From: '
From: ' To:' Subject: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM Doe No. 3 1 Epstein Motion for Summary Judgment Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 21:04:38 +0000 Importance: Normal This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Pike, Michael on 5/6/2010 at 5:04 PM EDT and
Summary
From: ' To:' Subject: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM Doe No. 3 1 Epstein Motion for Summary Judgment Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 21:04:38 +0000 Importance: Normal This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Pike, Michael on 5/6/2010 at 5:04 PM EDT and
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (4)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:08-CV-80232-KAM56292157550837referencedRelated Documents (6)
Subject: Jeffrey Epstein
Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:28:18 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Letter to A. This attachment has been sent to you on behalf of Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire. Regards, Legal Assistant Atterbuty, Goldbe er & Weiss, P.A. EFTA00215569
Allegations of Prosecutorial Interference in Jeffrey Epstein Child Abuse Investigation
The passage suggests possible undue influence on a state attorney's office by high‑profile lawyers (e.g., Dershowitz, Goldberger) to down‑grade Epstein's alleged crimes to a misdemeanor. It names spec Detective James Patterson recounts a shift in case handling after Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers, possibl A suggestion was made to issue a misdemeanor notice to Epstein rather than pursue felony charges.
EFTA01682184
CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP
CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRAMOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. / PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVING VERIFIED ANSWERS TO SECOND INTERROGATORIES COMES NOW the Plaintiff, , by and through the undersigned counsel, and hereby gives notice that that Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories propounded by the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, on August 28, 2009, have been furnished to the attorney for the Defendant. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by e-mail this trday of November, 2009 to alt counsel ob the attached service list. Attorney tor minim 3505-038 Page I of 5 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00005262 EFTA00157825 CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP VS. EPSTEIN, et al Case No.: 08-CV-80811-Marra/Johnson Plaintiffs Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories SERVICE LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldb
Parents sue Jeffrey Epstein for $50M over alleged sexual assault of 14‑year‑old
Parents sue Jeffrey Epstein for $50M over alleged sexual assault of 14‑year‑old The passage confirms an existing civil suit against Epstein and adds a minor new angle – the claim that the victim’s parents have prior financial‑crime arrests, which the defense is using to argue the lawsuit is financially motivated. While it provides concrete names, dates, and a filing amount, the core allegation is already public and offers limited actionable leads beyond standard follow‑up on court filings. Key insights: Civil suit filed by attorney Jeffrey Herman on behalf of a 14‑year‑old victim (Jane Doe) seeking >$50 million.; Alleged assault occurred in 2005 at Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion.; Epstein scheduled to enter a plea on a prostitution solicitation charge on March 10.
EFTA01387839
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.