Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Title Match
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01358968Dept. of Justice

EFTA Document EFTA01358968

Other

Page 39 874 F.3d 787, *; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20596, **; Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P83,176; 64 Bankr. Ct. Dec. 216 terms and exact terms are given greater weight than general language" (internal quotation marks omitted)). 3 Finally, the Senior-Lien Notes holders argue that the lower courts erred in disregarding their contractual right to rescind acceleration,,4 a right that if invoked would have reinstated the original maturity date and thereby kept the Optional Redemption Clauses (and there

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01358968
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.