Court argument on admissibility of police reports to show witness Maxwell's state of mind

Court argument on admissibility of police reports to show witness Maxwell's state of mind The passage provides a procedural argument about evidence admissibility, mentioning a witness (Ms. Maxwell) and a reference to United States v. Gotti and the FBI. It does not reveal new factual allegations, financial flows, or misconduct by high‑level officials, limiting its investigative value. Key insights: Counsel argues police reports and transcripts cannot be used to infer Maxwell's state of mind.; Cites United States v. Gotti as precedent for state‑of‑mind evidence.; Mentions FBI wiretaps in the Gotti case, but no new details are disclosed.