To: "Brad Edwards" <
From: To: "Brad Edwards" < Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:25:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Brad — On page 2, I would probably say, "The parties have been in contact and are actively working to determine whether the case can be resolved without additional litigation. To that end, the U.S. Attorney's Office has asked the victims to delay filing their pleading for a period of up to thirty days to permit further discussions about the facts and about possible resolution of the dispute. In view of these discussions, the parties have agreed that the period of delay from October 27, 2010 through the filing of the victims' pleading has not prejudiced either party." And then you have to remove the last sentence of the first paragraph on page 5. I have to run to a quick meeting. If you need me, call my cell or text me. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00212244
Summary
From: To: "Brad Edwards" < Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:25:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Brad — On page 2, I would probably say, "The parties have been in contact and are actively working to determine whether the case can be resolved without additional litigation. To that end, the U.S. Attorney's Office has asked the victims to delay filing their pleading for a period of up to thirty days to permit further discussions about the facts and about possible resolution of the dispute. In view of these discussions, the parties have agreed that the period of delay from October 27, 2010 through the filing of the victims' pleading has not prejudiced either party." And then you have to remove the last sentence of the first paragraph on page 5. I have to run to a quick meeting. If you need me, call my cell or text me. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00212244
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM
Case 09-34791-RBR
Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed
Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed The passage cites a specific non‑prosecution agreement that allegedly prevented a 53‑count federal indictment of Jeffrey Epstein and describes victim‑exclusion tactics. It names dates, a federal prosecutor’s draft indictment, and references to legal filings, offering concrete leads for further FOIA or court‑record requests. While the claim is not novel—Epstein’s NPA has been reported—it provides actionable details (Feb 10 2016 filing, Sept 2007 signing, June 30 2008 termination) that could be pursued to verify the agreement’s terms, the officials who negotiated it, and any potential misconduct by DOJ or the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Key insights: A 53‑count indictment prepared by federal prosecutors was never filed due to an NPA.; Victims were allegedly not consulted about the NPA, violating victim‑rights statutes.; The NPA was signed in September 2007 and remained in effect until June 30, 2008.
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it names well‑known legal figures, it provides no concrete financial transactions, dates, or new factual revelations beyond already public claims, limiting its investigative utility. However, the suggestion that a court record may be sealed to hide potentially damaging testimony offers a moderate lead for further document‑review and freedom‑of‑information requests. Key insights: Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential.; He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaign.; Dershowitz threatens perjury prosecution against accusers and seeks disbarment of opposing counsel.
The Palm Beach Post
EFTA01838551
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.