Court denies amendment to add two additional Jane Does to civil rights action

Court denies amendment to add two additional Jane Does to civil rights action The passage only discusses procedural motions (Rule 21 and Rule 15) and a court's discretion to deny amendment. No high‑profile individuals, agencies, or substantive allegations of misconduct are mentioned, offering little investigative value beyond standard docket information. Key insights: Two additional unnamed victims (Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4) sought to join the case on Dec. 30, 2014.; The Government opposes joinder under Rule 21 and also opposes amendment under Rule 15, citing undue delay and prejudice.; The district court exercised discretion and denied the amendment.