Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00211808DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject:

From: To: Subject: :ReplyBrief in Jane oes United States Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:13:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 5:11 PM To: .(USAFLS) Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States From: ' (USAFLS)" Sent: 10/16/2008 05:08 PM AST To: Subject: RE: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Sent: Thursda October 16, 2008 5:01 PM To: Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does United States Thanks - welcome to the club. I often wish plaintiffs would sue someone else instead of my client. :) EFTA00211808 SAFLS)" I I Subject: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States Dear I am attaching the reply brief filed by Brad Edwards with two pieces of correspondence that he attached to his pleading as exhibits. I had not seen Mr. Edwards' October 15th letter

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00211808
Pages
3
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

From: To: Subject: :ReplyBrief in Jane oes United States Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:13:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 5:11 PM To: .(USAFLS) Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States From: ' (USAFLS)" Sent: 10/16/2008 05:08 PM AST To: Subject: RE: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Sent: Thursda October 16, 2008 5:01 PM To: Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does United States Thanks - welcome to the club. I often wish plaintiffs would sue someone else instead of my client. :) EFTA00211808 SAFLS)" I I Subject: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States Dear I am attaching the reply brief filed by Brad Edwards with two pieces of correspondence that he attached to his pleading as exhibits. I had not seen Mr. Edwards' October 15th letter

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Subject: :ReplyBrief in Jane oes United States Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:13:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 5:11 PM To: .(USAFLS) Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States From: ' (USAFLS)" Sent: 10/16/2008 05:08 PM AST To: Subject: RE: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Sent: Thursda October 16, 2008 5:01 PM To: Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does United States Thanks - welcome to the club. I often wish plaintiffs would sue someone else instead of my client. :) EFTA00211808 SAFLS)" I I Subject: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States Dear I am attaching the reply brief filed by Brad Edwards with two pieces of correspondence that he attached to his pleading as exhibits. I had not seen Mr. Edwards' October 15th letter before he filed it in connection with his Reply, so I do not know whether has even received it yet. Mr. Edwards argues that Mr. Epstein has no interest in keeping the agreement confidential because he has not responded to Mr. Edwards' motion to unseal. As you know, in our Response, the United States argued that this issue should be litigated in one of the suits filed by Mr. Edwards against Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards apparently believes it is to his benefit to argue these issues, instead, in his lawsuit against the United States. «DE30_081016_RepIy re Moth Unseal.pdf>> <<DE30-2_081016_Ex 1.pdf>> <<DE30-3_081016_Ex 2.pdf>> Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00211809 destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA00211810

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 217 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2010 Page 1 of 7

7p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM

66p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subjec

Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message

2p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02726140

4p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.