XX. THE COURT CANNOT AND SHOULD NOT ACCEPT AS TRUE PETITIONERS'

XX. THE COURT CANNOT AND SHOULD NOT ACCEPT AS TRUE PETITIONERS' STATEMENTS OF FACT. In DE 49, Petitioners ask the Court to accept as true their proposed "statements of fact" because they claim that the United States has failed "to advise the victims of what facts they are contesting." Petitioners then spend several pages reciting from letters and email correspondence between the parties in an attempt to persuade the Court to adopt as true the Petitioners' averments of fact even when the falsity of some of those facts is apparent from the text itself. Contrary to their assertions, the Petitioners have not been attempting to negotiate with the government for more than 30 months. Until the Court issued its administrative order closing the case, there had been no contact regarding the CVRA petition in years . A flurry of activity ensued. Efforts were made to resolve the matter amicably, without success, including allowing the Petitioners, that is Jane Does I and 2, and their coun