Affidavit argues Edwards' actions were proper, denying abuse of process claims in Epstein case

Affidavit argues Edwards' actions were proper, denying abuse of process claims in Epstein case The passage merely restates legal arguments defending a party (Edwards) against abuse‑of‑process allegations. It provides no new factual leads, names of financial transactions, or evidence of misconduct involving high‑level officials. The content is routine litigation rhetoric, offering minimal investigative value. Key insights: Edwards claims his actions were within proper legal process.; Cites case law to refute abuse‑of‑process elements.; States Epstein did not question Edwards' motives during deposition.