1 duplicate copy in the archive
efta-efta01355627
EFTA Document EFTA01355627
C 0 00 Z Z -n Page 14 00 mm z z r > r- mo C A " 1 THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2010 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Doe II v. Epstein et al to PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe II CD DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey AMICUS: United States of America WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:09cv80469 FILING DATE: 3/24/2009 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra, K
Summary
C 0 00 Z Z -n Page 14 00 mm z z r > r- mo C A " 1 THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2010 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Doe II v. Epstein et al to PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe II CD DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey AMICUS: United States of America WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:09cv80469 FILING DATE: 3/24/2009 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra, K
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (5)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:09CV80469pathtojustice.comFax: 954-524-2822954-524-2820954-524-2822Related Documents (6)
[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation
[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specific actions (e.g., alleged drafting of the NPA, defamatory statements, settlement confidentiality) and dates that could be pursued for documentary evidence, witness interviews, and financial‑flow analysis. If substantiated, the lead would expose potential prosecutorial misconduct and high‑level collusion, generating major public outrage. Key insights: Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz.; Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded Epstein and co‑conspirators.; Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, approved the NPA; later became Trump’s Secretary of Labor.
Alan Dershowitz seeks court clarification to disclose sealed deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor] to prosecutors for perjury probe
Alan Dershowitz seeks court clarification to disclose sealed deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor] to prosecutors for perjury probe The filing reveals a potential legal strategy to involve state and federal prosecutors in investigating perjury by a key witness who claimed to have been on Jeffrey Epstein’s island with former President Clinton. It provides concrete follow‑up steps (disclosure to the State Attorney and U.S. Attorney), names specific actors (Dershowitz, Roberts, Clinton, Epstein), and suggests a possible criminal inquiry, making it a strong lead. However, the claim is already widely reported and the filing itself is a procedural motion, limiting its novelty and direct evidence of misconduct. Key insights: Dershowitz requests permission to share the sealed deposition with investigative authorities.; The deposition concerns [REDACTED - Survivor]’s affidavit alleging presence on Epstein’s island with former President Clinton.; The motion cites a Jan 12 2016 Confidentiality Order that currently blocks disclosure.
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) and to alleged obstruction of federal investigations, witness intimidation, and a non‑prosecution agreement. It also references concrete documents (exhibits, deposition excerpts, flight logs, FBI emails) that could be pursued for forensic analysis, discovery requests, or FOIA requests. The combination of high‑profile actors, alleged criminal conduct, and detailed procedural allegations makes this a strong investigative lead. Key insights: Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creating adverse inferences.; The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contacts (Trump, Clinton, etc.).; Claims that Epstein’s attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz) may have helped suppress victim testimony and influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
EFTA Document EFTA01355633
• C) O 0 Z Z Page 22 00 mm z z r• > r- -o C *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2012 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 'n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Doe V. Epstein to PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe CD DEFENDANT: Jeffrey Epstein Amicus: United States of America Material Witness: Jean Luc Bruhnel DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:08cv80893 FILING DATE: 8/13/2008 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Kenneth A. Marra REFERRE
[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation
The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded
EFTA Document EFTA01381999
C 0 00 Z 11 Page 22 00 mm z z r > r- mo C *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2012 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Doe V. Epstein rn PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe CD DEFENDANT: Jeffrey Epstein Amicus: United States of America Material Witness: Jean Luc Bruhnel DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:08cv80893 FILING DATE: 8/13/2008 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Kenneth A. Marra REFERRED
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.