Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Title Match
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01368196Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01368196

Page 23 of 32 Soon afterward. the lawyers suing the Justice Department interviewed Ms. and asked her if any of Mr. Epstein's friends might have information about his exploitation of girls. When they mentioned Mr. Dershowitz she replied, "Yes," according to a transcript of the 2011 call. But last December, Mr. Dershowitz was drawn into the Justice Department lawsuit in an entirely different way. In a motion filed that month, Ms claimed that she and Mr. Dershowitz had sex when the was a mino

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01368196
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Page 23 of 32 Soon afterward. the lawyers suing the Justice Department interviewed Ms. and asked her if any of Mr. Epstein's friends might have information about his exploitation of girls. When they mentioned Mr. Dershowitz she replied, "Yes," according to a transcript of the 2011 call. But last December, Mr. Dershowitz was drawn into the Justice Department lawsuit in an entirely different way. In a motion filed that month, Ms claimed that she and Mr. Dershowitz had sex when the was a mino

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 23 of 32 Soon afterward. the lawyers suing the Justice Department interviewed Ms. and asked her if any of Mr. Epstein's friends might have information about his exploitation of girls. When they mentioned Mr. Dershowitz she replied, "Yes," according to a transcript of the 2011 call. But last December, Mr. Dershowitz was drawn into the Justice Department lawsuit in an entirely different way. In a motion filed that month, Ms claimed that she and Mr. Dershowitz had sex when the was a minor aboard Mr. Epstein's plane and at the money managers homes in New York. New Mexico and the Virgin Islands. She also asserted that Mr. Epstein had "sexually trafficked" her to other powerful friends, including Prince Andrew, the Duke of York. Buckingham Palace rejected the claims against the prince. The judge later struck Ms. motion from the court filing, but by then. the accusations were being widely reported and broadcast. Mr. Dershowitz's phone was ringing with calls from reporters seeking comment. At every opportunity, he called Ms. claims "outrageous falsehoods" and called the lawyers who had made the filing. Mr. Edwards and Mr. Cassell. "villains" who helped fabricate the claims against him. Mr. Dershowitz said hold seek to have them disbarred, adding he had diary records and other information to show he was not at locations where Ms. claimed they had met "They're prepared to tie, cheat and steal." Mr. Dershowitz said in an interview on CNN in January. The two lawyers, who declined to be interviewed for this article, filed a defamation lawsuit against Mr. Dershownz, who responded with his own counterclaim. Mr. Boies's firm soon entered the fray. In late 2014, a lawyer at the firm, Boles, Schiller and Flexner, agreed to represent Ms. in legal matters not directly related to the Justice Department lawsuit When Mr. Dershowitz's name surfaced in that lawsuit, another lawyer at the firm agreed to represent him before realizing that Ms. was already a client After the lawyer withdrew, Mr. Dershowitz expressed anger, saying that he had already told the firm his legal strategy before he was made aware of the conflict. Mr. Boies called the claim frivolous. "This idea of going to the press and asserting there is a conflict when you are not willing to make that claim in court is irresponsible," said the lawyer, who is perhaps best known for representing the Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore against George W. Bush in his challenge to the 2000 election results. That incident. however, was only the start of an escalating battle in which each man has accused the other of twisting words and spewing falsehoods. In October, during a deposition in the defamation case against him, Mr. Dershowitz testified that he had received a confidential phone call from a female friend of Ms. . who provided him with troubling information. According to Mr. Dershowitz's testimony, the woman said that Ms had told her that the had la iressured to level sexual charges at Mr. Dershowitz. She also described a plan to accuse Mr. Wexner of having sex with Ms. when she was underage. "Virginia and her lawyers hoped to get Si billion, B-I-L-L-I-O-N, $1 billion or half of his net worth," Mr. Dershowitz testified he was told. calling the plan an "extortion" attempt A lawyer for Mr. VVexner, John W. Zeiger, did not respond to telephone calls. But a person briefed on the matter but who was not authorized to speak publicly about it said that Mr. Wexner had never met Ms and no extortion attempt was made. Mr. Dershowitz says he wants nothing more than for Ms. topublicly retract her claims He insists that Mr. Boies privately told him that he believed Mr. Dershowitz was innocent and that Ms. while believing the allegations, was mistaken or confused. Mr. Boies says Mr. Dershowitz's claims are ludicrous. "I never said to him that I concluded that my clients' assertions were incorrect." he said. "I didn't say that. I didn't say anything like that." On Friday, Mr. Dershowitz filed an affidavit in a Florida state court, containing notes of his conversations with Mr. Boies that he says support his account. In it, he described Mr. Boies as telling him that if hisclient refused to withdraw her claim, "he could not ethically continue to represent her." Hours later, Mr. 8oies's firm asked the Florida judge to seal Mr. Dershowitz's affidavit and in a related filing. Mr. Boies described some of Mr. Dershowitz's assertions as "misleading" or "flatly untrue' In this intensifying game of legal thicken, it is not clear who will flinch first. Ms. seems unwilling to yield and used a recent court filing to fire back at Mr. Dershowitz. "He is lying by denying that he had sex with me." said Ms. who declined to be interviewed for this article. Mr. Dershowitz says he is no longer friendly with Mr. Epstein. who lives once again in his lavish Upper East side mansion. Still. like it or not, the lawyer remains tethered to him. Having defended Mr. Epstein, he said that he could not express his feelings about him. Several well-known criminal defense lawyers said that personal attacks were an occupational hazard. 'Alan has never shied away from a fight in his life," said Abbe D. Lowell, a lawyer in Washington whose clients have included the lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who was convicted of corruption in 2006. "He has been that kind of lightning rod." https://www.lexisnexis.com/dd/delivery/PmtDoc.do?jobHandle=1825:640721064&dnldFil... 4/30/2018 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0059862 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY GM_00206046 EFTA01368196

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

URLhttps://www.lexisnexis.com/dd/delivery/PmtDoc.do?jobHandle=1825:640721064&dnldFil

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01412453

Page 1 of 32 Report Created: Monday, April 30, 2018 21:12:50 (GMT) by Nathan Head Research Information: This document contains investigations on: SOUTHERN TRUST CO; SOUTHERN FINANCIAL LLC; DARREN K INDYKE; RICHARD KAHN; JEFFREY E EPSTEIN; JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN https://www.lexisnexis.com/dd/delivery/PrntDoc.do?- jobHandle=1825:640721064&dnldFil... 4/30/2018 EFTA01412453 Page 2 of 32 SOUTHERN TRUST CO 1 Tennessee Court of Appeals Opinion: Alexis Breanna Gladden v. Cumberland Trust a

63p
House OversightApr 17, 2019

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specific actions (e.g., alleged drafting of the NPA, defamatory statements, settlement confidentiality) and dates that could be pursued for documentary evidence, witness interviews, and financial‑flow analysis. If substantiated, the lead would expose potential prosecutorial misconduct and high‑level collusion, generating major public outrage. Key insights: Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz.; Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded Epstein and co‑conspirators.; Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, approved the NPA; later became Trump’s Secretary of Labor.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
House OversightUnknown

[REDACTED - Survivor] testimony and filings implicate Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in alleged sex‑trafficking and possible NPA cover‑up

[REDACTED - Survivor] testimony and filings implicate Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in alleged sex‑trafficking and possible NPA cover‑up The document combines a sworn complaint, detailed deposition excerpts, and internal communications that directly name high‑profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, former U.S. President‑linked figures) and describe alleged illegal conduct, a non‑prosecution agreement, and possible FBI involvement. It provides specific dates, locations, and payment details that can be pursued for forensic financial tracing and further legal discovery, making it a strong, actionable lead with high public sensitivity. Key insights: Giuffre alleges Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz were among the men she was forced to service for Epstein.; The complaint states Epstein’s 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) barred federal charges against him and co‑conspirators, and granted immunity to Maxwell.; FBI agents located Giuffre in Australia in 2011 and de‑briefed her at the U.S. Consulate, indicating law‑enforcement awareness of the network.

1p
House OversightApr 9, 2019

Empty Exhibit Provides No Investigative Leads

Empty Exhibit Provides No Investigative Leads The document contains only a title and no substantive content, offering no names, dates, transactions, or allegations to pursue. It lacks any actionable information, controversy, novelty, or linkage to powerful actors. Key insights: Document consists solely of a header and exhibit label.; No factual statements, allegations, or references to individuals or entities are present.

1p
House OversightNov 23, 2015

Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case

Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case The passage reveals a motion to keep certain filings confidential that contain allegations of sexual abuse by a high‑profile attorney, Alan Dershowitz, on behalf of [REDACTED - Survivor]. While it identifies a potential lead—unsealing these records could provide evidence of misconduct—it lacks concrete details such as dates of alleged abuse, financial transactions, or direct links to powerful political figures. The controversy is moderate, and the novelty is limited given the public nature of the Dershowitz‑Giuffre allegations. Key insights: Defendants Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell filed a response to Dershowitz’s motion to keep records confidential.; The contested records are three filings that recount [REDACTED - Survivor]’s allegations of sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz.; Plaintiffs argue the filings are not confidential and should be part of the public record in the defamation case.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.