Critique of NLRB Notice‑Posting Rulemaking Process

Critique of NLRB Notice‑Posting Rulemaking Process The passage merely debates the evidentiary basis for a Labor Board rule and references standard administrative authorities. It does not identify new financial flows, misconduct, or direct involvement of high‑ranking officials beyond generic references to the President and the Department of Labor, offering little actionable investigative lead. Key insights: The NLRB’s proposed mandatory notice‑posting rule is challenged as lacking substantial evidence.; Cited studies and anecdotes are deemed insufficient to prove employee ignorance of NLR​A rights.; The author argues the rule is arbitrary and capricious, suggesting a predisposition to issue it regardless of data.