Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00235311DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-4

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 1 of 3 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 888 Filed 08/13110 Page 1 of 3 ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on Raymond B. Ray, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION vorw.ftsb.uscotuts.itov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, PA, • CHAPTER 11 Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR ORDER RESPECTING PRODUCTION OF MailiginaMaiifithggiThargniti THIS CAUSE came before the Coun for healing on August 4, 2010 upon (i) Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Trustee Pursuant to Document Production Protocol, as established by D.E. #672 (D.B. #807); (ii) Motion for Protective Order filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lefunzan, P.L. ("Painter, Jaffe") (D.E. #81 8) and its related amendment (D.E. #819). The Court heard argument of all counsel present at the hearing, and being otherwise duly a

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00235311
Pages
3
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 1 of 3 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 888 Filed 08/13110 Page 1 of 3 ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on Raymond B. Ray, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION vorw.ftsb.uscotuts.itov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, PA, • CHAPTER 11 Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR ORDER RESPECTING PRODUCTION OF MailiginaMaiifithggiThargniti THIS CAUSE came before the Coun for healing on August 4, 2010 upon (i) Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Trustee Pursuant to Document Production Protocol, as established by D.E. #672 (D.B. #807); (ii) Motion for Protective Order filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lefunzan, P.L. ("Painter, Jaffe") (D.E. #81 8) and its related amendment (D.E. #819). The Court heard argument of all counsel present at the hearing, and being otherwise duly a

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 1 of 3 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 888 Filed 08/13110 Page 1 of 3 ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on Raymond B. Ray, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION vorw.ftsb.uscotuts.itov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, PA, • CHAPTER 11 Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR ORDER RESPECTING PRODUCTION OF MailiginaMaiifithggiThargniti THIS CAUSE came before the Coun for healing on August 4, 2010 upon (i) Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Trustee Pursuant to Document Production Protocol, as established by D.E. #672 (D.B. #807); (ii) Motion for Protective Order filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lefunzan, P.L. ("Painter, Jaffe") (D.E. #81 8) and its related amendment (D.E. #819). The Court heard argument of all counsel present at the hearing, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, EFTA00235311 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 2 of 3 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 888 Filed 08/13/10 Page 2 of 3 DOES HEREBY ORDER: f. The Court appoints former Broward County Circuit Judge Robert Carney as Special Master who shall work with counsel for the Trustee to obtain documents responsive to the subpoena served upon the Trustee by Jeffrey Epstein to: (i) review all electronically stored information ("ESI") and other documents in the Trustee's possession, including Qtask data for purposes of determining the applicability of the attorney/client and work product privileges that may inure to the benefit of L.M., Brad Edwards, and other current or former clients of Fanner, Jaffe; (ii) segregate any such privileged documents; and (iii) prepare a privilege log in accordance with standard practice and law. 2. Prior to engaging in this document review, the Special Master shall meet with counsel for Epstein, counsel for Fanner, Jaffe and counsel for the Trustee to hear their respective positions concerning these matters. Upon completion of the review by the Special Master, the Special Muster shall prepare and file a privilege log with the Court. No documents or ESI shall be released to anyone until such time as the Special Master has notified the Court that he has concluded his review of the responsive documents and is in a position to report to the Court Ins findings and to obtain further instruction. Upon the filing of such notice by the Special Master, the Court shall set a continued hearing on the pending motions identified above. All legal fees and costs incurred by the Special Master shall be paid by Epstein, who has agreed to pay directly all such fees and costs. ## 2 EFTA00235312 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 3 of 3 Case 09.34791-RBR Doe 888 Filed 08/13/10 Page 3 of 3 Submitted by-, Charles H. Lichtman, Esq. Cony abolished to• Charles H. Lichtman, Esq. (Chat IL Lichonan is directed to serve this Order to all panics of interest and to file a Certificate of Service.) 3 EFTA00235313

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80893-KAM
SWIFT/BICDISTRICT
SWIFT/BICSOUTHERN

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 09-34791-RBR

8p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

The Palm Beach Post

2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01838551

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM

26p
House OversightUnknown

Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed

Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed The passage cites a specific non‑prosecution agreement that allegedly prevented a 53‑count federal indictment of Jeffrey Epstein and describes victim‑exclusion tactics. It names dates, a federal prosecutor’s draft indictment, and references to legal filings, offering concrete leads for further FOIA or court‑record requests. While the claim is not novel—Epstein’s NPA has been reported—it provides actionable details (Feb 10 2016 filing, Sept 2007 signing, June 30 2008 termination) that could be pursued to verify the agreement’s terms, the officials who negotiated it, and any potential misconduct by DOJ or the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Key insights: A 53‑count indictment prepared by federal prosecutors was never filed due to an NPA.; Victims were allegedly not consulted about the NPA, violating victim‑rights statutes.; The NPA was signed in September 2007 and remained in effect until June 30, 2008.

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01297934

"Darren Indyke" AND allegation OR arrest OR bribe OR convict OR corrupt OR court O... Page 1 of 2 Goggle *Clew IndyMC AND elligetton OR east OR bribe OR convict CR corrupt OR O All News 'arcs I,na9pn Maps Mtn - con /}n' ,y-. 12 resettle :0 2 roorde; Exclusive: New York attorney general seeks information on financier ... vAwr refort.CCWAIrtele2CISC0MtnagnIcinl.:^areynUSKBN0M2D0V2C15DXS Mos . North Korea Cnannes &Kew ror.ed Epstein's Lawyer Darren Indyke to cup*n why Easter(' foun

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.