U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Facsimile: February... DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Michael E. Dutko, Esq. Bo enschutz & Dutko Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-2802 Re Dear Mr. Dutko: I am writing to clarify the ground rules for the interview with your client, ("your client" , to occur February , 2007. Ms. is not a target of this investigation, but instead is being interviewed as a victim/witness. However, to address any concern about criminal exposure, if your client complies with every provision of this agreement, then the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("this Office") will treat all statements made by your client during the interview as statements made pursuant to Rule 11(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This is not a grant of immunity, which can be given only with approval of the Justice Department, but protects your client from having the statements
Summary
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Facsimile: February... DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Michael E. Dutko, Esq. Bo enschutz & Dutko Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-2802 Re Dear Mr. Dutko: I am writing to clarify the ground rules for the interview with your client, ("your client" , to occur February , 2007. Ms. is not a target of this investigation, but instead is being interviewed as a victim/witness. However, to address any concern about criminal exposure, if your client complies with every provision of this agreement, then the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("this Office") will treat all statements made by your client during the interview as statements made pursuant to Rule 11(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This is not a grant of immunity, which can be given only with approval of the Justice Department, but protects your client from having the statements
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
301-2802Related Documents (6)
Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict
Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict The passage provides concrete names (Jeffrey Sloman, Acosta, Lefkowitz, Starr) and dates (2008, 2013) showing possible obstruction of victim notifications in the Epstein case, suggesting a lead for investigating DOJ and FBI decision‑making. While it ties high‑level officials, the claim of pressure from Epstein’s attorneys is not yet corroborated, limiting the score to the high‑mid range. Key insights: Jeffrey Sloman, top aide to U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, planned to notify Epstein victims after a plea deal was signed.; Lefkowitz warned Acosta that the office had promised not to contact victims or potential claimants.; Federal prosecutors resumed the FBI investigation and interviewed witnesses in NY and NM while plea negotiations continued.
IN RE:
IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Non-Prosecution Agreement IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein with one count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.07; IT APPEARING that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure expressed in this Agreement; IT APPEARING that the United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have conducted their own investigation of Epstein's background and offenses including; knowingly and willfully conspiring with others known and unknown to commit an offense against the United States, in violation of Titl
United States District Court
United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TO: Custodian of Records JEGE, Inc. SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY FGJ 07-103(WPB)-Tues./No. OLY-47 SUBPOENA FOR: ri PERSON DOCUMENTS OR OBJECTISI YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear and testify before the Grand Jury of the United States District Court at the place, date and time specified below. PLACE: United States District Courthouse 701 Clematis Street West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 ROOM: Grand Jury Room DATE AND TIME: May 8, 2007 1:00 pm* YOU ARE ALSO COMMANDED to bring with you the following document(s) or object(s): All income tax returns, balance sheets, regulatory filings, minutes of board of directors meetings, and documents required by or filed with the Internal Revenue Service and/or the State of Delaware referring or relating to the period of 1/1/2003 to 12/31/2005. For the period 1/1/2003 to the present, the names of all employees, copies of all W-2s for all employees, and the names
Civil lawsuit alleges Epstein‑Maxwell sex‑trafficking scheme tied to federal plea negotiations and possible high‑level cover‑up
Civil lawsuit alleges Epstein‑Maxwell sex‑trafficking scheme tied to federal plea negotiations and possible high‑level cover‑up The passage provides concrete allegations from a civil complaint (named plaintiff Ransome) that Jeffrey Epstein recruited a young masseuse with promises of fashion‑design work, kept her passport, and forced sex with powerful figures. It links the timeline to a non‑prosecution agreement negotiated by federal prosecutors (including an unnamed Acosta) and notes that the deal quashed an FBI investigation. The mention of Prince Andrew, [REDACTED - Survivor], and potential involvement of senior DOJ officials gives actionable leads (names, dates, alleged transactions) that merit follow‑up, though the claims are unverified and rely on a single civil filing. Key insights: Ransome’s civil complaint (filed Jan 2017) alleges Epstein promised career help in exchange for sex and kept her passport.; Complaint ties alleged abuse to the period when Epstein’s lawyers were negotiating a non‑prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors (Acosta et al.).; The plea deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges, receive a private‑wing jail sentence, and allegedly halted an FBI probe into an international trafficking network.
Prosecutors allegedly colluded with Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers to downplay federal charges and secure a lenient plea
The passage alleges that senior U.S. attorneys and a federal prosecutor (Andrew Acosta, Paul Villafafia) worked with Epstein’s legal team to limit federal prosecution, manipulate venue, and keep victi Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie attempted to strike references to a defendant’s prior sexual c U.S. Attorney Paul Villafafia negotiated with Epstein’s lawyers while an FBI investigation was act
Document references alleged Epstein non‑prosecution deal, FBI evidence, and pressure on U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Acosta during his 2017 labor‑secreta...
The passage links high‑level officials (Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Acosta, FBI, and the Trump administration) to a possible non‑prosecution agreement and alleged interference in a Mentions a non‑prosecution deal for Jeffrey Epstein referenced in an FLBI FOIA release. Claims FBI had sufficient evidence to prosecute but was allegedly overruled by political pressure. Alleges U.S.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.