Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-010978House Oversight

Economic Theory Discussion Lacks Investigative Leads

Economic Theory Discussion Lacks Investigative Leads The document is a scholarly commentary on macro‑micro convergence and historical economic debates. It contains no references to individuals, institutions, transactions, or actions that could be investigated, making it noise for investigative purposes. Key insights: Focuses on convergence axioms and marginalist history.; Mentions economists (Jevons, Menger, Veblen, Schmoller) but no current actors.; No financial flows, legal matters, or political connections discussed.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-010978
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Economic Theory Discussion Lacks Investigative Leads The document is a scholarly commentary on macro‑micro convergence and historical economic debates. It contains no references to individuals, institutions, transactions, or actions that could be investigated, making it noise for investigative purposes. Key insights: Focuses on convergence axioms and marginalist history.; Mentions economists (Jevons, Menger, Veblen, Schmoller) but no current actors.; No financial flows, legal matters, or political connections discussed.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversighteconomicstheoryhistory-of-economic-thought

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
macroeconomics (“macro”) rests on micro, the convergence axioms say only what economics has accepted implicitly since micro began. The “law of one price”, meaning market equilibrium, actually begins a century and a half earlier with Cantillon. But Jevons, in co-founding the marginalist revolution in 1871, effectively made it an axiom. I don’t want to seem to claim that the convergence axioms are safe because they are accepted. Arguments ad majoritatem or ad auctoritatem prove nothing. But markets do seem to form and hold, and the convergences seem implied. Authority and majority are sometimes right. Not all economists have agreed. There have been “historicists” and “institutionalists” who mistrust the idea of convergent tastes, and prefer to see idiosyncratic national tradition or power groups or mindsets as the prime movers in place of uniform human nature. Heinrich Schmoller, a historicist who stressed national differences, tangled with Carl Menger, an independent co-founder of the marginalist revolution in 1871, in a childish feud for which Menger was at least as much to blame. If you must answer your critics, be gracious. Thorstein Veblen, an institutionalist from Wisconsin, coined the term “neoclassicism” for what we now call marginalism. He made fun of it for missing the role of institutions in driving economies for institutional or collective goals rather than individual human ones. ] think there’s something there. My main theme in this book is growth theory at the collective scale. I argue that collective growth flourishes where laws and practices and cultures nurture and protect it. These are national institutions. New ideas, by definition, are opposite from the fungible commodities for which supply and demand meet at price equilibria. Somehow they come. Dogs bark, cats climb, people innovate. I’m with Menger and Jevons and the marginalists and human nature, but with asterisks there too. There is plenty left for historicists and institutionalists to help explain. Chapter 3: Foundations 1/11/16 7

Related Documents (6)

House OversightJul 1, 2018

Satirical claims linking CIA, Tavistock, LaRouche, and Trump in a convoluted conspiracy narrative

Satirical claims linking CIA, Tavistock, LaRouche, and Trump in a convoluted conspiracy narrative The passage is a mixture of satire, unverified anecdotes, and speculative conspiracy assertions without concrete names, dates, transactions, or verifiable evidence. It mentions high‑profile figures (CIA, Lyndon LaRouche, Donald Trump, Queen Elizabeth) but provides no actionable leads, specific financial flows, or documented wrongdoing, limiting its investigative usefulness. Key insights: Alleged CIA brain‑washing program in Stockholm involving electric shocks and cyanide pills.; Claims that the Tavistock Institute recruited Paul Krassner for propaganda purposes.; Reference to a 1981 alleged Playboy‑linked assassination plot against Reagan and Bush, cited by a dubious 'New Solidarity International Press Service'.

1p
Dept. of JusticeFinancial RecordUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01268970

1First Bank Customer Due D...gence for Business - Entities ExtednerAtiiialiS-- I $7;41=-6-- Business or Entity name: Thomas 'Maid Air, LLC DEA Name (lt applicable) Physical Add .: 8203 Lindberg Be, SUMO 33 Si. Thomas, VI 170802 Business Phone: 340-775.2525 2. BusinessrEnto Desert Tyro ol Buelnees. Date F_stablishedr. Type of Entity • or Social Security /amber Social Security Number (If applicable): ramp Address: 6100 Red Hook Duarte( B3 SI. Thomas USV1. 00802 Fax Email

130p
House OversightUnknown

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content The provided file contains only a title and no substantive text, offering no names, transactions, dates, or allegations to pursue. Consequently, it provides no investigative leads, controversy, novelty, or power linkages. Key insights: Document contains only a header and filename.; No mention of individuals, agencies, or actions.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bill Siegel email chain discussing 'The Control Factor' and anti‑Islamic conspiracy narrative

The passage is an internal email and interview transcript promoting a conspiratorial worldview about 'Islamic Enemy' and 'Civilization Jihad.' It mentions Jeffrey Epstein as a sender but provides no c Email originates from Jeffrey Epstein's address, but only contains a casual invitation and a link to Bill Siegel outlines a theory called the 'Control Factor' that frames Islam as a coordinated threa

20p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein Child Sex Trafficking Investigation – FBI Records, Deleted Pages, Non‑Prosecution Deal, High‑Profile Connections

The compiled documents reveal a dense web of FBI case files, internal forms, and communications that reference Jeffrey Epstein’s illegal sexual activities with minors, a secret non‑prosecution agreeme FBI case number 31E‑MM‑108062 repeatedly references ‘Child Locate’ entries and deleted pages (b6, b7 Multiple internal FD‑515 forms list Jeffrey Epstein as a subject (named explicitly on 09/30/2008 e

181p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.