Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Allegations of Suborned Perjury Involving Judge Paul Cassell, Bradley Edwards, and [REDACTED - Survivor]
Case File
kaggle-ho-022151House Oversight

Allegations of Suborned Perjury Involving Judge Paul Cassell, Bradley Edwards, and [REDACTED - Survivor]

Allegations of Suborned Perjury Involving Judge Paul Cassell, Bradley Edwards, and [REDACTED - Survivor] The passage hints at possible misconduct—suborning perjury—by a judge and a private investigator, with a third party ([REDACTED - Survivor]) allegedly pressured to make false statements. It provides some names and a timeline (10:18‑10:20 a.m.) but lacks concrete evidence, transaction details, or clear links to higher‑level officials. The lead is moderately useful for a deeper probe into court‑related perjury schemes, but its novelty is limited and the actors, while notable, are not top‑tier power figures. Key insights: Judge Paul Cassell and investigator Bradley Edwards are accused of encouraging false affidavits.; [REDACTED - Survivor] allegedly pressured to include false allegations against an unnamed individual.; Claims of perjury subordination are made during a recorded questioning at 10:18‑10:20 a.m.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-022151
Pages
1
Persons
6
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Allegations of Suborned Perjury Involving Judge Paul Cassell, Bradley Edwards, and [REDACTED - Survivor] The passage hints at possible misconduct—suborning perjury—by a judge and a private investigator, with a third party ([REDACTED - Survivor]) allegedly pressured to make false statements. It provides some names and a timeline (10:18‑10:20 a.m.) but lacks concrete evidence, transaction details, or clear links to higher‑level officials. The lead is moderately useful for a deeper probe into court‑related perjury schemes, but its novelty is limited and the actors, while notable, are not top‑tier power figures. Key insights: Judge Paul Cassell and investigator Bradley Edwards are accused of encouraging false affidavits.; [REDACTED - Survivor] allegedly pressured to include false allegations against an unnamed individual.; Claims of perjury subordination are made during a recorded questioning at 10:18‑10:20 a.m.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightmedium-importanceperjurycourt-misconductlegal-ethicsinvestigative-oversightaffidavit-fraud

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
JaMEs PATTERSON * * * 10:18 a.m. Q: Which of my clients are you swearing under oath encour- aged Virginia Roberts to include allegations of an encounter with you at the New Mexico ranch? : Both of them—both of your clients, both Judge Cassell and Mr. Edwards—were both involved in encouraging [their] client to file a perjurious affidavit that they knew or should have known was perjurious recently when they sought to file another defamatory allegation in the federal proceeding. : Was the arrangement such that what you are charging Brad- ley Edwards and Professor Paul Cassell with doing was sub- orning perjury? : Absolutely. If you ask me the question, I am directly charging Judge Cassell and Bradley Edwards with suborning perjury. | have been advised that Virginia Roberts did not want to mention me, told her friends that she did not want to men- tion me. And was, quote, pressured by her lawyers into including these totally false allegations against me. Yes, your clients are guilty of suborning perjury. : Who told you that Bradley Edwards pressured Virginia Rob- — : erts into falsely identifying you? A friend of Virginia Roberts who called me out of the blue ~ and told me that she was horrified by what was happening to 7 me and that she recently had meetings with Virginia Roberts © and Virginia Roberts had told her that she never mentioned § me previously. That the lawyers pressured her into mention 254 ing me. And mentioni me, yes. 10:20 a.m. Q: What was the name of A: Her name is—her first Q: ‘Yes. A: I don't know the last na Q: Did you attempt to find A: Ihave her last name wr Q: Where? A: It’s in my—in my notes Q: When did you write Ret A: When she—when she f since you've asked me tk At first her husband ; would not give me their n had a series of phone cc please, to tell me their na they told me the story in g her name. She asked me her identity without her E her. Called her as recently I want to recall—I dc I called her twice last ni reveal her complete name and I will be happy to giv: top of my head.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightApr 17, 2019

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specific actions (e.g., alleged drafting of the NPA, defamatory statements, settlement confidentiality) and dates that could be pursued for documentary evidence, witness interviews, and financial‑flow analysis. If substantiated, the lead would expose potential prosecutorial misconduct and high‑level collusion, generating major public outrage. Key insights: Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz.; Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded Epstein and co‑conspirators.; Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, approved the NPA; later became Trump’s Secretary of Labor.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein Child Sex Trafficking Investigation – FBI Records, Deleted Pages, Non‑Prosecution Deal, High‑Profile Connections

The compiled documents reveal a dense web of FBI case files, internal forms, and communications that reference Jeffrey Epstein’s illegal sexual activities with minors, a secret non‑prosecution agreeme FBI case number 31E‑MM‑108062 repeatedly references ‘Child Locate’ entries and deleted pages (b6, b7 Multiple internal FD‑515 forms list Jeffrey Epstein as a subject (named explicitly on 09/30/2008 e

181p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

88p
House OversightUnknown

Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court

Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court The filing reveals a procedural move by a high‑profile attorney to access testimony from [REDACTED - Survivor], a key witness in the Epstein‑related allegations. While it connects a well‑known lawyer to the case, it offers no new factual disclosures, financial flows, or direct involvement of senior officials. The lead is moderately useful for tracking litigation strategy but lacks novel or explosive content. Key insights: Dershowitz filed a motion to lift a confidentiality seal on a deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor].; The motion was filed on Feb 3 2016, referencing a Jan 12 2016 confidentiality order.; Dershowitz argues the need to share the testimony with expert witnesses and other parties for his defense.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] testimony and filings implicate Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in alleged sex‑trafficking ...

The document combines a sworn complaint, detailed deposition excerpts, and internal communications that directly name high‑profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, former U.S. President‑li Giuffre alleges Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz were among the men she was forced to service for E The complaint states Epstein’s 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) barred federal charges against

47p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.