Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1001House OversightLegal Filing

The document is a reply memorandum in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss Counts Five a...

The document is a reply memorandum in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictment. It argues that the alleged misstatements are not perjurious as a matter of law due to the ambiguity and immateriality of the questions and answers in a previous deposition. The filing references various legal precedents and cases to support its arguments.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1001
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document is a reply memorandum in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictment. It argues that the alleged misstatements are not perjurious as a matter of law due to the ambiguity and immateriality of the questions and answers in a previous deposition. The filing references various legal precedents and cases to support its arguments.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Motion to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictmentAlleged misstatements and perjury charges against Ghislaine MaxwellAmbiguity and materiality of questions and answers in a previous deposition
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.