein's attorney, 10, 2008; On July 2. a copy of a letter received from Mr. Epstein's attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, on September 2, 2008, confirming Mr. Epstein's agreement to pay your fees in connection with the representation of the identified victims; 3. a confidential victim notification log containing contact information for those victims and information on when and how they have been contacted;' 4. copies of victim notifications sent to some vi

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
U.S. Department of Justice FILE COPY United Slates Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 14/ 111 0 LC; 2,4ni Podhurst Orseck, P.A. City National. Bank Building 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 September 3, 2008 Re: Representations of Victims of Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Josefsberg: To assist you in your position as attorney representative for the victims of Jeffrey Epstein's federal offenses, I have enclosed the following: I . the list of victims provided to Mr. Epstein's attorney, 10, 2008; On July 2. a copy of a letter received from Mr. Epstein's attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, on September 2, 2008, confirming Mr. Epstein's agreement to pay your fees in connection with the representation of the identified victims; 3. a confidential victim notification log containing contact information for those victims and information on when and how they have been contacted;' 4. copies of victim notifications sent to some victims in July 2008; 'Please note that three victims have moved recently. As soon as we have correct contact information, that will be provided to you. EFTA00177620 SEPTEMBER 3, 2008 PAGE 2 5. copies of amended victim notifications mailed on September 2 and 3, 2008;3 6. a copy of the letter provided to Judge Davis to assist in the selection of the attorney representative (I believe that you already have a copy of this); and 7. a proposed protocol for how to proceed once the attorney representative was selected.3 I also have enclosed a copy of Judge Marra's Order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, which is referenced in the amended victim notifications. In short, to avoid needless and repetitive litigation, Judge Marra has provided a procedure for all identified victims to gain access to the entire agreement between Mr. Epstein and the United States, so long as the victims (and their attorneys) agree to be bound by the Court's Protective Order. I believe that you already have a copy of the complete agreement, but, if not, please execute the Protective Order and return it to me. I would also ask that, prior to showing the Agreement to others, including your co-counsel and the victims, you have each of them review and execute the Protective Order. Please return those signed Protective Orders to me for my file. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. I also would appreciate it if you would send me your e-mail address so that I can send the updated victim log to you via e-mail. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta B Enclosures United States Attorne sststant unttea states Attorney 'Please note that, althouar is carbon copied on all of the victim notification letters, I redacted the addresses and contact information for the un-represented victims to reinforce the understanding that Mr. Epstein's counsel can only contact the victims via their counsel. 'Please note that Mr. Epstein's counsel objected to this protocol when it was provided to them in October 2007. EFTA00177621

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreferenced

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

88p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, makes its Initial Disclosures, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A), and state: Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A)fil: 1. R. Alexander Acosta Dean, School of Law Florida International University Rafael Diaz-Balart Hall 11200 S.W. 8'h Street Miami, Florida 33199 (305) 348-1118 Dean Acosta was the United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened in the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the non-prosecution agreement was negotiated. 2. was the First Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney's Office, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened, and the non-prosecution agreement was negot

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70 EXHIBIT A PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS EFTA00208682 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 2 of 70 PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS Key to Objections (linking to Victims' Motion to Compel Production of Docments that Are Not Prig ileged Objection General Objections -- Inadequate Privilege Log Failure to Prove Factual Underpinnings of Privilege Claim Waiver of Confidentiality Government's Fiduciary Duty to Crime Victims Bars Privilege Communications Facilitating Crime-Fraud-Misconduct Not Covered Factual Materials Not Covered Documents Not Prepared in Anticipation of CVRA Litigation Attorney Client Objections - Ordinary Governmental Communications Not Covered Attorney-Client Relationship Not Established Deliberative Process Objections - Privilege Not Properly Invoked Final Decision Exempted from Privilege Qualified Privilege Ove

70p
OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 329 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2015 Page 1 of 2

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01325031

20p
House OversightUnknown

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged DOJ misconduct—including unauthorized subpoenas, misrepresentations to the court, undisclosed financial incentives to witnesses, ex‑parte communications, and leaks to the press—while naming senior DOJ officials (Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Marie Villafana and Jeffrey Sloman) and linking the case to former President Bill Clinton’s notoriety. These allegations, if substantiated, could expose abuse of prosecutorial discretion, potential violations of DOJ ethics rules, and political influence, making it a strong investigative lead. However, much of the material is defensive in nature and repeats known procedural complaints, limiting its novelty and concrete evidentiary hooks. Key insights: Alleged illegal re‑issuance of a grand‑jury subpoena after a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was signed (July 1 2008 subpoena).; Claims that AUSA Villafana disclosed confidential case details to the New York Times and leaked information to reporter Landon Thomas.; Accusations that Villafana attempted to appoint a personal friend of her live‑in boyfriend as attorney‑representative for victims, suggesting a conflict of interest.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.