Legal brief cites Fifth Amendment case in context of Epstein‑related testimony

Legal brief cites Fifth Amendment case in context of Epstein‑related testimony The passage merely references precedent cases (FDIC v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., LiButti) to argue admissibility of Fifth Amendment statements in a civil case involving alleged conspirators like Ms. Giuffre. It provides no new factual leads, names of financial flows, or actionable details about powerful actors beyond already public Epstein‑related allegations. Key insights: Attorney argues that Fifth Amendment invocations can be used against alleged conspirators.; Cites 1995 Fifth Circuit case FDIC v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland.; References Second Circuit case LiButti as controlling precedent.