Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00212719DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Brad Edwards

From: Brad Edwards To: Subject: Re: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80736-ICAM Doe v. United States ofAmerica Status Report Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:40:04 +0000 Importance: Normal No Sent via BlacicBerry by AT&T From: > Date: n, ec -0500 To: Brad Edwards Subject: FW: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Doe v. United States of America Status Report Hi Brad — Just noticed the service list below. Is Jay Howell still representing the Petitioners? Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 10:22 AM To Subject: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Doe v. United States of America Status Report This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CIVUECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants)

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00212719
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

From: Brad Edwards To: Subject: Re: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80736-ICAM Doe v. United States ofAmerica Status Report Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:40:04 +0000 Importance: Normal No Sent via BlacicBerry by AT&T From: > Date: n, ec -0500 To: Brad Edwards Subject: FW: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Doe v. United States of America Status Report Hi Brad — Just noticed the service list below. Is Jay Howell still representing the Petitioners? Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 10:22 AM To Subject: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Doe v. United States of America Status Report This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CIVUECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants)

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Brad Edwards To: Subject: Re: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80736-ICAM Doe v. United States ofAmerica Status Report Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:40:04 +0000 Importance: Normal No Sent via BlacicBerry by AT&T From: > Date: n, ec -0500 To: Brad Edwards Subject: FW: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Doe v. United States of America Status Report Hi Brad — Just noticed the service list below. Is Jay Howell still representing the Petitioners? Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 10:22 AM To Subject: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Doe v. United States of America Status Report This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CIVUECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by 12/17/2010 Case Name: Doe v. United States of America Case Number: 9:08-cv-80736-ICAM Filer: United States of America on 12/17/2010 at 10:22 AM EST and filed on EFTA00212719 Document Number:45 Docket Text: STATUS REPORT by United States of America 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Notice has been electronically mailed to: Bradley James Edwards Jay C. Howell Paul G. Cassell 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Notice has not been delivered electronically to those listed below and will be provided by other means. For further assistance, please contact our Help Desk at 1-888-318-2260.: The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: Document description:Main Document Original filenamem/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_11: 1105629215 [Date=12/17/2010] [FileNumber=8308257- 0] [127011db5e3dba6abb804a135dfl 7baa412cb981751339e99253235f73f65d07 I bc 9a16da3e3c50f8dbf620e78de86c9c9fcba46195374cb695b02cff8452a6e3]] EFTA00212720

Technical Artifacts (6)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-ICAM
Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM
Phone1-888-318-2260
Phone5629215
Phone8308257
Wire Refreferenced

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM

26p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 09-34791-RBR

8p
House OversightUnknown

Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed

Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed The passage cites a specific non‑prosecution agreement that allegedly prevented a 53‑count federal indictment of Jeffrey Epstein and describes victim‑exclusion tactics. It names dates, a federal prosecutor’s draft indictment, and references to legal filings, offering concrete leads for further FOIA or court‑record requests. While the claim is not novel—Epstein’s NPA has been reported—it provides actionable details (Feb 10 2016 filing, Sept 2007 signing, June 30 2008 termination) that could be pursued to verify the agreement’s terms, the officials who negotiated it, and any potential misconduct by DOJ or the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Key insights: A 53‑count indictment prepared by federal prosecutors was never filed due to an NPA.; Victims were allegedly not consulted about the NPA, violating victim‑rights statutes.; The NPA was signed in September 2007 and remained in effect until June 30, 2008.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated

Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it names well‑known legal figures, it provides no concrete financial transactions, dates, or new factual revelations beyond already public claims, limiting its investigative utility. However, the suggestion that a court record may be sealed to hide potentially damaging testimony offers a moderate lead for further document‑review and freedom‑of‑information requests. Key insights: Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential.; He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaign.; Dershowitz threatens perjury prosecution against accusers and seeks disbarment of opposing counsel.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

The Palm Beach Post

2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01838551

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.