Skip to main content
Skip to content
Academic discussion of counterfactual models for assessing intelligent agentsAcademic passage on formal model of intelligent agents – no actionable leads
Case File
kaggle-ho-013057House Oversight

Technical AI Formalism on Pragmatic General Intelligence – No Evident Leads

Technical AI Formalism on Pragmatic General Intelligence – No Evident Leads The passage consists solely of abstract definitions and mathematical formalism about measuring AI intelligence and generality. It contains no references to individuals, institutions, financial transactions, or controversial actions, offering no investigative value. Key insights: Defines inference ability and pragmatic general intelligence mathematically.; Introduces fuzzy sets for agents and contexts.; Discusses quantifying generality versus narrow AI.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-013057
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Technical AI Formalism on Pragmatic General Intelligence – No Evident Leads The passage consists solely of abstract definitions and mathematical formalism about measuring AI intelligence and generality. It contains no references to individuals, institutions, financial transactions, or controversial actions, offering no investigative value. Key insights: Defines inference ability and pragmatic general intelligence mathematically.; Introduces fuzzy sets for agents and contexts.; Discusses quantifying generality versus narrow AI.

Persons Referenced (1)

Not specified

“sim( X,Y )p(d,Y) Dyes, sim(X, Y) where sim is a specified decreasing function of d(X,Y), such as sim(X,Y) =”

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightai-theoryintelligence-measurementtechnical-document
View on oversight.house.gov

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
7.4 Intellectual Breadth: Quantifying the Generality of an Agent’s Intelligence 141 e the prior probability 0(6) according to some assumed distribution 0 e the effectiveness p(d, X) of 6 at predicting the actions of an agent X € ¥, We may then define Definition 7 The inference ability of the agent 6, relative to and X, is Lyes, sim( X,Y )p(d,Y) Dyes, sim(X, Y) where sim is a specified decreasing function of d(X,Y), such as sim(X,Y) = qu,x (8) = 8(8) 1 I+d(X,Y)° To construct tx, we may then use the model of X created by the agent 6 € A with the highest inference ability relative to 4 and X (using some specified ordering, in case of a tie). Having constructed 7x, we can then say that Definition 8 The inferred pragmatic general intelligence (relative to v and y) of a naturalistic agent X defined relative to an environment ys, is defined as the pragmatic general intelligence of the model rx of X produced by the agent 6 € A with maximal inference ability relative to js (and in the case of a tte, the first of these in the ordering defined over A). The inferred efficient pragmatic general intelligence of X relative to ys is defined similarly. This provides a precise characterization of the pragmatic and efficient pragmatic intelligence of real-world systems, based on their observed behaviors. It’s a bit messy; but the real world tends to be like that. 7.4 Intellectual Breadth: Quantifying the Generality of an Agent’s Intelligence We turn now to a related question: How can one quantify the degree of generality that an intelligent agent possesses? Above we have discussed the qualitative distinction between AGI and “Narrow AI”, and intelligence as we have formalized it above is specifically intended as a measure of general intelligence. But quantifying intelligence is different than quantifying generality versus narrowness. To make the discussion simpler, we introduce the term “context” as a shorthand for “envi- ronment/interval triple (4,9,7).” Given a context (,9,7'), and a set »' of agents, one may construct a fuzzy set Agygr gathering those agents that are intelligent relative to the context; and given a set of contexts, one may also define a fuzzy set Con, gathering those contexts with respect to which a given agent 7 is intelligent. The relevant formulas are: l Nu,9g,T(Q)V io TP XAgu er (®) = XCong (9.7) = 7 Dd, = Q 139 Q where N = N(y,g,T) is a normalization factor defined appropriately, e.g. via N(y,9,T) = max Vi 9,7- One could make similar definitions leaving out the computational cost factor Q, but we suspect that incorporating Q is a more promising direction. We then propose

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01368715

(iii) No Violation or Conflict. Such execution, delivery and performance do not violate or conflict with any law applicable to it, any provision of its constitutional documents, any order or judgment of any court or other agency of government applicable to it or any of its assets or any contractual restriction binding on or affecting it or any of its assets; (iv) Consents. All governmental and other consents that are required to have been obtained by it with respect to this Agreement or a

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01449810

3 reinstated if at any time (including any time after its termination or expiration) any payment by the Obligor, in whole or in part, is rescinded or must otherwise be returned by the Bank upon the insolvency, bankruptcy or reorganization of the Obligor or otherwise, all as though that payment had not been made. (f) This is a continuing Guaranty and all obligations to which it applies or may apply under the terms hereof shall be conclusively presumed to have been created in reliance here

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01480194

. J.P. Morgan Entity Resolution Form J.P.Morgan D. Brokerage 3. RESOLVED, that those persons denoted above are authorized in the name and on behalf of the Entity to execute a brokerage egreement with I.P. Morgan Securities LLC and any successors or assigns, to purchase on margin or obtervise and borrow (en a secured or unsecured bass) from, sell (including short sales in a rhyme account), and lend (on a secured or unsecured basis) to, and to otherwise enter into transactors of any kind wi

1p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

FOR LICENSED INVESTIGATOR PURPOSES ONLY

15p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01279535

I WELLS FARGO CARD SERVICES PO BOX 77053 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55480-7753 YKG 95 Cheek here and see reverse for address comiDEN T I A n L i— SDNY_GM_00028498 EFTA_00113911 IS EFTA01279535 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR ACCOUNT Billing Anales Surnmary. II you bNºwyaur your is wrong ( 1 o 'I.a rf you need more informát,s abaca a tramite:ion on yace b il.wn:e:ou+on a separate sheet of pape. as :zonas postra* al: PD. Boa 522. Des Monea, IA 50305-0522.We must hear frOrnyOUISO lates tha

4p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01467642

Trade Type,Trade ID,DealGroupID,MTM,Ccy,Secondary MTM,Secondary CCY,Counterparty,Trade Date,Eff. Date,Settlement Date,Maturity Date,Delivery Date,Not.Amt 1,Not.Ccyl,Not.Amt 2,Not.Ccy2,Quantity,Ref. Entity,Long/ Short,Put/ Call,Strike Price,DBPays DBReceives,Next Reset,Spread At Maturity,Pmt Rate Ref.,Rate,Price Per Unit,BuySell,Pmt Ccy,Implied Volatility,Swapswire ID, Fair Price,Spot Price,Option Type,Option Style,Party,Delta,Product Type,Underlying Ticker,Unit,Vega,Gamma "FxEuroOpt","366

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.