Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-019299House Oversight

Lawyers seek unsealing of emails tied to alleged sexual misconduct claims involving presidential candidates, former president, and high‑profile entrepreneur

Lawyers seek unsealing of emails tied to alleged sexual misconduct claims involving presidential candidates, former president, and high‑profile entrepreneur The passage references alleged sexual misconduct by multiple presidential candidates, a former president, and a leading entrepreneur, linking them to a high‑profile legal dispute and potential court sanctions. While the claims are unverified and rely on disputed emails, the involvement of prominent figures (e.g., Alan Dershowitz) and the request for unsealing sealed documents provide a concrete investigative angle (court order, specific deadline, parties). This makes it a moderately strong lead, though the lack of concrete evidence lowers the score. Key insights: Allegations of sexual misconduct involve two presidential candidates, a former president, and a major entrepreneur.; Ms. EEE provided the allegations to a New York Post journalist, who declined to publish them.; Lawyers for the plaintiff have supplied documents to the Washington Post but withheld emails that could undermine the claims.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-019299
Pages
1
Persons
12
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Lawyers seek unsealing of emails tied to alleged sexual misconduct claims involving presidential candidates, former president, and high‑profile entrepreneur The passage references alleged sexual misconduct by multiple presidential candidates, a former president, and a leading entrepreneur, linking them to a high‑profile legal dispute and potential court sanctions. While the claims are unverified and rely on disputed emails, the involvement of prominent figures (e.g., Alan Dershowitz) and the request for unsealing sealed documents provide a concrete investigative angle (court order, specific deadline, parties). This makes it a moderately strong lead, though the lack of concrete evidence lowers the score. Key insights: Allegations of sexual misconduct involve two presidential candidates, a former president, and a major entrepreneur.; Ms. EEE provided the allegations to a New York Post journalist, who declined to publish them.; Lawyers for the plaintiff have supplied documents to the Washington Post but withheld emails that could undermine the claims.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversighthigh-importancesexual-misconductcourt-filingssealing-ordersmedia-disclosurepolitical-figures

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
EMERY CELLI BRINCKERHOFF & ABADY LLP Page 3 they were raw.” Notably, in these emails, Ms. [J mentions Professor Dershowitz, but she does not allege that she was trafficked to or had sex with him. As you know, Ms. EEE provided this information, on the record, to a New York Post journalist with the expressed hope that it would be published. Although these allegations, if credible, would have been the story of a lifetime — videos and eye witness accounts of sexual misconduct by two presidential candidates, a former president, and one of the world’s leading entrepreneurs— the New York Post declined to publish them, presumably, and not surprisingly, because it did not find Ms. MM credible. Nonetheless, thereafter, Ms. | represented by the same lawyers who represent the plaintiff in the above-captioned case, was permitted to testify that Professor Dershowitz had sex with her. These same lawyers have now provided documents to the Washington Post repeating the false charges, but have failed to provide the Post with the emails that fatally undermine them. These selective disclosures, and this use of the court’s protective and sealing orders “as a sword,” are manifestly improper. Professor Dershowitz intends to pursue all available remedies for violations of the district court’s orders, including sanctions. That said, to remedy the gross imbalance in available information created by counsel’s improper disclosures, we ask that the parties’ counsel immediately agree to a stipulation, to be so-ordered by Judge Sweet, unsealing and removing the confidentiality designations from Ms. HEEB emails. This will allow for full public disclosure of these matters—where their falsity, exposed to the “sunlight” of public review, will be manifest—and it will permit Professor Dershowitz to respond fully to the accusations plaintift’s counsel leaked to the Washington Post. Only with such full disclosure can the public decide who is telling the truth. Please let us know your response to this request by noon on February 9, 2018. Very truly yours, Andrew G. Celli, Jr.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Law firm correspondence reveals Alan Dershowitz intervenor in Giuffre v. Maxwell case and possible disciplinary filing shared with Washington Post

Law firm correspondence reveals Alan Dershowitz intervenor in Giuffre v. Maxwell case and possible disciplinary filing shared with Washington Post The document lists numerous attorneys and mentions that the firm representing Alan Dershowitz as intervenor in Giuffre v. Maxwell learned that plaintiff's counsel gave Washington Post reporters submissions from a pending disciplinary proceeding. This suggests a possible undisclosed disciplinary matter linked to the high‑profile Epstein‑Maxwell litigation, offering a concrete lead (names, case number, potential documents) for further investigation. However, the excerpt provides no specifics on the content of the filing, dates, or financial transactions, limiting its immediate impact. Key insights: Alan Dershowitz is listed as an intervenor in Giuffre v. Maxwell (No. 15‑Civ‑7433, S.D.N.Y.); Plaintiff's counsel allegedly provided Washington Post reporters with materials from a disciplinary proceeding; Multiple law firms and attorneys are named, indicating a broad legal team possibly involved in the case

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Letter alleges confidential deposition leaks in Giuffre v. Maxwell case, citing alleged emails about Russian hack, CIA involvement, and sexual misc...

The document provides a concrete allegation that plaintiff's counsel leaked sealed deposition material to the Washington Post, referencing alleged emails that claim Russian and CIA involvement and inc Plaintiff's counsel allegedly provided Washington Post with confidential deposition excerpts. Alleged emails claim Russian hackers, CIA, and Hillary Clinton’s “Special Agents Forces Men” were in Clai

3p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawyers seek unsealing of emails tied to alleged sexual misconduct claims involving presidential candidates, former president, and high‑profile ent...

The passage references alleged sexual misconduct by multiple presidential candidates, a former president, and a leading entrepreneur, linking them to a high‑profile legal dispute and potential court s Allegations of sexual misconduct involve two presidential candidates, a former president, and a majo Ms. EEE provided the allegations to a New York Post journalist, who declined to publish them. Lawy

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct

The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C

55p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.